Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2018 1:48:30 GMT
You wouldn't understand, Goz. It's a sort of a Bible joke. Then again, I suppose that means I shouldn't have applied it to Gadreel since he probably didn't get the reference. Why not add patronising to the litany of sins of arrogance and self-delusion? Because that would be redundant. But I got it, Goz. I'm really, really arrogant. Probably moreso today because I really hate....how do I say this without continuing to draw your disdain...."what happened here today" is what I'll call it. I find very little in life more repulsive than what happened here today. For the record, "The Lord rebuke you" was something that was spoken to the devil. When I say you wouldn't understand, I didn't mean to patronize you I simply meant that your LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL response was, understandably, a misunderstanding of what I was saying. And that's understandable because it's an obscure verse. And that's all I meant by saying that to you. You seemed to think I was being melodramatic about the rebuking stuff when my intent was "witty." As for the second sentence of my post above that you want to attribute to my hubris, I stand by it. Gadreel is an imposter. |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 26, 2018 2:16:26 GMT
Why not add patronising to the litany of sins of arrogance and self-delusion? Because that would be redundant. But I got it, Goz. I'm really, really arrogant. Probably moreso today because I really hate....how do I say this without continuing to draw your disdain...."what happened here today" is what I'll call it. I find very little in life more repulsive than what happened here today. For the record, "The Lord rebuke you" was something that was spoken to the devil. When I say you wouldn't understand, I didn't mean to patronize you I simply meant that your LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL response was, understandably, a misunderstanding of what I was saying. And that's understandable because it's an obscure verse. And that's all I meant by saying that to you. You seemed to think I was being melodramatic about the rebuking stuff when my intent was "witty." As for the second sentence of my post above that you want to attribute to my hubris, I stand by it. Gadreel is an imposter. Points noted. You only feel that Gadreel is an imposter in your God club, an outsider in the cosy 'them' and us' or the tribalism of religion, and its your duty to maintain its fortress, because he has a different interpretation to yours and DARES to challenge yours. Did I forget smug? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 26, 2018 2:26:02 GMT
Because that would be redundant. But I got it, Goz. I'm really, really arrogant. Probably moreso today because I really hate....how do I say this without continuing to draw your disdain...."what happened here today" is what I'll call it. I find very little in life more repulsive than what happened here today. For the record, "The Lord rebuke you" was something that was spoken to the devil. When I say you wouldn't understand, I didn't mean to patronize you I simply meant that your LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL response was, understandably, a misunderstanding of what I was saying. And that's understandable because it's an obscure verse. And that's all I meant by saying that to you. You seemed to think I was being melodramatic about the rebuking stuff when my intent was "witty." As for the second sentence of my post above that you want to attribute to my hubris, I stand by it. Gadreel is an imposter. Points noted. You only feel that Gadreel is an imposter in your God club, an outsider in the cosy 'them' and us' or the tribalism of religion, and its your duty to maintain its fortress, because he has a different interpretation to yours and DARES to challenge yours. No, I feel anyone who doesn't believe in the truth of the Bible should stop trying to teach the Bible. It has nothing to do with forming a fortress of or for a religion. Don't mix me up with my Hebrew ancestors in that regard. Christianity is a free "club," and all are welcome in, but once you're in, don't try to sell merchandise or you'll get run out by true zealots. No, that's a synonym for "arrogant," so it's been noted thrice now. You did forget "lovably annoying" though. |
|
|
|
Post by deembastille on Feb 26, 2018 2:28:55 GMT
wow. Really? Look honestly if you want to bear arms fine, but surely a check on your sanity and a registration of the gun is not a big ask? Yeah, nothing bad can happen when guns are registered. If someone wants background checks to include better mental health screening then that's a conversation that can be had. But the truth is that this most recent shooting is the fault of the shooter, the Sheriff's Department and the FBI. Trying to deflect the blame anywhere else is pathetically ridiculous. Adam lanza's mother owned all the guns he used. the gun that he killed her with, the guns he killed the 20 babies with, the guns he killed 6 teachers with, the gun he killed himself with. and he didn't own a gun or have a gun registered in his name. point: checking mental health of a gun owner does jack shit if the guns go home to another mental person. |
|
|
|
Post by goz on Feb 26, 2018 3:03:19 GMT
Points noted. You only feel that Gadreel is an imposter in your God club, an outsider in the cosy 'them' and us' or the tribalism of religion, and its your duty to maintain its fortress, because he has a different interpretation to yours and DARES to challenge yours. No, I feel anyone who doesn't believe in the truth of the Bible should stop trying to teach the Bible. It has nothing to do with forming a fortress of or for a religion. Don't mix me up with my Hebrew ancestors in that regard. Christianity is a free "club," and all are welcome in, but once you're in, don't try to sell merchandise or you'll get run out by true zealots. No, that's a synonym for "arrogant," so it's been noted thrice now. You did forget "lovably annoying" though. ...and YOU forget that there is no agreement amongst Christians about an absolute truth in the Bible. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 26, 2018 16:50:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Feb 26, 2018 16:54:21 GMT
Why would I be interested in redacting history? |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 26, 2018 16:58:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Feb 26, 2018 17:04:29 GMT
how did my post redact history of the Crusades? |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 26, 2018 17:06:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Feb 26, 2018 17:18:11 GMT
Not true. I do absolve myself of it and think it's funny when i am blamed for something that happened so long ago. But the history hasn't changed by my hand in the slightest. I'm actually relieved that it talkes going back a thousand years before I'm found guilty of something. The Crusades are pretty interesting and it's a shame that no one actually cares about the Crusades except as a tagline for my culpability in it. Do you want to talk about them?  |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 26, 2018 17:27:30 GMT
tpfkar Not true. I do absolve myself of it and think it's funny when i am blamed for something that happened so long ago. But the history hasn't changed by my hand in the slightest. I'm actually relieved that it talkes going back a thousand years before I'm found guilty of something. The Crusades are pretty interesting and it's a shame that no one actually cares about the Crusades except as a tagline for my culpability in it. Do you want to talk about them? Let's play your inane game a bit longer - who blamed you for the crusades?  And here you try to redact the current, too.  In this day and age we still have religion getting people doing positively obscene things like actually supporting that children should be destroyed for the sins of their parents. Talk about utter depravity. And I talk about anything I feel like, and pretty much nada else. 
