|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Mar 9, 2017 17:55:46 GMT
I have to explain the logical implication of your OP before I can explain how dividavi used the same logic to make his post. If you did logic you wouldn't have asked the question as it would've been obvious to you. How does omitting something mean I don't do logic? What did you omit?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 9, 2017 17:58:23 GMT
How does omitting something mean I don't do logic? What did you omit? Not gonna happen you either explain it or don't. And try to keep it under 800 words mr. chatty
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Mar 9, 2017 18:02:55 GMT
Not gonna happen you either explain it or don't. And try to keep it under 800 words mr. chatty Does your mum still have to tie your shoelaces for you, Blade?
|
|
vernuf
Sophomore
@vernuf
Posts: 310
Likes: 34
|
Post by vernuf on Mar 9, 2017 18:29:20 GMT
Not gonna happen you either explain it or don't. And try to keep it under 800 words mr. chatty So again, you've got nothing. Seriously, blade, an intelligent and reasonable person would reexamine their positions upon realizing they don't have anything supporting their positions and realize their positions are probably wrong. You, on the other hand, double down on it.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 9, 2017 18:31:47 GMT
Not gonna happen you either explain it or don't. And try to keep it under 800 words mr. chatty So again, you've got nothing. Seriously, blade, an intelligent and reasonable person would reexamine their positions upon realizing they don't have anything supporting their positions and realize their positions are probably wrong. You, on the other hand, double down on it. My positions are wrong? Tell me how so and be specific.
It should be easy to do since I'm wrong. Remember the point of this thread was asking why gay men are so destructive and they are destructive. That's a fact.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 9, 2017 18:42:35 GMT
Not gonna happen you either explain it or don't. And try to keep it under 800 words mr. chatty So again, you've got nothing. Seriously, blade, an intelligent and reasonable person would reexamine their positions upon realizing they don't have anything supporting their positions and realize their positions are probably wrong. You, on the other hand, double down on it. What's the matter big mouth? Nothing to say now?
Gay men are self destructive that's a fact.
[and I never said all gay men. so don't even attempt that little game]
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 9, 2017 18:49:34 GMT
That's what I thought vernuf. I'm disappointed you didn't at least try to assign me a position/statement I didn't hold or make like Eva was attempting to do.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 9, 2017 18:58:35 GMT
I can't tell if he's going the "because disease" route with the destructive bit or some weird spin on "They're sinning so they're gonna burn so self-destructive because gay". Hard to parse the judgement. But again: if gays are self-destructive because of disease, then heterosexuals have a long history of being self-destructive. If it's the sin thing... meh. That's a Christian interpretation. It pretty much only involves people who believe it.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Mar 9, 2017 19:01:58 GMT
Not gonna happen you either explain it or don't. And try to keep it under 800 words mr. chatty Your OP associates HIV with the "evil ways" of homosexuals. Dividavi used an argumentum ad absurdum to show the idiocy of that implied connection. If you did logic, you would've understood that's what he was doing and wouldn't have asked what you did, therefor the conclusion: you don't do logic. I answered your question, now answer mine: what logical connection are you making in your OP between homosexual acts and HIV?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 9, 2017 19:05:05 GMT
Not gonna happen you either explain it or don't. And try to keep it under 800 words mr. chatty Your OP associates HIV with the "evil ways" of homosexuals. Dividavi used an argumentum ad absurdum to show the idiocy of that implied connection. If you did logic, you would've understood that's what he was doing and wouldn't have asked what you did, therefor the conclusion: you don't do logic. I answered your question, now answer mine: what logical connection are you making in your OP between homosexual acts and HIV? That says it all.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Mar 9, 2017 19:10:34 GMT
Your OP associates HIV with the "evil ways" of homosexuals. Dividavi used an argumentum ad absurdum to show the idiocy of that implied connection. If you did logic, you would've understood that's what he was doing and wouldn't have asked what you did, therefor the conclusion: you don't do logic. I answered your question, now answer mine: what logical connection are you making in your OP between homosexual acts and HIV? That says it all. No, it doesn't. It still doesn't explain at all what the logical connection in your OP is between homosexual acts and HIV. If there is no connection, then it's a non sequitur, which would still mean you don't do logic. So any way you parse this thread: you don't do logic. BTW, I was not trying to "assign you a position/statement I didn't hold;" I was saying you don't do logic because you didn't understand dividavi's comment. Your position has no bearing on your inability to understand the logic behind his post. Even if dividavi himself misunderstood your position it would have no bearing on it. The simple fact that you didn't understand his post is evidence that you don't do logic.
|
|
vernuf
Sophomore
@vernuf
Posts: 310
Likes: 34
|
Post by vernuf on Mar 9, 2017 19:17:39 GMT
So again, you've got nothing. Seriously, blade, an intelligent and reasonable person would reexamine their positions upon realizing they don't have anything supporting their positions and realize their positions are probably wrong. You, on the other hand, double down on it. My positions are wrong? Tell me how so and be specific.
