|
Post by DSDSquared on Oct 15, 2018 19:43:11 GMT
No it does not. A DNR can be for a multitude of conditions. Patients can and do absolutely choose to die. No, actually a DNR doesn't even apply to comas or multitude of conditions. A DNR only applies to 2 conditions:1. The patient stops breathing. or 2. The patient's heart stops beating. All a DNR does is say do not administer CPR in those 2 situations. That's all. Do-not-resuscitate orderDo not resuscitateDo not resuscitate orderNeither of those cases applied to Killmonger. Bottom line: T'Challa executed Killmonger without any trial. So once again, you got it wrong, just like you got it wrong with Shady Brady's cheating in DeflateGate. Dude, you are wrong here. Sorry. I have worked in the medical field at the Executive level for over 18 years. The point here is that patients absolutely can choose to die. They can outright refuse care. There are more ways to do this besides a DNR, I was just trying to keep it simple for you and not get into a dissertation about why this is not illegal, but you are such a dumb shit that you make me have to explain myself more. Ever heard of patients leaving against medical advice (AMA)? It is true that if we feel a patient is a harm to themselves or others that we can hold them against their will, but this refers to suicidal behavior, not an instance like this. If a patient has life threatening injuries and refuses treatment, that is within his/her patient rights and there is not much that we can do unless we feel the patient is not mentally capable of making their own sound decisions.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Oct 15, 2018 21:29:39 GMT
DSD said it applied to a multitude of instances, which it does, the 2 things you listed are the only reasons you would need to resuscitate a patient because if they are breathing and heart is beating then you don't need to resuscitate them, but why their heart or breathing stopped can be for a multitude of reasons And none of that applies to Killmonger since Killmogner's heart was still beating and Killmonger was still breathing so no CPR needed and therefore DNR doesn't apply to Killmonger, which means DSD is wrong on this, just like he was wrong on Shady Brady's cheating in DeflateGate. T'Challa did not execute Killmonger, Execution is stated as to carry out a sentence of death on (a legally condemned person) No, execution can be used to describe the killing of an unarmed person who is unable to defend himself or herself. For example, a witness testifies against a mobster, the mobster kidnaps the witness and takes him to a remote location, forces the witness to kneel down, then shoots the witness in the back of the head. The cops say the victim was killed "execution-style" and call the crime a mob "execution". T'Challa did not have Killmonger under arrest or incapacitated as to where he could not defend himself Killmonger had a spear stuck through his chest and was unarmed. That pretty much qualifies as being unable to defend himself. Killmonger made his own intention to kill T'Challa clear T'Challa's landing a mortal blow to Killmonger is neither and execution or murder but self defence That's not self-defense. Self-defense requires the person defending himself to be in imminent danger. For example, if an armed robber tries to rob a grocery store and the owner manages to pull out a gun from under the counter and shoot and kill the armed robber before the armed robber shoots him, that's self-defense and is legal. But if the owner shot the armed robber and the armed robber was injured but not killed and the owner managed to disarm the robber and the robber is just lying on the ground with a bullet wound but still alive, the owner isn't allowed to shoot the robber again and kill him. That's not self-defense. That's murder. And that's basically what T'Challa did. Now if you want to argue that T'Challa had the right to execute Killmonger without a trial since T'Challa was the King, then you would have a valid argument (although the execution of a US citizen without a trial could create problems in foreign relations). But to claim that it wasn't an execution is a stupid and invalid argument. T'Challa landed the final blow during a fight against an opponent of equal powers and weapon/armory making it a fair fight, T'Challa after landing this blow IN SELF DEFENCE does not I repeat DOES NOT take any further actions to harm Killmonger at all, all he does is carry his cousin to see the sunset over their homeland, Killmonger I repeat KILLMONGER you fucking spastic refuses medical treatment then pulls the dagger out of his chest himself causing him to die almost instantly, Killmonger kills himself after T'Challa offers him medical help. T'Challa does not strike, stab, slash, grab, pummel, pound, stomp, strangle, crush, kick, headbutt or fucking leg drop Killmonger after setting him down to watch the sunset, all he does is offer him medical attention which his cousin refuses and kills himself.
Do you comprehend this you utter waste of spunk and oxygen?
And yes I know Execution has another meaning as you said but still an execution ultimately boils down to the intentional killing of a helpless or restrained person by another who is in no imminent danger from the executed, basically if you are at someone's mercy and they kill you it's an execution, doesn't count when the killing blow comes during a fight to the death with an up to that point able bodied and dangerous opponent you shit stain.
|
|