|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Mar 8, 2017 15:19:33 GMT
Civil War didn't spend anytime debating about anything. The main story of superhero registration was forgotten after the first 15 minutes. They spent enough time on the subject, it kept getting brought up throughout the story. Heck, they gave the issue more thought than the X-Movies did with their Registration Act. They made that very logical fear of Humanitys' into a totally 1-sided issue. At least in Civil War you left with the issue unresolved (deliberately) without either side being "right".
|
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Mar 8, 2017 15:26:34 GMT
Civil War didn't spend anytime debating about anything. The main story of superhero registration was forgotten after the first 15 minutes. They spent enough time on the subject, it kept getting brought up throughout the story. Heck, they gave the issue more thought than the X-Movies did with their Registration Act. They made that very logical fear of Humanitys' into a totally 1-sided issue. At least in Civil War you left with the issue unresolved (deliberately) without either side being "right". The only "debate" was at the meeting with General Ross. And the whole foundation of the idea for the Accords was ridiculous to begin with considering no one from the government realised how many people the Avengers did save. They were paraded as heros at the end of both Avengers films and guys like Stark and Cap idolised after their solo movie outings. That doesn't compare to the public in the X universe hating mutants.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Mar 8, 2017 15:36:47 GMT
They spent enough time on the subject, it kept getting brought up throughout the story. Heck, they gave the issue more thought than the X-Movies did with their Registration Act. They made that very logical fear of Humanitys' into a totally 1-sided issue. At least in Civil War you left with the issue unresolved (deliberately) without either side being "right". The only "debate" was at the meeting with General Ross. And the whole foundation of the idea for the Accords was ridiculous to begin with considering no one from the government realised how many people the Avengers did save. They were paraded as heros at the end of both Avengers films and guys like Stark and Cap idolised after their solo movie outings. That doesn't compare to the public in the X universe hating mutants. No, they talked about it before anything started happening. Then Steve and Tony talked about it more after Steve was arrested for saving Bucky from the German Cops, then Tony meets with the others after they were arrested for the Airport battle. It was left unresolved deliberately. The Accords make sense given how the Government has always been trying to find some other ways of maintaining power aside from the Avengers. Originally they had the Phase 2 weapons, but that failed when Thor took away the Tesseract. Then they tried the Helicarriers, and that failed due to HYDRA. After Ultron, they had the political capital to try and take control of the Avengers directly while before they didn't. The X-Verse on the other hand, have the Mutants partly be responsible for their own mess because they ARE hiding and they refuse to ever meet the Government partway on making things better for Mutants. That and the hatred of mutants in the X-Verse is too one-dimensional and over the top to take seriously after a while. Mainly because they refuse to see things from the Human side and portray they as anything more than antagonistic characters. But this has always been the problem with X-Men.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jerk on Mar 8, 2017 16:29:14 GMT
Lol, you clearly misconstrued what he meant by issue and now you wont admit it. There is nothing wrong with admitting you are mistaken. But I bet you never will. If his post wasn't that interesting you wouldn't have responded in the first place. What did I misconstrue? I think you have misconstrued my understanding of the conversation. Knew you wouldnt admit it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jerk on Mar 8, 2017 16:49:00 GMT
Lol, you clearly misconstrued what he meant by issue and now you wont admit it. There is nothing wrong with admitting you are mistaken. But I bet you never will. If his post wasn't that interesting you wouldn't have responded in the first place. I don't have any memorable previous (bad) interactions with ArArArchStanton, so I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt. I am going to assume that he still doesn't understand what I'm saying (and isn't all that bright), which is clearly better than being the stubborn a-hole. I wouldnt bother. I've seen him comment with insults towards other members just for having different opinions than him in regards to the MCU. He's not interested in discussing opposing opinions.
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 8, 2017 16:57:24 GMT
Lol, you clearly misconstrued what he meant by issue and now you wont admit it. There is nothing wrong with admitting you are mistaken. But I bet you never will. If his post wasn't that interesting you wouldn't have responded in the first place. What did I misconstrue? I think you have misconstrued my understanding of the conversation. You are either stupid or stubborn. Either way, it doesn't bode well for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 8, 2017 18:56:40 GMT
Civil War didn't spend anytime debating about anything. The main story of superhero registration was forgotten after the first 15 minutes. They spent enough time on the subject, it kept getting brought up throughout the story. Heck, they gave the issue more thought than the X-Movies did with their Registration Act. They made that very logical fear of Humanitys' into a totally 1-sided issue. At least in Civil War you left with the issue unresolved (deliberately) without either side being "right". While I agree that it never seems to come up in the X-Men movies, I can't really fault the movies since that's how the comics present as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Mar 8, 2017 19:59:08 GMT
They spent enough time on the subject, it kept getting brought up throughout the story. Heck, they gave the issue more thought than the X-Movies did with their Registration Act. They made that very logical fear of Humanitys' into a totally 1-sided issue. At least in Civil War you left with the issue unresolved (deliberately) without either side being "right". While I agree that it never seems to come up in the X-Men movies, I can't really fault the movies since that's how the comics present as well. Yeah, but the movies should take the opportunity to do stuff the comics never did do and actually advanced X-Men's premise. As it is, Xavier and co really come off as incompetents who don't do much to make the world better. They just sit back and merely react to everything the villains do.
