|
|
Post by marsexplorer on Jan 3, 2018 18:37:53 GMT
I have been holding my tongue about the Vikings due to my extreme superstition regarding them, but yes they are good. Take a look at this: 3rd in third down converstions 1st in catches that are contested 6th in first down conversions 1st in total defense (2nd against the pass. 2nd against the run) 2nd in 1st down defense 1st in 3rd down defense They are a complete team. Now I've done it. The jinx is on. GARY ANDERSON! BLAIR WALSH! KAI FORBATH! Wait...what in the hell am I doing?
|
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Jan 3, 2018 19:43:23 GMT
Foles has only played in one playoff game (which he lost to Brees) and the Eagles haven't won a home playoff game in how long? 11 years? Foles has been awful lately and if he starts off badly then the Philly crowd will turn on him quick. Then "home field advantage" won't mean shit. For some reason - I really don't think they will turn on him. It's not his fault Wentz went down. I think the city sees that and he's not even half the player Wentz is. I think a lot of people as you can see are expecting them to be one and done. They're not going to be calling for Nate Sudfeld after that game against the Cowboys. That was my fear - that Sudfeld lit it up and there would be people calling for him to play. It's Foles or nothing. The guy has played well during his career at times - and granted he's looked awful too. I'm solely chalking this up as 'anything can happen'. Wouldn't shock me if they lost. Wouldn't shock me if they won. It's nice to have a home playoff game here for the first time in awhile. Real future is Wentz. And? Foles played well in that playoff game. He drove them down the field for the lead the last time he touched the field. The combined road playoff record of Keenum, Newton, Brees, Goff, and Ryan is 1-9. Philly is at home. Why is this so hard for you to understand? Everyone is counting the Eagles out and it is hilarious.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2018 19:56:14 GMT
For some reason - I really don't think they will turn on him. It's not his fault Wentz went down. I think the city sees that and he's not even half the player Wentz is. I think a lot of people as you can see are expecting them to be one and done. They're not going to be calling for Nate Sudfeld after that game against the Cowboys. That was my fear - that Sudfeld lit it up and there would be people calling for him to play. It's Foles or nothing. The guy has played well during his career at times - and granted he's looked awful too. I'm solely chalking this up as 'anything can happen'. Wouldn't shock me if they lost. Wouldn't shock me if they won. It's nice to have a home playoff game here for the first time in awhile. Real future is Wentz. And? Foles played well in that playoff game. He drove them down the field for the lead the last time he touched the field. The combined road playoff record of Keenum, Newton, Brees, Goff, and Ryan is 1-9. Philly is at home. Why is this so hard for you to understand? Everyone is counting the Eagles out and it is hilarious. What did I not understand? Did you mean to respond to SDM? I'm all in. I think they'll win. Wouldn't shock me if they won or lost though - and that goes for pretty much everybody in the NFC.
|
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Jan 3, 2018 20:12:22 GMT
And? Foles played well in that playoff game. He drove them down the field for the lead the last time he touched the field. The combined road playoff record of Keenum, Newton, Brees, Goff, and Ryan is 1-9. Philly is at home. Why is this so hard for you to understand? Everyone is counting the Eagles out and it is hilarious. What did I not understand? Did you mean to respond to SDM? I'm all in. I think they'll win. Wouldn't shock me if they won or lost though - and that goes for pretty much everybody in the NFC. I meant to respond to sdm. Either way, everyone is counting out this team. I can understand why, but I still feel they have just as good a chance as any.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2018 20:17:49 GMT
What did I not understand? Did you mean to respond to SDM? I'm all in. I think they'll win. Wouldn't shock me if they won or lost though - and that goes for pretty much everybody in the NFC. I meant to respond to sdm. Either way, everyone is counting out this team. I can understand why, but I still feel they have just as good a chance as any. Agreed. It's a crapshoot. Have never seen anything like it. I can see the Falcons, Panthers and Saints rolling into a joint and knocking any of the Rams, Eagles, and Vikes off. Should be a blast. That being said - if the Eagles don't make it to the Bowl - I'd rather see either the Rams or Vikes in there opposed to the other 3 since we've been there and done that. Ryan Vs. Brady II is a bit intriguing though after what happened last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdm3 on Jan 3, 2018 22:45:04 GMT
