|
|
Post by msdemos on Dec 31, 2017 15:45:01 GMT
I've read a number of books on the JFK assassination, and am getting tired of (usually) having the book in question solely focusing on EITHER a conspiracy theory angle, OR an Oswald acting alone scenario.......rather than examining ALL the evidence and coming to a logical conclusion based on the facts alone. Anybody have any suggestions on the best Kennedy assassination books they've read that examines the subject as objectively as possible, without presenting only that evidence that best supports just one conclusion (Oswald acting alone, or conspiracy)?  SAVE FERRIS |
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Jan 2, 2018 7:16:37 GMT
I honestly feel the same been searching for awhile and can't find a decent possibility.
|
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on Jan 4, 2018 22:00:02 GMT
Some of you wanted to be famous writer, time to create what you can't find!
|
|
|
|
Post by koskiewicz on Feb 17, 2018 17:42:54 GMT
...try "Case Open" by Harold Weisberg.
This tome was published as a rebuttal to Gerald Posner's "Case Closed"...
In it, Weisberg identifies that Posner has done the following:
-distorted evidence
-suppressed evidence
-omitted evidence
-developed no new evidence
-omitted sources
-misappropriated the research of others
-mislead the reader into believing that he had sponsored new scientific computer enhancements
Mr Weisberg was a foremost researcher into the JFK assassination.
|
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on Feb 14, 2019 0:01:14 GMT
You may have read it but I'm about one third in Accessories after the Fact by Sylvia Meagher. archive.org/details/AccessoriesAfterTheFactShe compares the conclusion in the Warren Commission Report to what is found in the volumes of Hearings and Exhibits of the same Commission. She does make a case that Oswald might have walked, had he faced a fair trial. She mostly attacks the issues in the way the Commission operated or made its conclusions. It does go back a bit though, so some information might have been confirmed or proven untrue since but it's interesting. I'm wondering if anyone has read Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy by Vincent Bugliosi. I'm more curious about it than really consider it a neutral book. |
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Feb 15, 2019 3:09:21 GMT
You may have read it but I'm about one third in Accessories after the Fact by Sylvia Meagher. archive.org/details/AccessoriesAfterTheFactShe compares the conclusion in the Warren Commission Report to what is found in the volumes of Hearings and Exhibits of the same Commission. She does make a case that Oswald might have walked, had he faced a fair trial. She mostly attacks the issues in the way the Commission operated or made its conclusions. It does go back a bit though, so some information might have been confirmed or proven untrue since but it's interesting. I'm wondering if anyone has read Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy by Vincent Bugliosi. I'm more curious about it than really consider it a neutral book. ill give it a shot as well. |
|
|
|
Post by koskiewicz on Feb 15, 2019 23:26:32 GMT
In addition to "Case Open" By Harold Weisberg, there is another very compelling book entitled "ZR Rifle" by Claudia Furiati
One additional outstanding reference book is entitled "The Assassination of John F Kennedy" which includes dates, places and people. By James P Duffy and Vincent L Ricci.
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Mar 11, 2019 17:58:35 GMT
You may have read it but I'm about one third in Accessories after the Fact by Sylvia Meagher. archive.org/details/AccessoriesAfterTheFactShe compares the conclusion in the Warren Commission Report to what is found in the volumes of Hearings and Exhibits of the same Commission. She does make a case that Oswald might have walked, had he faced a fair trial. She mostly attacks the issues in the way the Commission operated or made its conclusions. It does go back a bit though, so some information might have been confirmed or proven untrue since but it's interesting. I'm wondering if anyone has read Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy by Vincent Bugliosi. I'm more curious about it than really consider it a neutral book. I started reading Reclaiming History; ultimately from what I've read so far, Bugliosi believed Oswald was the sole assassin, but he does explore many of the popular conspiracy theories and attempts to debunk them. It's a good book (maybe it should be classified as a "tome"), and while I still believe there was more than likely conspiracy, Bugliosi made a good case for the "lone nut".
|
|