It should be easy to do since I'm wrong. Remember the point of this thread was asking why gay men are so destructive and they are destructive. That's a fact.
The fact you haven't been able to support your positions are why you're wrong. Nor do leading questions make for facts.
|
|
vernuf
Sophomore
@vernuf
Posts: 310
Likes: 34
|
Post by vernuf on Mar 9, 2017 19:19:59 GMT
That's what I thought vernuf. I'm disappointed you didn't at least try to assign me a position/statement I didn't hold or make like Eva was attempting to do. Ah the "I win because he doesn't respond fast enough" argument. Favorite of dishonest cowards everywhere. Especially when you say you win when you haven't given someone any time to respond.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 9, 2017 19:22:12 GMT
No, it doesn't. It still doesn't explain at all what the logical connection in your OP is between homosexual acts and HIV. If there is no connection, then it's a non sequitur, which would still mean you don't do logic. So any way you parse this thread: you don't do logic. BTW, I was not trying to "assign you a position/statement I didn't hold;" I was saying you don't do logic because you didn't understand dividavi's comment. Your position has no bearing on your inability to understand the logic behind his post. Even if dividavi himself misunderstood your position it would have no bearing on it. The simple fact that you didn't understand his post is evidence that you don't do logic. The evil I was referring to are homosexual acts.
No the Op associates homosexual acts with evil. I asked why gay men are so self destructive. That was the whole point of the thread. Divi's point has no bearing on what I said nor does it make me an idiot.
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 9, 2017 19:23:09 GMT
My positions are wrong? Tell me how so and be specific.
It should be easy to do since I'm wrong. Remember the point of this thread was asking why gay men are so destructive and they are destructive. That's a fact.
The fact you haven't been able to support your positions are why you're wrong. Nor do leading questions make for facts. What positions? List them.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Mar 9, 2017 19:23:23 GMT
Has there been any indication of the "Why" behind "self-destructive" or is this just one of the Blade-style "I'll make an assertion then keep insisting no one can DISPROVE it" devices?
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Mar 9, 2017 19:25:45 GMT
No, it doesn't. It still doesn't explain at all what the logical connection in your OP is between homosexual acts and HIV. If there is no connection, then it's a non sequitur, which would still mean you don't do logic. So any way you parse this thread: you don't do logic. BTW, I was not trying to "assign you a position/statement I didn't hold;" I was saying you don't do logic because you didn't understand dividavi's comment. Your position has no bearing on your inability to understand the logic behind his post. Even if dividavi himself misunderstood your position it would have no bearing on it. The simple fact that you didn't understand his post is evidence that you don't do logic. No the Op associates homosexual acts with evil. I asked why gay men are so self destructive. That was the whole point of the thread. Divi's point has no bearing on what I said nor does it make me an idiot. So your OP doesn't include a statistic about HIV and male homosexuals?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 9, 2017 19:26:21 GMT
Has there been any indication of the "Why" behind "self-destructive" or is this just one of the Blade-style "I'll make an assertion then keep insisting no one can DISPROVE it" devices? Are you actually claiming AIDS doesn't cause harm? or that having unprotected sex doesn't?
|
|
blade
Junior Member
@blade
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 636
|
Post by blade on Mar 9, 2017 19:27:11 GMT
No the Op associates homosexual acts with evil. I asked why gay men are so self destructive. That was the whole point of the thread. Divi's point has no bearing on what I said nor does it make me an idiot. So your OP doesn't include a statistic about HIV and male homosexuals? Yes that would be the destructive part.
|
|
vernuf
Sophomore
@vernuf
Posts: 310
Likes: 34
|
Post by vernuf on Mar 9, 2017 19:27:17 GMT
Has there been any indication of the "Why" behind "self-destructive" or is this just one of the Blade-style "I'll make an assertion then keep insisting no one can DISPROVE it" devices? The second.
|
|