For some reason - I really don't think they will turn on him. It's not his fault Wentz went down. I think the city sees that and he's not even half the player Wentz is. I think a lot of people as you can see are expecting them to be one and done. They're not going to be calling for Nate Sudfeld after that game against the Cowboys. That was my fear - that Sudfeld lit it up and there would be people calling for him to play. It's Foles or nothing. The guy has played well during his career at times - and granted he's looked awful too. I'm solely chalking this up as 'anything can happen'. Wouldn't shock me if they lost. Wouldn't shock me if they won. It's nice to have a home playoff game here for the first time in awhile. Real future is Wentz. And? Foles played well in that playoff game. He drove them down the field for the lead the last time he touched the field. The combined road playoff record of Keenum, Newton, Brees, Goff, and Ryan is 1-9. Philly is at home. Why is this so hard for you to understand? Everyone is counting the Eagles out and it is hilarious. Why is it "hilarious" to count out the Eagles, a team who can do nothing on offense, a team who hasn't had the entire team play well in a game in weeks? "At home"? Philly hasn't won a home playoff game in 11 years. You are such a homer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2018 22:56:14 GMT
And? Foles played well in that playoff game. He drove them down the field for the lead the last time he touched the field. The combined road playoff record of Keenum, Newton, Brees, Goff, and Ryan is 1-9. Philly is at home. Why is this so hard for you to understand? Everyone is counting the Eagles out and it is hilarious. Why is it "hilarious" to count out the Eagles, a team who can do nothing on offense, a team who hasn't had the entire team play well in a game in weeks? "At home"? Philly hasn't won a home playoff game in 11 years. You are such a homer. To call a spade a spade - the ol' argument 'A team hasn't done this or that in so many years.....' really doesn't apply. New players. New coaches. In some situations new management. 11 years ago is an eternity. I get what you're saying. I don't blame people for thinking they're going to be one and done. I actually love it. I really think if things break right for them - they concentrate on the run, Foles doesn't turn the ball over and dinks and dunks, special teams and the 'D' steps up - they'll be in any game. I just can't see them getting smoked and obliterated. Granted the defense was abysmal the last month of the season or so (disregarding that exhibition game against the Cowboys the last week of the year) - they were actually #1 (somebody correct me if I'm wrong) against the run going into the Cowboys game. I just don't see any particular aspect of any one teams game in the NFC that puts them above another. Sure the Vikes D is tremendous. We're also talking about QB who has never been there before. Rams - yeah - they've been putting up a ton of points on people. Goff has never been there before. It sounds like the Birds - being the top seed just might be the most least respected team in the NFC - and I love it  
|
|
|
|
Post by sdm3 on Jan 3, 2018 23:20:49 GMT
Why is it "hilarious" to count out the Eagles, a team who can do nothing on offense, a team who hasn't had the entire team play well in a game in weeks? "At home"? Philly hasn't won a home playoff game in 11 years. You are such a homer. To call a spade a spade - the ol' argument 'A team hasn't done this or that in so many years.....' really doesn't apply. New players. New coaches. In some situations new management. 11 years ago is an eternity. I get what you're saying. I don't blame people for thinking they're going to be one and done. I actually love it. I really think if things break right for them - they concentrate on the run, Foles doesn't turn the ball over and dinks and dunks, special teams and the 'D' steps up - they'll be in any game. I just can't see them getting smoked and obliterated. Granted the defense was abysmal the last month of the season or so (disregarding that exhibition game against the Cowboys the last week of the year) - they were actually #1 (somebody correct me if I'm wrong) against the run going into the Cowboys game. I just don't see any particular aspect of any one teams game in the NFC that puts them above another. Sure the Vikes D is tremendous. We're also talking about QB who has never been there before. Rams - yeah - they've been putting up a ton of points on people. Goff has never been there before. It sounds like the Birds - being the top seed just might be the most least respected team in the NFC - and I love it  I'm just having fun with you guys, truthfully I wouldn't be all that surprised if the Eagles' defense carries them to a hard-fought win.  I would however be surprised if Foles' offense suddenly goes on a tear in a playoff game against a tough opponent.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2018 23:26:06 GMT