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 8, 2017 20:24:09 GMT
While I agree that it never seems to come up in the X-Men movies, I can't really fault the movies since that's how the comics present as well. Yeah, but the movies should take the opportunity to do stuff the comics never did do and actually advanced X-Men's premise. As it is, Xavier and co really come off as incompetents who don't do much to make the world better. They just sit back and merely react to everything the villains do. To be completely honest, I don't think we lived in that kind of world back then. I don't think we were ready to have that kind of conversation about our movies, TV shows, etc. Everything was either good or bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 8, 2017 20:26:15 GMT
I am surprised that I don't have at least one person yelling at me for saying that while I was saddened, I wasn't totally against Professor Xavier's being put down. I remember back on IMDb I posted that the Registration Act and the Accords (on MCU movie boards) weren't completely without merit. I remember a lot of people objecting to the statements.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 20:34:54 GMT
They spent enough time on the subject, it kept getting brought up throughout the story. Heck, they gave the issue more thought than the X-Movies did with their Registration Act. They made that very logical fear of Humanitys' into a totally 1-sided issue. At least in Civil War you left with the issue unresolved (deliberately) without either side being "right". While I agree that it never seems to come up in the X-Men movies, I can't really fault the movies since that's how the comics present as well.
I disagree, the comics did talk about this as well. Especially with Magneto. He was put on trial for his crimes at one point. Although the X-Men did have a problem allowing regular human courts to deal with mutant criminals, it did happen.
It did sort of fade a little in the nineties, but before that, I'ld say that it wasn't always the case in the comics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 20:37:07 GMT
I am surprised that I don't have at least one person yelling at me for saying that while I was saddened, I wasn't totally against Professor Xavier's being put down. I remember back on IMDb I posted that the Registration Act and the Accords (on MCU movie boards) weren't completely without merit. I remember a lot of people objecting to the statements.
Well, the movie made it quite clear that Xavier was a massive threat to everyone around him. So there was definitely a need to do something. Killing him might have been a bit too much, but medical treatment (as Logan tried) was most definitely necessary.
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 9, 2017 15:35:14 GMT
While I agree that it never seems to come up in the X-Men movies, I can't really fault the movies since that's how the comics present as well.
I disagree, the comics did talk about this as well. Especially with Magneto. He was put on trial for his crimes at one point. Although the X-Men did have a problem allowing regular human courts to deal with mutant criminals, it did happen.
It did sort of fade a little in the nineties, but before that, I'ld say that it wasn't always the case in the comics.
I'm not sure it is really a great example. I don't remember reading that comic as a kid, so I had to go look up a summary of the plot. Charles defends magneto, and as you pointed out the X-Men do have a problem with him going before a human court, so it is still in humans versus humans in this case. Why is it too much? Because we like him? I think the movie said that he killed seven people and injured 600 more in the West Chester incident. At the casino he injures at least a few hundred more. There are people who spend the rest of their lives in prison for less than that.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Mar 9, 2017 16:47:03 GMT
I disagree, the comics did talk about this as well. Especially with Magneto. He was put on trial for his crimes at one point. Although the X-Men did have a problem allowing regular human courts to deal with mutant criminals, it did happen.
It did sort of fade a little in the nineties, but before that, I'ld say that it wasn't always the case in the comics.
I'm not sure it is really a great example. I don't remember reading that comic as a kid, so I had to go look up a summary of the plot. Charles defends magneto, and as you pointed out the X-Men do have a problem with him going before a human court, so it is still in humans versus humans in this case. Why is it too much? Because we like him? I think the movie said that he killed seven people and injured 600 more in the West Chester incident. At the casino he injures at least a few hundred more. There are people who spend the rest of their lives in prison for less than that. For all his talk about Mutants and Humans living in peace, Xavier is pretty hypocritical and seems to endorse segregation. I think it wasn't until after Onslaught in the 90s he finally owned up and turned himself over to the Government because he realized that he WAS dangerous and it was wrong to ignore peoples' fear of him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2017 18:38:06 GMT
I disagree, the comics did talk about this as well. Especially with Magneto. He was put on trial for his crimes at one point. Although the X-Men did have a problem allowing regular human courts to deal with mutant criminals, it did happen.
It did sort of fade a little in the nineties, but before that, I'ld say that it wasn't always the case in the comics.
I'm not sure it is really a great example. I don't remember reading that comic as a kid, so I had to go look up a summary of the plot. Charles defends magneto, and as you pointed out the X-Men do have a problem with him going before a human court, so it is still in humans versus humans in this case. Why is it too much? Because we like him? I think the movie said that he killed seven people and injured 600 more in the West Chester incident. At the casino he injures at least a few hundred more. There are people who spend the rest of their lives in prison for less than that.
Xavier was a lot more likeable in the movies than in the comics. formersamhmd says it too, Xavier always a bit of a hypocrite, especially in the comics.
