|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Feb 17, 2018 22:41:27 GMT
...is working on ‘Incredibles 2’. Oh, and most people blame Damon Lindelof for what happened with ‘Tomorrowland’... And not doing live action... And let's see how Lindelof is doing... Yep still working...
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Feb 17, 2018 22:53:22 GMT
...is working on ‘Incredibles 2’. Oh, and most people blame Damon Lindelof for what happened with ‘Tomorrowland’... And not doing live action... And let's see how Lindelof is doing... Yep still working... 1. Everyone was asking for ‘Incredibles 2’, so it was only a matter of time. 2. As a showrunner of an upcoming TV series, not a writer. He needs someone else to write the 3rd act.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Feb 17, 2018 22:57:27 GMT
1. Everyone was asking for ‘Incredibles 2’, so it was only a matter of time. 2. As a showrunner of an upcoming TV series, not a writer. He needs someone else to write the 3rd act. 1. Pixar didnt want to do sequels 2. Yes he does.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Feb 17, 2018 23:00:12 GMT
1. Everyone was asking for ‘Incredibles 2’, so it was only a matter of time. 2. As a showrunner of an upcoming TV series, not a writer. He needs someone else to write the 3rd act. 1. Pixar didnt want to do sequels 2. Yes he does. 1. ‘Incredibles 2’ was announced in 2014, so your implication falls flat. 2. Show me the proof or it’s not happening.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Feb 17, 2018 23:06:43 GMT
1. ‘Incredibles 2’ was announced in 2014, so your implication falls flat. 2. Show me the proof or it’s not happening. 1. No Pixar said it didn't want to do them. 2. I was agreeing-he needs help (mental help too).
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Feb 17, 2018 23:10:58 GMT
1. ‘Incredibles 2’ was announced in 2014, so your implication falls flat. 2. Show me the proof or it’s not happening. 1. No Pixar said it didn't want to do them. 2. I was agreeing-he needs help (mental help too). In any case, ‘Incredibles 2’ being made has absolutely no relations to ‘Tomorrowland’.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Feb 17, 2018 23:18:05 GMT
In any case, ‘Incredibles 2’ being made has absolutely no relations to ‘Tomorrowland’. No probably not.
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Feb 17, 2018 23:32:31 GMT
In highlight of the recent mcu movies and the growing complains of the over reliance of cgi, how would you fix the problem. this is how I will go forward with it. 1, focus more on a deeper story which should result to little but more realistic use of cgi 2, Make the movies a lot more grounded. 3, realise that you do not need ooc colours and a cartoonish look to sell a movie to children 4, Better Cinematography. 1) So basically don't try to be wondrous or open-minded. 2) So basically be creatively bankrupt 3) So use boring and dull colors 4) Nah, they're fine as is. Better than anything Fox or WB gives us. FOX-Men fans better look at their own garbage franchise. The CGI rubbish final fight between Professor Saban and his X-Rangers Vs. Ivan Ooze was GODDAMN AWFUL!!!
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Feb 17, 2018 23:42:03 GMT
mcu moves have bad cgi today and i think it is done on purpose to make their films more appealing to children. please watch a movie like X2 that was 15 years ago that movie had better cgi than most, if not all the mcu movies. this is a good example this film was 15 years ago and the cgi holds up better than the current mcu movies probably because this movie is a lot more grounded and as realistic as possible for people with special powers. The cgi in Black Panther could and should have been better. No, that scene from X2 was boring. You want a real fight with teleporting and going all over the place look at Dr Strange. Grounded....grounded is bad. It's from people ashamed of comics and it's FOR people shamed of comics. Plus X2 had awful CGI in the Deathstrike Vs Wolverine fight as well as the awful CGI tornados during the blackbird sequence after Bobby's House, Magneto's laughable escape from prison on a steel pizza plate and of course the scene where Stryker just by looking at "Wolverine" at Alkali Lake realized that it wasn't him and then Mystique doing that awful kick manuever/transformation thing. I remember bursting out into laughter in the theater in 2003 at how bad those last 2 scenes were and still are.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Feb 17, 2018 23:52:09 GMT
Other than a few notable action scenes (Nightcrawler hallway fight and Quicksilver scenes for example) the Fox-men movies had pretty crappy fight scenes, at least compared to DC and MCU.