To call a spade a spade - the ol' argument 'A team hasn't done this or that in so many years.....' really doesn't apply. New players. New coaches. In some situations new management. 11 years ago is an eternity. I get what you're saying. I don't blame people for thinking they're going to be one and done. I actually love it. I really think if things break right for them - they concentrate on the run, Foles doesn't turn the ball over and dinks and dunks, special teams and the 'D' steps up - they'll be in any game. I just can't see them getting smoked and obliterated. Granted the defense was abysmal the last month of the season or so (disregarding that exhibition game against the Cowboys the last week of the year) - they were actually #1 (somebody correct me if I'm wrong) against the run going into the Cowboys game. I just don't see any particular aspect of any one teams game in the NFC that puts them above another. Sure the Vikes D is tremendous. We're also talking about QB who has never been there before. Rams - yeah - they've been putting up a ton of points on people. Goff has never been there before. It sounds like the Birds - being the top seed just might be the most least respected team in the NFC - and I love it  I'm just having fun with you guys, truthfully I wouldn't be all that surprised if the Eagles' defense carries them to a hard-fought win.  I would however be surprised if Foles' offense suddenly goes on a tear in a playoff game against a tough opponent. I don't know - he seems bipolar as a player as the Redskins are as a team. He can look tremendous - i.e. that 27 touchdown and 2 interception season where he was voted to the Pro Bowl. He played well getting thrown into the fire against the Rams. Lit the Giants up (yes - I know it's the giants) Then looked like a 3rd stringer against the Raiders and his limited playing time against the Cowboys - and yes - I know he was abysmal with the Rams - but that was with Jeff Fisher. You just don't know what to expect from him - my only hope is he doesn't try to do too much - i.e. forcing the ball, turning the ball over, etc. Concentrate on the run. I actually think they'll be fine. Joke may be on me. Who knows. Maybe I'm wearing homer blinders. I'm excited though and that's all that counts 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2018 23:49:11 GMT
Why is it "hilarious" to count out the Eagles, a team who can do nothing on offense, a team who hasn't had the entire team play well in a game in weeks? "At home"? Philly hasn't won a home playoff game in 11 years. You are such a homer. To call a spade a spade - the ol' argument 'A team hasn't done this or that in so many years.....' really doesn't apply. New players. New coaches. In some situations new management. 11 years ago is an eternity. I get what you're saying. I don't blame people for thinking they're going to be one and done. I actually love it. I really think if things break right for them - they concentrate on the run, Foles doesn't turn the ball over and dinks and dunks, special teams and the 'D' steps up - they'll be in any game. I just can't see them getting smoked and obliterated. Granted the defense was abysmal the last month of the season or so (disregarding that exhibition game against the Cowboys the last week of the year) - they were actually #1 (somebody correct me if I'm wrong) against the run going into the Cowboys game. I just don't see any particular aspect of any one teams game in the NFC that puts them above another. Sure the Vikes D is tremendous. We're also talking about QB who has never been there before. Rams - yeah - they've been putting up a ton of points on people. Goff has never been there before. It sounds like the Birds - being the top seed just might be the most least respected team in the NFC - and I love it   Let me try to understand this, and I swear, I have no intention of being provocative or disrespecting you. Much the opposite, I commend you for supporting your team in good and bad times. But let's think about this for a minute. I can understand when people "love it" if others underestimate their *good* teams and predict them as underdogs so that those *good* teams (or a good boxer like the fictional one you depicted) insidiously go, like sleepers, and surprise those who discounted them and therefore failed to adequately prepare for them. Yes, that's great. Or else, when others hate a team and engage in wishful thinking, failing to acknowledge how *good* they are, and arrogantly dismiss them, just to end up with egg on their faces. Yes, that's great. You are "loving it" that we've been suspecting that the Eagles will be one-and-done, but see, the problem is, we are not saying so for any of the above reasons. At least me, I am not. I don't hate the Eagles. I don't need to engage in wishful thinking against them. It's not that I'm failing to see how good they are, so that like sleepers they might surprise my team. It's actually because we see that they are *pretty bad right now.