|
Post by thepeopleschamp24 on Mar 7, 2017 23:04:20 GMT
I will see it but it looks pretty stupid
|
|
|
Post by Jerk on Mar 7, 2017 23:05:52 GMT
I think it looks great. I don't look for quality drama in giant monster movies.
|
|
|
Post by bonerxmas on Mar 7, 2017 23:14:05 GMT
I think it looks great. I don't look for quality drama in giant monster movies. well he's not asking about "quality drama", he's asking for it not to be stupid
|
|
|
Post by darksidebeadle on Mar 7, 2017 23:19:13 GMT
I'll skip it
|
|
|
Post by aliciarose26 on Mar 8, 2017 0:54:38 GMT
No but I have never been a fan of the monkey/ape/primate movies.
|
|
|
Post by conspirologist on Mar 8, 2017 1:02:18 GMT
It looks like a good popcorn & beer movie.
Lots of guns and helicopters, also good CGI. Looks like a fun ride.
|
|
|
Post by LeWildPlatypus on Mar 8, 2017 1:29:12 GMT
For me there's only one King Kong movie and that's the 1933 original. But I do admit the new design is excellent, more reminiscent of the original. My concern is if there's not enough Kong, I'll probably wait for the Blu-ray release.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 1:49:10 GMT
Looks like another unnecessary-too-soon-remake from Hollywood to me.
|
|
|
Post by thepeopleschamp24 on Mar 8, 2017 1:49:49 GMT
It looks like a good popcorn & beer movie. Lots of guns and helicopters, also good CGI. Looks like a fun ride. Lol lots of bestiality between Kong and John Goodman
|
|
|
Post by thepeopleschamp24 on Mar 8, 2017 1:51:41 GMT
For me there's only one King Kong movie and that's the 1933 original. But I do admit the new design is excellent, more reminiscent of the original. My concern is if there's not enough Kong, I'll probably wait for the Blu-ray release. Exactly, that's why Godzilla sucked, no Godzilla.
|
|
|
Post by conspirologist on Mar 8, 2017 2:04:58 GMT
For me there's only one King Kong movie and that's the 1933 original. But I do admit the new design is excellent, more reminiscent of the original. My concern is if there's not enough Kong, I'll probably wait for the Blu-ray release. Exactly, that's why Godzilla sucked, no Godzilla. Godzilla sucked because the director sucks. Previous Godzilla (1998) was cool. I'll stick with it.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 8, 2017 2:11:38 GMT
I think it looks visually interesting, heavily stylized and inspired.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 3:17:41 GMT
My worry is that they may make Kong look 'ultra-realistic' and that sometimes leads to a modeling effect and the backgrounds don't blend that well.
Just as the Japanese don't design entirely human looking robots because they are not and tend to disturb your reality a little.
King Kong 2005 by Pete Jackson had the look right but not the casting, the fight scene between Kong and the T-Rex's is still outstanding.
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Mar 8, 2017 3:29:31 GMT
Im sure it will be watchable but I doubt it'll be gold. Not even the good Kong movies are gold, so why would I expect better?
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 8, 2017 12:47:33 GMT
Define good. It looks dumb but fun, which is the definition of a popcorn film.
|
|
|
Post by pimpinainteasy on Mar 8, 2017 14:46:56 GMT
it looks like fun based on the trailer. like a big budget version of SNAKES ON A PLANE. without the nude scenes i guess.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 8, 2017 16:14:07 GMT
It's gotten decent reviews and some are even praising it for being just a "dumb fun" b movie romp. I was seeing this opening weekend anyway but it's a plus.
|
|
|
Post by pimpinainteasy on Mar 10, 2017 10:16:49 GMT
|
|
fees
New Member
@fees
Posts: 43
Likes: 7
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by fees on Mar 10, 2017 10:24:15 GMT
It looks sht. It probably is sht. Such is life.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2017 12:00:07 GMT
I will see it but it looks pretty stupid It is strange to me how the 2005 Peter Jackson CGI Kong can look more realistic than the CGI 2017 Kong.
|
|