|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 7, 2017 5:30:35 GMT
This is a list of new movies I've seen so far this year and my rating (from 1 to 10):
Patriots Day - 5 The Founder - 7 A United Kingdom - 7 Collide - 6 Lavender - 5
I'll be adding new movies to the list throughout the year after I watch the movies.
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Mar 7, 2017 14:08:28 GMT
I can already guess some more ratings you'll give for upcoming movies:
Wonder Woman: 10/10 Justice League: 10/10 Guardians of the Galaxy 2: 1/10 Spiderman Homecoming: 1/10 Thor 3: 1/10
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Mar 7, 2017 14:08:41 GMT
Those will be your ratings no matter the quality.
|
|
zoilus
Junior Member
@zoilus
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 1,683
|
Post by zoilus on Mar 7, 2017 17:33:53 GMT
This is a list of new movies I've seen so far this year and my rating (from 1 to 10):
Patriots Day - 6 The Founder - 7 A United Kingdom - 7 Collide - 6 Lavender - 5
I'll be adding new movies to the list throughout the year after I watch the movies. Remember when you said "Captain America: Civil War will not make $1billion dollars" "Batman v Superman will be the highest crossing comic book movie ever (until Justice League)" "Doctor Strange - a November movie about a character no one knows or cares about - will bomb" ?? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
|
|
|
Post by penguintomreloaded on Mar 8, 2017 2:20:20 GMT
So, it's Marvel he dislikes and DC he loves? Okay. Too bad I haven't watched a superhero movie since The Dark Knight Rises.
|
|
|
Post by hairybuttcheeks on Mar 8, 2017 2:24:29 GMT
any grown man that likes comics that much has issues. but he is a midget virgin ginger
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 18, 2017 9:02:49 GMT
Updated list (updates in red): Patriots Day - 5 The Founder - 7 A United Kingdom - 7 Collide - 6 Lavender - 5 The Space Between Us - 5 Logan - 5
|
|
|
Post by klawrencio79 on Mar 18, 2017 12:18:58 GMT
Saw Get Out the other night. 8/10
Of course Anne Hathaway Fan gives Logan a 2/10. Who saw that coming!?!?
|
|
|
Post by marsexplorer on Mar 18, 2017 12:20:01 GMT
I haven't seen Logan yet, but you are rating it low just because it's Marvel. Logan is a 8.6 on Imdb, 92% on Rotten Tomatoes, and 95% on Google.
Very pathetic trolling. Step up your game. Klaw is right, you have been in bad form lately.
|
|
|
Post by klawrencio79 on Mar 18, 2017 12:21:35 GMT
I haven't seen Logan yet, but you are rating it low just because it's Marvel. Logan is a 8.6 on Imdb, 92% on Rotten Tomatoes, and 95% on Google. Very pathetic trolling. Step up your game. Klaw is right, you have been in bad form lately. Pfft, didn't you know that Disney has the critics and reviewers all bought and paid for?
|
|
|
Post by marsexplorer on Mar 18, 2017 12:27:11 GMT
I haven't seen Logan yet, but you are rating it low just because it's Marvel. Logan is a 8.6 on Imdb, 92% on Rotten Tomatoes, and 95% on Google. Very pathetic trolling. Step up your game. Klaw is right, you have been in bad form lately. Pfft, didn't you know that Disney has the critics and reviewers all bought and paid for? Do you suppose that he actually has seen the movie? I challenge AH to post a spolier. The ending maybe?
|
|
|
Post by klawrencio79 on Mar 18, 2017 12:28:44 GMT
Pfft, didn't you know that Disney has the critics and reviewers all bought and paid for? Do you suppose that he actually has seen the movie? I challenge AH to post a spolier. The ending maybe? He didn't see it, and anything he would post can easily be found online.
|
|
|
Post by runie on Mar 18, 2017 15:34:27 GMT
I want to see A united Kingdom.
I see you have rated it well. Thats good.