* They lost their excellent quarterback and went from clear contenders and actually favorites, to a dismal situation of getting a back-up, beating the awful Giants (who doesn't?) and then completely crumbling and falling apart (remember what happened to the Raiders when Carr got injured?). So, you "love" the fact that people have *real reasons, logical reasons* to suspect your team of being *pretty bad* and most likely *accurately so*? What exactly is there to "love" about it? We are not failing to see how *good* the Eagles are. We are actually rather seeing how *bad* the Eagles are. Do you think we are all misguided about how poorly the Eagles have been playing under Foles? Well, the thing is, chances are that we aren't misguided. We are just being accurate. So, is it because you believe that this will bring extra motivation for the Eagles players to try and get highly motivated for the playoff game? Sorry to break the news to you, but independently of *any* of the above, *all* players from *all* teams are *highly* motivated to win a playoff game. That's what they strive all year for. That's what they are paid to do. That's what they aim for as the coronation of their careers. There *isn't* such a thing as a player who *isn't* motivated to do well in the playoffs so I hardly see what kind of advantage the Eagles would be getting from people *noticing* (again, likely, accurately) how bad they are right now. So, if logic and cold analysis prevails and the Eagles indeed find themselves one-and-done, will you "love it"? Because, I wouldn't. If *my* team were in the Eagles' situation, I wouldn't be "loving it." I'd be concerned and worried. I wouldn't stop supporting my team in bad times, of course, but I really fail to understand what exactly is "lovable" about one's team thoroughly falling apart once their leader and star player gets injured. Sorry, but your *I love it* does sound to me like denial and wishful thinking. Again, I commend you for sticking with this fantasy, but I'm sorry to have to call it a fantasy. Maybe the Eagles will prove us wrong and will give you a lot of satisfaction by winning one or more playoff games. If that happens, I'll be man enough to come back here and say "wow, I tip my hat to you; you were right and I was wrong; sorry if I gave you a hard time on the occasion of your accurate optimism." But frankly, I think that the odds are that it is not going to happen. And I say so without holding any grudge whatsoever against the Eagles, a team I was greatly enjoying watching, while Wentz was still healthy. This is demonstrable. You can browse back to my posting history at the time of my "winners and losers" threads and see my comments about the Eagles, saying how much pleasure, as a football lover, they were giving me by simply watching Wentz' outstanding plays. So, I was favorably predisposed to the Eagles when they were good. Currently I regret to think of them as a very bad, very lost, non-competitive team that is highly likely to be one-and-done in the playoffs, and if by some miracle they pull it off and win the first game (any given Sunday...), I find that it will be very unlikely for them to repeat the same lucky performance in their second play-off game. In my prediction the odds that the Eagles will go to the Superbowl are comparable to those for the Titans and the Bills. That is, very, very small. Sorry, but it's what I sincerely think.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2018 23:52:22 GMT