I would say that God wouldn't care one way or another as long as they are treated fairly...which is why there is instruction on it to begin with. The fact is that a slave could be an overseer in the congregation his master goes to because Scripture makes pretty clear that everyone has equal rights within the church if not in society. |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Feb 26, 2018 17:37:23 GMT
tpfkar Not true. I do absolve myself of it and think it's funny when i am blamed for something that happened so long ago. But the history hasn't changed by my hand in the slightest. I'm actually relieved that it talkes going back a thousand years before I'm found guilty of something. The Crusades are pretty interesting and it's a shame that no one actually cares about the Crusades except as a tagline for my culpability in it. Do you want to talk about them? Let's play your inane game a bit longer - who blamed you for the crusades? And here you try to redact the current, too. In this day and age we still have religion getting people doing positively obscene things like actually supporting that children should be destroyed for the sins of their parents. Talk about utter depravity. And I talk about anything I feel like, and pretty much nada else.
I would say that God wouldn't care one way or another as long as they are treated fairly...which is why there is instruction on it to begin with. The fact is that a slave could be an overseer in the congregation his master goes to because Scripture makes pretty clear that everyone has equal rights within the church if not in society.The game was started by you. When did I redact the Crusades and for that matter, what would i stand to gain by doing so? Maybe I wasn't blamed and Farber was just bring it up on a whim. I'll apologize to the dude once i get clarification. I already forgive you for saying something stupid so no worries. As a Christian, it's kinda automatic. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 26, 2018 17:44:47 GMT
tpfkar Let's play your inane game a bit longer - who blamed you for the crusades? And here you try to redact the current, too. In this day and age we still have religion getting people doing positively obscene things like actually supporting that children should be destroyed for the sins of their parents. Talk about utter depravity. And I talk about anything I feel like, and pretty much nada else.
I would say that God wouldn't care one way or another as long as they are treated fairly...which is why there is instruction on it to begin with. The fact is that a slave could be an overseer in the congregation his master goes to because Scripture makes pretty clear that everyone has equal rights within the church if not in society.The game was started by you. When did I redact the Crusades and for that matter, what would i stand to gain by doing so? Maybe I wasn't blamed and Farber was just bring it up on a whim. I'll apologize to the dude once i get clarification. I already forgive you for saying something stupid so no worries. As a Christian, it's kinda automatic. You're a liar.  For your second sentence, reread as many times as you need to. Maybe you can work with "redact" with 1/10th of your patent elasticity like here with "blame". And I didn't say anything stupid. Just responded to religious-inspired depravity, and the dumb that lets it flourish.
The destruction of the wicked is literal and as a collective they make up the heavens and the earth that people think don't change. |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Feb 26, 2018 18:25:56 GMT
tpfkar The game was started by you. When did I redact the Crusades and for that matter, what would i stand to gain by doing so? Maybe I wasn't blamed and Farber was just bring it up on a whim. I'll apologize to the dude once i get clarification. I already forgive you for saying something stupid so no worries. As a Christian, it's kinda automatic. You're a liar. For your second sentence, reread as many times as you need to. Maybe you can work with "redact" with 1/10th of your patent elasticity like here with "blame". And I didn't say anything stupid. Just responded to religious-inspired depravity, and the dumb that lets it flourish.
The destruction of the wicked is literal and as a collective they make up the heavens and the earth that people think don't change.How am I a liar again. You would do better with less words. Why was my statement about the Crusades a redacting of history? |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 26, 2018 18:32:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Feb 26, 2018 18:43:29 GMT
I've read that so i guess you are trying to say you don;t know what redacted means? |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Feb 26, 2018 18:49:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kls on Feb 27, 2018 13:19:28 GMT
Your religious affiliation doesn't determine your desire to own a gun. The want to be able to kill someone does. Someone once asked me, "What if an armed robber breaks into your house? Wouldn't you want a gun to protect you?" My answer was, no. Because I don't want to kill an armed robber that breaks into my house. I don't want to kill anyone for any reason. And that is one of the two determining factors that go into whether a person will own a gun. The two are: 1. The willingness to kill in self-defense (The want to be able to kill someone). 2. Fear. Isn't fear of an armed robber reasonable? |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Feb 27, 2018 13:27:30 GMT
Your religious affiliation doesn't determine your desire to own a gun. The want to be able to kill someone does. Someone once asked me, "What if an armed robber breaks into your house? Wouldn't you want a gun to protect you?" My answer was, no. Because I don't want to kill an armed robber that breaks into my house. I don't want to kill anyone for any reason. And that is one of the two determining factors that go into whether a person will own a gun. The two are: 1. The willingness to kill in self-defense (The want to be able to kill someone). 2. Fear. Isn't fear of an armed robber reasonable? Not really. Our fears should not automatically mean another person;s death. however, that doesn't mean you aren't prepared for the extremely remote possibility of a home invasion. That's the part of the argument that annoys me is the notion that either you have a gun or you can be murdered. |
|