He kept him being a mutant a secret for a very long time, only giving it up shortly after the first time the X-Men went to Genosha. The writers of the series have made him do pretty terrible things over the years in the comics, I don't know the exact body count of mutants whose deaths he is directly responsible for (or indirectly), but it's fairly high. He never does seem too upset about that.
Killing an old man for being ill is slightly overdoing it. He deserves better than that in the movies, I'ld say. Yes, he's an atom bomb waiting to explode, and has killed people (although for some reason there was little explanation about the whole incident, making it all a bit distant. Apparently even X-Men died during his fit, but again, who cares as it's only vaguely mentioned once. A flaw in this movie, that happens way too much), but never intending to do so. Say a pilot has a heart attack during a flight, crashing the plane, everyone dies, but he survives. Why would you put him in prison?
As for the Civil War aspect in X-Men comics, the Magneto trial wasn't the best of examples, but he did stand before a jury of sorts. And the X-Men let that happen. (even if at that time Magneto was 'good')
I'm trying to think of other instances of something similar happening. I know that when Rogue first joined the X-Men, there was quite a debate amongst them whether or not she should be allowed to join them, but can't remember if they ever talked about turning her in to the police. As they later protected Rogue when the government finally decided to take her down, I'm guessing it's most likely a no.
There was a scene at the end of the whole "Executioner's song" storyline, where Beast and Angel decide to rebuild a pub that was destroyed during an attack of Apocalypse's Riders on Scott Summers and Jean Grey. During that scene they were talking about a paper they once had to write about responsibility.
There were cases of the mutants part of the Brotherhood of Mutants being put in jail though, also other 'mutant terrorist' groups being turned over to the authorities. There wasn't really that much mention of it all, but it did happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 9, 2017 18:43:30 GMT
I'm not sure it is really a great example. I don't remember reading that comic as a kid, so I had to go look up a summary of the plot. Charles defends magneto, and as you pointed out the X-Men do have a problem with him going before a human court, so it is still in humans versus humans in this case. Why is it too much? Because we like him? I think the movie said that he killed seven people and injured 600 more in the West Chester incident. At the casino he injures at least a few hundred more. There are people who spend the rest of their lives in prison for less than that. For all his talk about Mutants and Humans living in peace, Xavier is pretty hypocritical and seems to endorse segregation. I think it wasn't until after Onslaught in the 90s he finally owned up and turned himself over to the Government because he realized that he WAS dangerous and it was wrong to ignore peoples' fear of him.
Yep, after Onslaught destroyed cities and made all the non-mutant heroes disappear. So, more proof that he is indeed a bit of a dick
The whole Onslaught affair caused his mutant powers to no longer function, so what exactly was the point of turning himself over then? And turning himself over to the government allowed the rise of another anti-mutant organisation to cause havoc.
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 9, 2017 19:30:07 GMT
I'm not sure it is really a great example. I don't remember reading that comic as a kid, so I had to go look up a summary of the plot. Charles defends magneto, and as you pointed out the X-Men do have a problem with him going before a human court, so it is still in humans versus humans in this case. Why is it too much? Because we like him? I think the movie said that he killed seven people and injured 600 more in the West Chester incident. At the casino he injures at least a few hundred more. There are people who spend the rest of their lives in prison for less than that. For all his talk about Mutants and Humans living in peace, Xavier is pretty hypocritical and seems to endorse segregation. I think it wasn't until after Onslaught in the 90s he finally owned up and turned himself over to the Government because he realized that he WAS dangerous and it was wrong to ignore peoples' fear of him. I was never the biggest X-Men reader growing up, but when the Ultimate Universe was new I got really into that and I remember being bothered by Xavier more than a few times. I never found the movie version of them to be like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Mar 9, 2017 19:45:56 GMT
For all his talk about Mutants and Humans living in peace, Xavier is pretty hypocritical and seems to endorse segregation. I think it wasn't until after Onslaught in the 90s he finally owned up and turned himself over to the Government because he realized that he WAS dangerous and it was wrong to ignore peoples' fear of him. I was never the biggest X-Men reader growing up, but when the Ultimate Universe was new I got really into that and I remember being bothered by Xavier more than a few times. I never found the movie version of them to be like that. Ultimate Xavier was pretty much just a Cult Leader. And an extremely dirty old man who kept going after women young enough to be his daughters.
|
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Mar 9, 2017 20:33:04 GMT
I was never the biggest X-Men reader growing up, but when the Ultimate Universe was new I got really into that and I remember being bothered by Xavier more than a few times. I never found the movie version of them to be like that. Ultimate Xavier was pretty much just a Cult Leader. And an extremely dirty old man who kept going after women young enough to be his daughters. Just a few posts up you said the original version of the character, at times, called for segregation. Wouldn't that make that version of the character a little bit of cult leader too?
|
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Mar 9, 2017 22:23:07 GMT
Ultimate Xavier was pretty much just a Cult Leader. And an extremely dirty old man who kept going after women young enough to be his daughters. Just a few posts up you said the original version of the character, at times, called for segregation. Wouldn't that make that version of the character a little bit of cult leader too? All versions of Xavier the cult mentality to some extent, Ultimate Xavier just took it a lot further than usual.
|
|