To call a spade a spade - the ol' argument 'A team hasn't done this or that in so many years.....' really doesn't apply. New players. New coaches. In some situations new management. 11 years ago is an eternity. I get what you're saying. I don't blame people for thinking they're going to be one and done. I actually love it. I really think if things break right for them - they concentrate on the run, Foles doesn't turn the ball over and dinks and dunks, special teams and the 'D' steps up - they'll be in any game. I just can't see them getting smoked and obliterated. Granted the defense was abysmal the last month of the season or so (disregarding that exhibition game against the Cowboys the last week of the year) - they were actually #1 (somebody correct me if I'm wrong) against the run going into the Cowboys game. I just don't see any particular aspect of any one teams game in the NFC that puts them above another. Sure the Vikes D is tremendous. We're also talking about QB who has never been there before. Rams - yeah - they've been putting up a ton of points on people. Goff has never been there before. It sounds like the Birds - being the top seed just might be the most least respected team in the NFC - and I love it   Let me try to understand this, and I swear, I have no intention of being provocative or disrespecting you. Much the opposite, I commend you for supporting your team in good and bad times. But let's think about this for a minute. I can understand when people "love it" if others underestimate their *good* teams and predict them as underdogs so that those *good* teams (or a good boxer like the fictional one you depicted) insidiously go, like sleepers, and surprise those who discounted them and therefore failed to adequately prepare for them. Yes, that's great. Or else, when others hate a team and engage in wishful thinking, failing to acknowledge how *good* they are, and arrogantly dismiss them, just to end up with egg on their faces. Yes, that's great. You are "loving it" that we've been suspecting that the Eagles will be one-and-done, but see, the problem is, we are not saying so for any of the above reasons. At least me, I am not. I don't hate the Eagles. I don't need to engage in wishful thinking against them. It's not that I'm failing to see how good they are, so that like sleepers they might surprise my team. It's actually because we see that they are *pretty bad right now.* They lost their excellent quarterback and went from clear pretenders and actually favorites, to a dismal situation of getting a back-up, beating the awful Giants (who doesn't?) and then completely crumbling and falling apart (remember what happened to the Raiders when Carr got injured?). So, you "love" the fact that people have *real reasons, logical reasons* to suspect your team of being *pretty bad* and most likely *accurately so*? What exactly is there to "love" about it? We are not failing to see how *good* the Eagles are. We are actually rather seeing how *bad* the Eagles are. Do you think we are all misguided about how poorly the Eagles have been playing under Foles? Well, the thing is, chances are that we aren't misguided. We are just being accurate. So, is it because you believe that this will bring extra motivation for the Eagles players to try and get highly motivated for the playoff game? Sorry to break the news to you, but independently of *any* of the above, *all* players from *all* teams are *highly* motivated to win a playoff game. That's what they strive all year for. That's what they are paid to do. That's what they aim for as the coronation of their careers. There *isn't* such a thing as a player who *isn't* motivated to do well in the playoffs so I hardly see what kind of advantage the Eagles would be getting from people *noticing* (again, likely, accurately) how bad they are right now. So, if logic and cold analysis prevails and the Eagles indeed find themselves one-and-done, will you "love it"? Because, I wouldn't. If *my* team were in the Eagles' situation, I wouldn't be "loving it." I'd be concerned and worried. I wouldn't stop supporting my team in bad times, of course, but I really fail to understand what exactly is "lovable" about one's team thoroughly falling apart once their leader and star player gets injured. Sorry, but your *I love it* does sound to me like denial and wishful thinking. Again, I commend you for sticking with this fantasy, but I'm sorry to have to call it a fantasy. Maybe the Eagles will prove us wrong and will give you a lot of satisfaction by winning one or more playoff games. If that happens, I'll be man enough to come back here and say "wow, I tip my hat to you; you were right and I was wrong; sorry if I gave you a hard time on the occasion of your accurate optimism." But frankly, I think that the odds are that it is not going to happen. And I say so without holding any grudge whatsoever against the Eagles, a team I was greatly enjoying watching, while Wentz was still healthy. This is demonstrable. You can browse back to my posting history at the time of my "winners and losers" threads and see my comments about the Eagles, saying how much pleasure, as a football lover, they were giving me by simply watching Wentz' outstanding plays. So, I was favorably predisposed to the Eagles when they were good. Currently I regret to think of them as a very bad, very lost, non-competitive team that is highly likely to be one-and-done in the playoffs, and if by some miracle they pull it off and win the first game (any given Sunday...), I find that it will be very unlikely for them to repeat the same lucky performance in their second play-off game. In my prediction the odds that the Eagles will go to the Superbowl are comparable to those for the Titans and the Bills. That is, very, very small. Sorry, but it's what I sincerely think. I got about a 1/4 of the way down - and lost interest. But yes - it's the motivation factor 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2018 0:03:57 GMT