Manchester by Sea has been the best film I have seen recently by quite a long way - a solid 7.5/10
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 18, 2017 19:18:57 GMT
you are rating it low just because it's Marvel No, I'm always objective and unbiased in my ratings. Just because it's Marvel has nothing to do with. I liked the first 2 X-Men movies and also X-Men: First Class and X-Men: Apocalypse. I also liked the first Fantastic Four movie (the 2005 movie starring Ioan Gruffudd and Jessica Alba, not the 2015 movie starring Miles Teller and Kate Mara, which was 1 of the worst CBMs ever). But I gave Logan a 2 because Wolverine jsut isn't an interesting character. Wolverine is probably Marvel comics 2nd most popular character (behind Spiderman), but I've never liked the Wolverine character. The next X-Men movie is supposed to be another attempt to adapt the "Dark Pheonix" story from the comics. They tried it in X-Men: The Last Stand but that was horrible because they killed off Cyclops (1 of the main characters of the "Dark Pheonix" story in the comics) in the first 5 minutes and made it all about Wolverine. Hopefully, the next X-Men movie will finally do the "Dark Pheonix" story from the comics justice and actually be about Jean Grey and Scott Summers and not about Wolverine. Logan is a 8.6 on Imdb, 92% on Rotten Tomatoes, and 95% on Google. I don't care about ratings from other sites. Most of those people give Logan a high rating only because many characters are throwing out "F-bombs", which you normally don't hear in most other CBMs. The more F-bombs, the higher the rating given. But F-bombs can't make up for a boring character and uninteresting movie. I'm not a troll and I've never trolled. Do you suppose that he actually has seen the movie? Yes, I have. I never rate a movie until after I've seen the movie. That's why I hadn't rated Logan yet until last night, when I finally saw it. I challenge AH to post a spolier. The ending maybe? My username is DC-Fan. And if you really want the ending spoiled, then I'll PM you a spoiler. But you asked for it so don't blame me for spoiling the movie for you.
|
|
|
Post by marsexplorer on Mar 18, 2017 20:50:05 GMT
You don't have to bother sending me anything, I don't plan on watching the movie so nothing will be a spoiler for me.
|
|
ctown28
Sophomore
@ctown28
Posts: 507
Likes: 391
|
Post by ctown28 on Mar 18, 2017 21:48:58 GMT
Pfft, didn't you know that Disney has the critics and reviewers all bought and paid for? Do you suppose that he actually has seen the movie? I challenge AH to post a spolier. The ending maybe?
For Marvel movies he watches them illegally online. Ironically he is always talking about cheaters and frauds when he is admittingly breaking the law by watching pirated materials, but that's a whole different discussion
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 19, 2017 0:01:54 GMT
Do you suppose that he actually has seen the movie? I challenge AH to post a spolier. The ending maybe?
For Marvel movies he watches them illegally online. Ironically he is always talking about cheaters and frauds when he is admittingly breaking the law by watching pirated materials, but that's a whole different discussion
As marsexplorer and I have already explained to you on the IMDb message boards, watching them online isn't illegal as long as I don't download them and create another illegal copy. It's similar to computer software. If I borrow my brother's copy of Microsoft Office and install it on my computer, then that's illegal because I've created an illegal copy of the software on my computer. But if I borrow my brother's computer and use the legal licensed copy of Microsoft Office on his computer, that's not illegal because I haven't created an illegal copy of the software.
Same with the movies. As long as I don't download them and create an illegal copy, then it isn't illegal. Just like filming from the coaches booth (like the Cowboys and most other teams did) isn't against the rules and isn't cheating, but filming from the sidelines (like the Patriots did) is against the rules and is cheating.
|
|
ctown28
Sophomore
@ctown28
Posts: 507
Likes: 391
|
Post by ctown28 on Mar 19, 2017 0:34:06 GMT
For Marvel movies he watches them illegally online. Ironically he is always talking about cheaters and frauds when he is admittingly breaking the law by watching pirated materials, but that's a whole different discussion
As marsexplorer and I have already explained to you on the IMDb message boards, watching them online isn't illegal as long as I don't download them and create another illegal copy. It's similar to computer software. If I borrow my brother's copy of Microsoft Office and install it on my computer, then that's illegal because I've created an illegal copy of the software on my computer. But if I borrow my brother's computer and use the legal licensed copy of Microsoft Office on his computer, that's not illegal because I haven't created an illegal copy of the software.
