|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Mar 8, 2017 7:05:59 GMT
A person is either:
1. Male
2. Female
Welcome to science.
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Mar 8, 2017 7:07:43 GMT
a hermaphrodite is both, so confusing
|
|
|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Mar 8, 2017 7:08:48 GMT
a hermaphrodite is both, so confusing Both. As in: 2 genders.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 7:29:31 GMT
There's people who think attack helicopter is a gender. What the hell is up with that?
|
|
|
Post by yezziqa on Mar 8, 2017 7:33:23 GMT
Absolutely true...except for the other ones. Let's just ignore them, they might go away then.
|
|
|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Mar 8, 2017 10:04:28 GMT
There's people who think attack helicopter is a gender. What the hell is up with that? Liberal clowns.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 10:55:35 GMT
Not true...
Noel Coward pointed out there are three genders: Female Male Actor
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 8, 2017 23:18:56 GMT
Not true... Noel Coward pointed out there are three genders: Female Male Actor
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2017 3:46:57 GMT
A person is either: 1. Male 2. Female Welcome to science. Is that what is true, or what you wish were true?
|
|
|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Mar 13, 2017 3:57:37 GMT
A person is either: 1. Male 2. Female Welcome to science. Is that what is true, or what you wish were true? What part of "welcome to science" did you not understand?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 13, 2017 13:06:18 GMT
So please cite the scientific sources.
|
|
|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Mar 16, 2017 5:47:34 GMT
So please cite the scientific sources. Please cite any scientific sources that prove there are 49 genders. Thanks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2017 5:54:09 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2017 5:56:33 GMT
a hermaphrodite is both, so confusing No, a hermaphrodite is a mutation, a deformity caused by the failed formation of twins in the womb.
|
|
|
Post by kls on Mar 16, 2017 11:49:42 GMT
a hermaphrodite is both, so confusing No, a hermaphrodite is a mutation, a deformity caused by the failed formation of twins in the womb. How could that be? A male twin and female twin would be created by two separate eggs. How would they merge into one?
|
|
|
Post by marsexplorer on Mar 16, 2017 12:10:21 GMT
No, a hermaphrodite is a mutation, a deformity caused by the failed formation of twins in the womb. How could that be? A male twin and female twin would be created by two separate eggs. How would they merge into one? Fraternal twins are the product of two eggs, maternal (identical) twins are the result of one egg that splits in two.
|
|
|
Post by kls on Mar 16, 2017 12:12:10 GMT
How could that be? A male twin and female twin would be created by two separate eggs. How would they merge into one? Fraternal twins are the product of two eggs, maternal (identical) twins are the result of one egg that splits in two. Right, that's my point. You wouldn't have a male and a female identical twin. Identical twins are the same gender.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2017 13:53:56 GMT
So please cite the scientific sources. Please cite any scientific sources that prove there are 49 genders. Thanks. I haven't made that claim. Or any claim. You made a claim, though. can you back it up, or can you not? So far it's not.
|
|
|
Post by marsexplorer on Mar 16, 2017 16:00:22 GMT
Fraternal twins are the product of two eggs, maternal (identical) twins are the result of one egg that splits in two. Right, that's my point. You wouldn't have a male and a female identical twin. Identical twins are the same gender. Two eggs can fuse. Read the part about humans. link
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2017 20:22:21 GMT
We're living in an age of such entitled narcissism that people desperately want to conflate individuality with biological distinctiveness. They've dyed their hair, they've got the tats, they've got the piercings and yet the world still isn't noticing them. What else can they do to demand that the world acknowledges their uniqueness? Well, they can be so unique as to deserve their own gender. That's top trumps for biological distinctiveness.
There are two genders. This is a biological fact. That individuals may deviate from them does not mean we send them to the gulag or the concentration camps, it simply means there are biological norms.
Human beings have two eyes. If someone is born with one or three (or even born with two but identifies as a three eyed person), this does not result in a new biologically distinct life-form -- it results in a deviation from the biological norm. That doesn't mean we hate them or want to stop them from working in the local green grocers. It simply means that there are deviations from the norm.
The zealous ideology that we must create a society where every single unique individual is scientifically recognised for their uniqueness is ludicrous. If you want to identify as zeeba and reject the biological norm of your existence, that's fine (no-one's stopping you) but please... for the love of God, do not expect (or demand) that the rest of society adhere to that identity lest it be branded hateful and bigoted.
Your individuality is not the same as biological distinctiveness.
Anyone who says otherwise does not understand (and is a threat to) science.
|
|