Let me try to understand this, and I swear, I have no intention of being provocative or disrespecting you. Much the opposite, I commend you for supporting your team in good and bad times. But let's think about this for a minute. I can understand when people "love it" if others underestimate their *good* teams and predict them as underdogs so that those *good* teams (or a good boxer like the fictional one you depicted) insidiously go, like sleepers, and surprise those who discounted them and therefore failed to adequately prepare for them. Yes, that's great. Or else, when others hate a team and engage in wishful thinking, failing to acknowledge how *good* they are, and arrogantly dismiss them, just to end up with egg on their faces. Yes, that's great. You are "loving it" that we've been suspecting that the Eagles will be one-and-done, but see, the problem is, we are not saying so for any of the above reasons. At least me, I am not. I don't hate the Eagles. I don't need to engage in wishful thinking against them. It's not that I'm failing to see how good they are, so that like sleepers they might surprise my team. It's actually because we see that they are *pretty bad right now.* They lost their excellent quarterback and went from clear pretenders and actually favorites, to a dismal situation of getting a back-up, beating the awful Giants (who doesn't?) and then completely crumbling and falling apart (remember what happened to the Raiders when Carr got injured?). So, you "love" the fact that people have *real reasons, logical reasons* to suspect your team of being *pretty bad* and most likely *accurately so*? What exactly is there to "love" about it? We are not failing to see how *good* the Eagles are. We are actually rather seeing how *bad* the Eagles are. Do you think we are all misguided about how poorly the Eagles have been playing under Foles? Well, the thing is, chances are that we aren't misguided. We are just being accurate. So, is it because you believe that this will bring extra motivation for the Eagles players to try and get highly motivated for the playoff game? Sorry to break the news to you, but independently of *any* of the above, *all* players from *all* teams are *highly* motivated to win a playoff game. That's what they strive all year for. That's what they are paid to do. That's what they aim for as the coronation of their careers. There *isn't* such a thing as a player who *isn't* motivated to do well in the playoffs so I hardly see what kind of advantage the Eagles would be getting from people *noticing* (again, likely, accurately) how bad they are right now. So, if logic and cold analysis prevails and the Eagles indeed find themselves one-and-done, will you "love it"? Because, I wouldn't. If *my* team were in the Eagles' situation, I wouldn't be "loving it." I'd be concerned and worried. I wouldn't stop supporting my team in bad times, of course, but I really fail to understand what exactly is "lovable" about one's team thoroughly falling apart once their leader and star player gets injured. Sorry, but your *I love it* does sound to me like denial and wishful thinking. Again, I commend you for sticking with this fantasy, but I'm sorry to have to call it a fantasy. Maybe the Eagles will prove us wrong and will give you a lot of satisfaction by winning one or more playoff games. If that happens, I'll be man enough to come back here and say "wow, I tip my hat to you; you were right and I was wrong; sorry if I gave you a hard time on the occasion of your accurate optimism." But frankly, I think that the odds are that it is not going to happen. And I say so without holding any grudge whatsoever against the Eagles, a team I was greatly enjoying watching, while Wentz was still healthy. This is demonstrable. You can browse back to my posting history at the time of my "winners and losers" threads and see my comments about the Eagles, saying how much pleasure, as a football lover, they were giving me by simply watching Wentz' outstanding plays. So, I was favorably predisposed to the Eagles when they were good. Currently I regret to think of them as a very bad, very lost, non-competitive team that is highly likely to be one-and-done in the playoffs, and if by some miracle they pull