Same with the movies. As long as I don't download them and create an illegal copy, then it isn't illegal. Just like filming from the coaches booth (like the Cowboys and most other teams did) isn't against the rules and isn't cheating, but filming from the sidelines (like the Patriots did) is against the rules and is cheating.
Tell that to the filmmakers that you are stealing from by watching their movies online instead of paying to see them so they can get their cut. No matter how you want to rationalize it, it is stealing. It would be no different than if you went to the theater and instead of buying a movie ticket, you snuck inside.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 19, 2017 2:10:01 GMT
Tell that to the filmmakers that you are stealing from by watching their movies online instead of paying to see them so they can get their cut. No matter how you want to rationalize it, it is stealing. No, it isn't. My brother is 3 years older than me. When he was in high school, he had to read a lot of novels for English class. He bought the books at a bookstore and read them. Then when I was in high school, I had to read many of the same novels for English class. Instead of buying the books at a bookstore, I just borrowed my brother's copy of the books and read them. Then when my sister (who is 4 years younger than me) was in high school, she had to read many of the same novels for English class. Again, instead of buying the books at a bookstore, I gave her the copy of the books that I got from my brother. Are you claiming that I stole from the writer, the publisher, and the bookstore because I didn't pay to read those books so they didn't get their cut? You would be laughed out of court with that dumb argument. As long as I didn't make an extra, illegal copy of the books (which I didn't), then it doesn't matter that I didn't pay to read those books or that the writer, the publisher, and the bookstore didn't get their cut. It was perfectly legal. It would be no different than if you went to the theater and instead of buying a movie ticket, you snuck inside. No, your analogy is flawed because I didn't "sneak inside". A better analogy would be if I lived in a building across the street from Wrigley Field and whenever the Cubs played a home game, I went up to the roof of my building and sat there with binoculars and watched the game from my roof without paying for tickets so the team didn't get their cut. That would be perfectly legal because I haven't "snuck inside" the stadium to watch the game.
|
|
ctown28
Sophomore
@ctown28
Posts: 507
Likes: 391
|
Post by ctown28 on Mar 19, 2017 6:21:19 GMT
Tell that to the filmmakers that you are stealing from by watching their movies online instead of paying to see them so they can get their cut. No matter how you want to rationalize it, it is stealing. No, it isn't. My brother is 3 years older than me. When he was in high school, he had to read a lot of novels for English class. He bought the books at a bookstore and read them. Then when I was in high school, I had to read many of the same novels for English class. Instead of buying the books at a bookstore, I just borrowed my brother's copy of the books and read them. Then when my sister (who is 4 years younger than me) was in high school, she had to read many of the same novels for English class. Again, instead of buying the books at a bookstore, I gave her the copy of the books that I got from my brother. Are you claiming that I stole from the writer, the publisher, and the bookstore because I didn't pay to read those books so they didn't get their cut? You would be laughed out of court with that dumb argument. As long as I didn't make an extra, illegal copy of the books (which I didn't), then it doesn't matter that I didn't pay to read those books or that the writer, the publisher, and the bookstore didn't get their cut. It was perfectly legal. It would be no different than if you went to the theater and instead of buying a movie ticket, you snuck inside. No, your analogy is flawed because I didn't "sneak inside". A better analogy would be if I lived in a building across the street from Wrigley Field and whenever the Cubs played a home game, I went up to the roof of my building and sat there with binoculars and watched the game from my roof without paying for tickets so the team didn't get their cut. That would be perfectly legal because I haven't "snuck inside" the stadium to watch the game. You mean a book that has been released and sold for public purchase? These movies you are watching are not on DVD and you are not borrowing them. Someone obtained an illegal copy and uploaded it and you are benefiting from said illegal copy. If your brother stole the books and loaned them to you and you got caught with them, you would be on the hook for receiving stolen property. As far as your watching a Cubs game from the top of a building, it's not even close to the same. Are you watching this movie through binoculars from an outside location? Why do you thinknow drive ins (yes, they still exist but not many) went away with broadcasting the sound through the car radio? Because people would park outside the drive in and tune in. Now they went back to the old speakers so if someone parks on the side of the road, they get no sound
|
|