DC action scenes are shot awesomely and epic but have a tendency to be redundant and choreography is pretty lacking. MCU action scenes have great choreography and lots of intricacies, problem is with how they're shot. Whether it's shaky cam or too close up or lighting/colors are too bright, etc.
X-men action scenes on the other hand... they're just blah. They neither have the polished feel of the DC movies nor the tight choreography of MCU movies.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on Feb 18, 2018 0:03:42 GMT
I remember bursting out into laughter in the theater in 2003 at how bad those last 2 scenes were and still are. How could you possibly remember that when you were not even alive in 2003???
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Feb 18, 2018 0:06:12 GMT
I remember bursting out into laughter in the theater in 2003 at how bad those last 2 scenes were and still are. How could you possibly remember that when you were not even alive in 2003??? I was born in 1981.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Feb 18, 2018 1:40:39 GMT
I would still say that critics are a lot more reliable since, if we go by user reviews, ‘Black Panther’ would be on par with ‘Twilight’, which is clearly not... No because critics get paid and they also have to factor in not saying things that might offend the studio. User reviews can be more honest and reliable depending on how it is worded. Usually the unreliable reviews would be less articulate. The Last Jedi being the perfect example of that disconnect. A movie has to be more relevant to audiences than critics otherwise what is it? Certainly not art. If Shakespeare wrote only for critics what good would that be. He wrote for the masses. A lot of people don't realize that a lot of Shakespeare was really quite crude and dirty. He included sex jokes in his stuff, like Othello.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Feb 18, 2018 1:43:16 GMT
A lot of people don't realize that a lot of Shakespeare was really quite crude and dirty. He included sex jokes in his stuff, like Othello. But he also was profoundly philosophical, more so than many modern movies combined.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Feb 18, 2018 1:46:31 GMT
A lot of people don't realize that a lot of Shakespeare was really quite crude and dirty. He included sex jokes in his stuff, like Othello. But he also was profoundly philosophical, more so than many modern movies combined. Eh....even his plays had their stupid moments. His real skill wasn't philosophy, it was his clever wordplay.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Feb 18, 2018 1:54:09 GMT
Eh....even his plays had their stupid moments. His real skill wasn't philosophy, it was his clever wordplay. Eh he is quoted much more that MCU movies. There are more things in Heaven and Earth Horatio, etc...
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Feb 18, 2018 2:12:35 GMT
Eh....even his plays had their stupid moments. His real skill wasn't philosophy, it was his clever wordplay. Eh he is quoted much more that MCU movies. There are more things in Heaven and Earth Horatio, etc... A lot of people who quote him now don't even fully realize what a lot of his dialog even meant. Like the whole "Get thee to a Nunnery" thing from Hamlet...how many folks know Hamlet is calling Ophelia a whore?
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Feb 18, 2018 2:24:29 GMT
A lot of people who quote him now don't even fully realize what a lot of his dialog even meant. Like the whole "Get thee to a Nunnery" thing from Hamlet...how many folks know Hamlet is calling Ophelia a whore? Yes but do they really need to? Frailty, thy name is woman. To be or not to be All the world ‘s a stage, and all the men and women merely players. ‘Some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them.’ You have to admit there's more zip to those than "I am Iron man!"
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Feb 18, 2018 2:26:24 GMT
A lot of people who quote him now don't even fully realize what a lot of his dialog even meant. Like the whole "Get thee to a Nunnery" thing from Hamlet...how many folks know Hamlet is calling Ophelia a whore? Yes but do they really need to? Yes. Sexist. This one also had a different meaning than most attribute to it. Eh, this isn't that profound. Not profound either. More an obvious truth.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Feb 18, 2018 2:35:09 GMT
Um who said art had to be politically correct? And the point of a line is a reflection of truth in a way that is memorably worded, whether it is obvious or not. The more obvious the better in fact, since it would be things about daily life and experience. "I am Iron man," does not make the grade.
|
|