it off and win the first game (any given Sunday...), I find that it will be very unlikely for them to repeat the same lucky performance in their second play-off game. In my prediction the odds that the Eagles will go to the Superbowl are comparable to those for the Titans and the Bills. That is, very, very small. Sorry, but it's what I sincerely think. I got about a 1/4 of the way down - and lost interest. But yes - it's the motivation factor  You really need to work on the attention span problem, LOL. Yes, I'm verbose; yes, it was a long post, but not THAT long. It was made of a bunch of short paragraphs. The motivation factor, if you didn't get to that part, ALL teams and ALL players are motivated, when it's the playoffs, so, no, that doesn't confer an advantage to the Eagles. I mean, *my* team is not in this dismal situation (Matt Ryan says he's feeling pretty good, thank you) and *I* am worried that we'll be one-and-done against the Rams. I don't understand why *you* "love" your team's situation. Again, sorry to break the news to you, but it isn't a good situation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2018 0:07:11 GMT
I got about a 1/4 of the way down - and lost interest. But yes - it's the motivation factor  You really need to work on the attention span problem, LOL. Yes, I'm verbose; yes, it was a long post, but not THAT long. It was made of a bunch of short paragraphs. The motivation factor, if you didn't get to that part, ALL teams and ALL players are motivated, when it's the playoffs, so, no, that doesn't confer an advantage to the Eagles. I mean, *my* team is not in this dismal situation (Matt Ryan says he's feeling pretty good, thank you) and *I* am worried that we'll be one-and-done against the Rams. I don't understand why *you* "love" your team's situation. Again, sorry to break the news to you, but it isn't a good situation. I disagree. There's nothing like being completely disrespected in life where nobody gives you a chance. That is the Eagles situation right now. They are the #1 seed and nobody gives them a chance. Everybody is pretty much laughing at them. That in my eyes is motivation beyond belief. That's not the Bills, ain't the Rams, ain't the Vikings - it's a #1 seed getting laughed at and disrespected by the masses - and everyone expects them to lose. Talk about disrespect. And I love it 
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2018 0:19:50 GMT
You really need to work on the attention span problem, LOL. Yes, I'm verbose; yes, it was a long post, but not THAT long. It was made of a bunch of short paragraphs. The motivation factor, if you didn't get to that part, ALL teams and ALL players are motivated, when it's the playoffs, so, no, that doesn't confer an advantage to the Eagles. I mean, *my* team is not in this dismal situation (Matt Ryan says he's feeling pretty good, thank you) and *I* am worried that we'll be one-and-done against the Rams. I don't understand why *you* "love" your team's situation. Again, sorry to break the news to you, but it isn't a good situation. I disagree. There's nothing like being completely disrespected in life where nobody gives you a chance. That is the Eagles situation right now. They are the #1 seed and nobody gives them a chance. Everybody is pretty much laughing at them. That in my eyes is motivation beyond belief. That's not the Bills, ain't the Rams, ain't the Vikings - it's a #1 seed getting laughed at and disrespected by the masses - and everyone expects them to lose. Talk about disrespect. And I love it  I'm not laughing at them. I feel sorry for them. Like I said, I was enjoying their games, before. When they lost a game and people piled up on them, I said, "come on, everybody can have a bad day including Wentz". Then later Wentz got injured, and I was upset, and said so here. I said "I should feel reassured because my team is in the NFC and the Eagles falling from grace enhances our chances, but no, I actually feel sorry for them." And again, it's not disrespect. It's just being accurate. They *are* playing terribly right now. Will they recover? I doubt. They played terribly against very bad teams. When they face playoff-caliber teams, I'm afraid they will just crumble. So, a team opens up by scoring two TDs on them. Do you really think Foles will stage a comeback? Again, your optimism on behalf of your team is commendable. I just feel that unfortunately it is also very misguided. But hey, if you are right, more power to you, and I'll tip my hat to you. And I like your attitude much more than Christian-Flickinger's who calls others "dense" and say that it is "hilarious" to predict that the Eagles might be one-and-done. No, people are not being dense; they are being accurate; and no, it is not hilarious; it's called reality.
