I get depressed .....

That can only imply that there was someone before sentient life existed to think 'well this is kind of boring...I want to go to Disneyland!'. Why did any of the non-existent concious beings at the origin of the universe need any chances? And why is the suffering of others a price worth paying for your pleasure? What makes you qualified to determine what's an acceptable degree of suffering for someone else to endure for your supposed benefit?

Thankfully there is no such equivalence nor equation of who, how and why some have pleasure and some have pain as most have an interesting mixture of both.  Who are you to say this is intrinsically bad?

By continuing the cycle of imposition, there is a guarantee that this unfairness will continue. I'm saying that it's bad because people don't have the choice to opt out of having their wellbeing gambled with in order to satisfy someone else's ends. Surely you would agree in more or less every other circumstance that one could think of that people shouldn't be free to gamble with the wellbeing of others without consent when it isn't necessary for the unconsenting party (as in trying to solve some kind of problem that already exists or will imminently exist for that party) that they do so.

Not only is it not required, it's not imposition, not harm, and not unconsenting.  There's no requirement that any have to suffer other than via tendentious definitions of "suffering" by the pathologically morbid that mislabel the normal thriving parts of life, and of course directly by way of mentally deranged psychopaths aspiring for leaders to commit mass murder and ramp the world in to leagues higher savagery and suffering.  Things not being missed by the nonexistent or the nuked is irrelevant; the option of experience and enjoyment is all.  

---

Neuroscience and Free Will Are Rethinking Their Divorce

Each person determines whether they are suffering, and they should have the right not to be burdened with problems as a means to someone else's end. They deserve the right not to be collateral damage. Someone's happiness at having life does not justify the cost that is imposed on someone else. Why should you get to determine how much of someone else's suffering is a price worth paying for your pleasure?

First, we were only talking about intelligence being involved in the theory of natural selection when that's clearly not what the theory says or suggests. Second, as for intelligent design in general, there are arguments for it but no real evidence. Certain arguments have been debunked, and that's really all that can be done when there's no scientific evidence for it to start with.

You can violate Occam's Razor and add an un-evidenced hypothesis to the theory if you want, but nothing in the theory itself requires this interpretation to work. It would be like saying electricity works via Maxwell's equations and Lorentz force, but also invisible interdimensional beings are moving electrons around; what have you accomplished by adding the latter since it has no more explanatory (ie, predictive) power than the original theory? It's deeply irrational and anti-science.

Mic, someone else's suffering has nothing directly to do with me. We all just get life. I have said several times that there is no equivalence and you just choose to ignore it. You just successfully destroyed your own argument by saying that 'each person determines whether they are suffering' because although we can help each other, it is no-one else's business, not even the parents. We all have the choice to make the best of the life we have, no matter how dire.  I love the term that Cupcakes gave you 'pathologically morbid'!  lol So apt.

There is no 'cycle of imposition'.  There is life.  There is no consent required.  There is life. No-one suffers at the expense of others. It is the lottery of life. Each new life is an independent event.  It is  a shame you spend yours wishing you had never been born, let alone prosthelytising total birth control and annihilation of all living things.  It is actually laughable when I think of it like that. Hitleresque, butt laughable.