|
|
Post by hi224 on Jan 23, 2018 2:34:13 GMT
Yay or nay.
|
|
|
|
Post by jervistetch on Jan 23, 2018 3:05:25 GMT
The real one in London? Yay. Didn't see the Nightingale, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Jan 23, 2018 3:10:24 GMT
The real one in London? Yay. Didn't see the Nightingale, though. the Leslie Howard Movie?.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Jan 23, 2018 3:29:44 GMT
You're the O.P. Why don't you ever go first? You should.
I give it a Yey (or Yea). I reviewed it on the Classic Film Board weekly thread from the old boards. Here's what I said:
Berkeley Square / Frank Lloyd (1933). In “Berkeley Square” Leslie Howard in transported back in time from his own year of 1933 to 1784. He accomplishes this by an alignment of circumstances and wishful thinking (much like the feat was done years later in “Somewhere In Time” (1980)). There, he meets his ancestors, gets in trouble for blurting out things that haven’t happened yet, using strange words and terms that are not understood in the 18th century (“see you later”), and manages to upset the chronology of the past. This film, based on a Broadway play that Howard had made a great success in, is a bit unusual for movies before the ‘60s. The concept of Time Travel in science fiction was not new. H.G. Wells had published his famous novel “The Time Machine” in 1895 (coining the term “time machine”), but until the 1960s, time travel was a rare subject for movies. “Berkeley Square” was remade is several forms before 1960 including a feature film “The House In The Square” (1951). Sometimes the subject is flirted with as in René Clair’s “It Happened Tomorrow” when Dick Powell gets the power to see the next day’s newspaper, but Powell never travels himself and there is a hint of the supernatural. I can’t think of many good examples. The movie is a delight, almost a comedy, but ultimately sad. Recommended.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Jan 23, 2018 3:32:31 GMT
You're the O.P. Why don't you ever go first? You should. I give it a Yey (or Yea). I reviewed it on the Classic Film Board weekly thread from the old boards. Here's what I said: Berkeley Square / Frank Lloyd (1933). In “Berkeley Square” Leslie Howard in transported back in time from his own year of 1933 to 1784. He accomplishes this by an alignment of circumstances and wishful thinking (much like the feat was done years later in “Somewhere In Time” (1980)). There, he meets his ancestors, gets in trouble for blurting out things that haven’t happened yet, using strange words and terms that are not understood in the 18th century (“see you later”), and manages to upset the chronology of the past. This film, based on a Broadway play that Howard had made a great success in, is a bit unusual for movies before the ‘60s. The concept of Time Travel in science fiction was not new. H.G. Wells had published his famous novel “The Time Machine” in 1895 (coining the term “time machine”), but until the 1960s, time travel was a rare subject for movies. “Berkeley Square” was remade is several forms before 1960 including a feature film “The House In The Square” (1951). Sometimes the subject is flirted with as in René Clair’s “It Happened Tomorrow” when Dick Powell gets the power to see the next day’s newspaper, but Powell never travels himself and there is a hint of the supernatural. I can’t think of many good examples. The movie is a delight, almost a comedy, but ultimately sad. Recommended. I found it a tad average, and I don't know what it is about Leslie Howard but he seems so bland to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Jan 23, 2018 3:40:50 GMT
OK, well… I should see it, as it inspired two of my favorite authors—John Dickson Carr ( The Devil in Velvet, Fire, Burn!, Fear is the Same) and H.P. Lovecraft (“The Shadow Out of Time,” The Case of Charles Charles Dexter Ward)—and I actually wrote a story with a similar theme. Yes, yes, I know I have no excuses! Anyhoo… I have seen the remake, The House in the Square, which (despite some fun stuff) I found rather dull, unfortunately. (Power is just not the actor for this kind of material.) And, yes, I know Berkeley Square was on TCM recently—I know, I missed it! What can I say?
|
|
|
|
Post by jervistetch on Jan 23, 2018 3:42:08 GMT
The real one in London? Yay. Didn't see the Nightingale, though. the Leslie Howard Movie?. Oh sorry, hi224. I seriously didn't know that was the name of a movie. Sounds good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Feb 8, 2021 21:23:33 GMT
Took me more than two years, but I finally watched it.
And it’s really good—so much better than the dull ’50s Tyrone Power remake.
As ever, Howard comes off as slightly supercilious but not, somehow, unlikable, a combination that made him perfect for costume dramas. If only his character didn’t keep putting his foot in his mouth with his “predictions”! Heather Angel and Betty Lawford are lovely, and Angel has this unusual charm that fits her character like a glove (she also looks a bit like Frasier’s Jane Leeves, amusingly enough).
The picture is stage bound, but that stage dialogue is a lot of fun. And there’s one wild montage near the end that seems to come out of nowhere (I loved it, natch).
The ending, though, is unusual for this sort of stories—chilly, even a little harsh. Gah, why does Howard’s character make that choice? It kind of prefigures Somewhere in Time’s ending, in fact.
Now, I am a sucker for the time-travel and alternate-universe romance (I’m not sure why…), so I was kinda predisposed to like this, but I’m delighted it’s as good as it is.
Great print on YouTube, by the way:
|
|
|
|
Post by kijii on Feb 8, 2021 21:26:08 GMT
Love to see it but can't find it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Feb 8, 2021 21:50:19 GMT
Love to see it but can't find it. As I wrote above, it’s on YouTube:
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Santa PaulsLaugh on Feb 8, 2021 21:57:33 GMT
Yes. It is very nice.  
|
|
|
|
Post by london777 on Feb 9, 2021 1:28:28 GMT
Who "fell to earth in Berkeley Square"? Clue - it was not David Bowie.
|
|
|
|
Post by london777 on Feb 9, 2021 1:38:57 GMT
... manages to upset the chronology of the past. Ridiculous! This would tear the fabric of the space-time continuum, causing a reverse singularity and tying string theory in reef-knots. The only solution wou;d be to distract God's attention by challenging Him to an endless and ever-accelerating game of tic-tac-toe.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Feb 9, 2021 2:04:58 GMT
... manages to upset the chronology of the past. Ridiculous! This would tear the fabric of the space-time continuum, causing a reverse singularity and tying string theory in reef-knots. The only solution wou;d be to distract God's attention by challenging Him to an endless and ever-accelerating game of tic-tac-toe. I believe that the writers of this film were time travelers themselves. They set up this paradox just so future message boards and movie sites could use up gigabytes of storage from fans arguing over it.
|
|
|
|
Post by timshelboy on Feb 9, 2021 7:22:56 GMT
a bit disappointed ,...... and I usually give time travel romances a pass...but it was better than the Tyrone Power remake.
|
|