|
|
|
|
Post by marsexplorer on Jan 4, 2018 0:25:11 GMT
treefrogs
If the think any of the players and coaches are overlooking or disrespecting the Eagles you are way of base. When you get to this point their focus will to be to play their best no matter what the circumstances are on the other side.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2018 0:27:29 GMT
I disagree. There's nothing like being completely disrespected in life where nobody gives you a chance. That is the Eagles situation right now. They are the #1 seed and nobody gives them a chance. Everybody is pretty much laughing at them. That in my eyes is motivation beyond belief. That's not the Bills, ain't the Rams, ain't the Vikings - it's a #1 seed getting laughed at and disrespected by the masses - and everyone expects them to lose. Talk about disrespect. And I love it  I'm not laughing at them. I feel sorry for them. Like I said, I was enjoying their games, before. When they lost a game and people piled up on them, I said, "come on, everybody can have a bad day including Wentz". Then later Wentz got injured, and I was upset, and said so here. I said "I should feel reassured because my team is in the NFC and the Eagles falling from grace enhances our chances, but no, I actually feel sorry for them." And again, it's not disrespect. It's just being accurate. They *are* playing terribly right now. Will they recover? I doubt. They played terribly against very bad teams. When they face playoff-caliber teams, I'm afraid they will just crumble. So, a team opens up by scoring two TDs on them. Do you really think Foles will stage a comeback? Again, our optimism on behalf of your team is commendable. I just feel that unfortunately it is also very misguided. But hey, if you are right, more power to you, and I'll tip my hat to you. And I like your attitude much more than Christian-Flickinger's who calls others "dense" and say that it is "hilarious" to predict that the Eagles might be one-and-done. No, people are not being dense; they are being accurate; and no, it is not hilarious; it's called reality. I wish your Falcons well too. Talk about going into the Playoffs with something to prove and a chip on your shoulder. Ever see 'Cinderella Man'? Epic boxing movie  Here's my Birds. Jim Braddock - wife, kids, living in poverty, broken hand, can't find work during the Depression Era, threatened with his kids being taken away, the electric shut off.....losing everything. Nobody expects Braddock to win this 'comeback fight' holding onto the hope he can save his life and family What ensues is cinema magic - and these are my Birds  
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2018 0:28:44 GMT
treefrogs If the think any of the players and coaches are overlooking or disrespecting the Eagles you are way of base. When you get to this point their focus will to be to play their best no matter what the circumstances are on the other side. Even Cam Newton? All joking aside - the disrespect comes from the Media. Players can state they don't listen to the radio or read the papers. That's a bunch of BS - especially here in Philly where there's 2 gigantic Sports Talk Radio Stations. It's all over the public airwaves - it's all over TV - nobody gives them a shot. Nobody. They're being laughed at. That to me is motivation in itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdm3 on Jan 4, 2018 0:39:08 GMT
And I like your attitude much more than Christian-Flickinger's who calls others "dense" and say that it is "hilarious" to predict that the Eagles might be one-and-done. No, people are not being dense; they are being accurate; and no, it is not hilarious; it's called reality. "Hilarious" is kinda christian's catchphrase. Everything is "hilarious" to him - everything except Philly's repeated failings.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2018 0:49:58 GMT
And I like your attitude much more than Christian-Flickinger's who calls others "dense" and say that it is "hilarious" to predict that the Eagles might be one-and-done. No, people are not being dense; they are being accurate; and no, it is not hilarious; it's called reality. "Hilarious" is kinda christian's catchphrase. Everything is "hilarious" to him - everything except Philly's repeated failings. I guess it comes down to what one interprets as failure. I completely get the thought process of - if you didn't win the big one you failed. i.e. the Phils in 2009, 2010, 2011 after winning the WS in 2008. Everybody (not just Philly) thought they were going to be the Yankees of the National League. I remember Cole Hamels at the WS Parade getting the crowd in a frenzy stating they were going to do it 'over and over again' - and everybody - not just locally but nationwide agreed. They were a dominant team. The Giants and Cardinals showed them anything can happen in the playoffs. That to me is a failure - those Phils teams who should have won multiple WS Rings. This years Birds? This is gravy. They go one and done - I don't consider it a failure - all because Wentz went down. Wentz has pretty much achieved 'Jesus' status here already where people bow to him like Iverson, Embiid, Cole Hamels, Bernie Parent, Tommy McDonald, and cheesesteaks ............. I look at the next few weeks as 'fun' - what happens happens - your franchise QB is gone for the year. Gravy. Make the best of it 
|
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Jan 4, 2018 1:17:30 GMT
vikings 4-1? are they really that good? Packers fan. Can't stand the Vikes. But if it comes right down to it, I will cheer them on over the Cheaters.
|
|