|
Post by msdemos on Feb 6, 2018 17:21:33 GMT
SAVE FERRIS
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Feb 7, 2018 16:10:54 GMT
Definitely a patsy.
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on Feb 7, 2018 16:44:15 GMT
I'll go with option number 1. One of the reasons is listed on page 5 (arabic 5, not roman) in the lower half: archive.org/details/WarrenCommissionReportThe Report claims that" Not more than 2 minutes had elapsed since the shooting" as officer Baker and Roy Truly dashed up the stairs. (Not included but implied that moments later) On the 2nd floor Baker saw someone in a room through the window in a door. Behind a closed door was Oswald. So let's be generous and add to the time given by the Commission and let's make it 3 minutes when they met Oswald. That means, if Oswald did it alone, he had to hide the gun, go down to the 2nd from the 6th floor (so 4 floors), go inside that room and act normal when Baker & Truly saw him. 3 mins is more than enough if you run down the stairs and just try to be as fast as possible. Problem is, it's not discreet and it's not far fetched to say that people would notice. Somehow nothing (I'm still getting through the report) is said about people noticing someone rushing down stairs. Maybe he used the elevators but he was lucky to get there quickly. It's just that the "window" of time was pretty small. Also, why wait until the car was making a descent in a curve to shoot instead of shooting while the car was coming towards him in a straight line on Houston street? I'm no sharpshooter nor gun expert but why go for the difficult shot when you had the chance to get it done on an easy one? Those are just questions to which we may never get an answer but the bottom line is I'm in the conspiracy "camp".
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Feb 10, 2018 22:29:50 GMT
Also, why wait until the car was making a descent in a curve to shoot instead of shooting while the car was coming towards him in a straight line on Houston street? I'm no sharpshooter nor gun expert but why go for the difficult shot when you had the chance to get it done on an easy one? Those are just questions to which we may never get an answer but the bottom line is I'm in the conspiracy "camp". Simple as hell. When the car is coming at you, who is in you line of sight? Governor Connelly and the driver. Going away, the back of Kennedy's head. Even if you have a sight of Kennedy's head, you always have the chance of Connelly moving and getting in the way. I'm not a USMC sharpshooter, but I have shot a rifle loads of time. The shot that Oswald took was fairly easy. Kennedy isn't moving (left to right or vice versa) but receding. Get him in your sight, distance doesn't matter. Nothing is for sure, but Oswald alone crosses the most T's and dots the most I's.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Feb 11, 2018 22:12:29 GMT
Oswald acting alone. BUT, I think there was something in motion and he coincided with this other larger scheme that was at work in the shadows. If that makes sense and doesn't generate a picture of me with a tinfoil hat on my head.
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Feb 12, 2018 7:00:30 GMT
ill say conspiracy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2018 16:07:13 GMT
One thing I never hear is that there could have been more than one shooter without there having been any conspiracy. Kennedy was in a perfect location to be killed by any number of assassins who might have converged on the same area at the same time for the same purpose, each one believing that he was the only assassin. It was a perfect spot to do it because there were so many hidden spots. So maybe Oswald took a shot from the School Book Depository building and somebody else fired from the grassy knoll, each not knowing of the other's presence, while other would-be assassins may have been hiding behind windows or on rooftops waiting to take a shot. I am reminded of a line from the movie "JFK" in which investigators are examining the room from which Oswald was said to have fired. One of the investigators looks across the street at the windows of other buildings and says "It's a turkey shoot".
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Feb 13, 2018 15:23:07 GMT
On the other hand, my wife's uncle was present a few days before the assassination when JFK visited Houston, TX and let's just say security for the President is not what it is today. Open windows everywhere and JFK's motorcade went slowly through downtown. See this photo for example. He could have been picked off very easily in Houston as well, although I don't think Houston was as hostile of an environment as Dallas was.
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Feb 13, 2018 15:24:43 GMT
I basically don't buy the notion of ANY large-scale, secret conspiracies.
|
|
|
Post by koskiewicz on Feb 16, 2018 16:21:34 GMT
I qualified as an expert with the M16 in the Army.
There is no way in hell that Oswald could have pulled that off with an inferior Manlicher Carcano bolt action Italian made rifle.
It was clearly more than one shooter, and I have doubts that Oswald was one of them.
|
|
|
Post by Jep Gambardella on Feb 16, 2018 19:40:03 GMT
I will have to go with "conspiracy". Not because of any technical details about the shooting, but because of how Oswald was killed shortly afterwards. There is just no satisfactory explanation for Jack Ruby killing Oswald that doesn't involve a conspiracy.
|
|