|
Post by scabab on Mar 17, 2018 21:34:51 GMT
Lol "Wonder Woman's reviews are too high because of reasons and Black Panthers are too low because of reasons."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2018 21:46:44 GMT
WW is overrated but still good. I prefer MOS and BvS UE.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Mar 17, 2018 21:56:39 GMT
The difference for Wonder Woman is only 4% (92% by critics and 88% by audience). So we can say with certainty that there's a general consensus that Wonder Woman is a 90% movie. Still trying to find a way in which Wonder Woman remains top eh. So I guess if this is your new angle you have to concede that Spider-Man Homecoming (92%/88%) and Civil War (91/89 ) are as good as WW , and Avengers (92/91), Iron Man (94/91) and Guardians Of The Galaxy (91/92) are all better. Otherwise that whole post of yours was utterly meaningless and wrong, and once again, you have been owned. DC-Fanboy continuously runs into this problem. He searches for some angle where a DC movie comes out on top, but invariably that angle ends up benefiting MCU movies more when it is applied to them. The greatest superhero movie of all time list ... FAIL. Black Panther is #1. Chinese critics are more reliable ... FAIL. They rated most MCU films over Wonder Woman. And now this - averaging critic and audience ratings from RT ... FAIL. MCU films again dominate Wonder Woman. The poor guy’s only recourse is to cover his head with a pillow and pretend that none of these conflicts exist. You often see disturbed children behave in such a manner. Fortunately, they still have time to get it corrected before adulthood.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 17, 2018 23:04:33 GMT
Given that A Wrinkle in Time hasn’t been well received, shouldn’t that put an end to this idea that critics will like anything solely on the grounds of if it empowers women or non-whites? Feminist/SJW critics aren’t completely stupid. They’re not going to give a very bad film a good review. That would be too obviously agenda driven. But they could get away with giving a mediocre film a better review than it deserves. WW certainly benefited from some girl-power reviews, but I think it also benefited from some pity reviews. You know, like when the dumb kid finally scores a C+ on a test and receives a disproportionate amount of adulation from the adults. DC is that kid. Wonder Woman is the C+. That’s an interesting theory right there. I take it you have evidence to back up your claims?
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 17, 2018 23:07:26 GMT
The Wonder Woman reviews were accurate Accurately inflated. BP made history for the secret conspiracies to downvote it because of the racists. Thus is the result. If WW had an inflated score, wouldn’t that mean that BP’s score was also inflated? You can’t have it both ways. Also, why didn’t AWIT receive those “inflated” scores?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2018 0:03:11 GMT
Accurately inflated. BP made history for the secret conspiracies to downvote it because of the racists. Thus is the result. If WW had an inflated score, wouldn’t that mean that BP’s score was also inflated? You can’t have it both ways. Also, why didn’t AWIT receive those “inflated” scores? Obviously BP's review scores were inflated as well. AWIT didn't receive the same inflated scores because it is shit.
|
|
|
Post by formersamhmd on Mar 18, 2018 0:23:18 GMT
Accurately inflated. BP made history for the secret conspiracies to downvote it because of the racists. Thus is the result. If WW had an inflated score, wouldn’t that mean that BP’s score was also inflated? You can’t have it both ways. Also, why didn’t AWIT receive those “inflated” scores? Maybe BP's were, but then that would also mean Dark Knights' were too along with WW. AWIT was just bad enough it couldn't even rely on inflated scores.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 18, 2018 0:30:47 GMT
If WW had an inflated score, wouldn’t that mean that BP’s score was also inflated? You can’t have it both ways. Also, why didn’t AWIT receive those “inflated” scores? Maybe BP's were, but then that would also mean Dark Knights' were too along with WW. AWIT was just bad enough it couldn't even rely on inflated scores. First off, how would that suggest that TDK had inflated scores? You need to stop using Heath Ledger’s death as a scapegoat. It’s disgusting. That has nothing to do with critics being afraid of being accused of racism or sexism. Second, your “point” about AWIT makes no sense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2018 0:37:33 GMT
Maybe BP's were, but then that would also mean Dark Knights' were too along with WW. AWIT was just bad enough it couldn't even rely on inflated scores. Second, your “point” about AWIT makes no sense. Of course it makes sense. Critics don't mind over-hyping a movie that's at least okay but they don't want to make themselves look like complete idiots by giving a bad movie 8/10 (aside from Armond White).
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 18, 2018 0:42:14 GMT
Second, your “point” about AWIT makes no sense. Of course it makes sense. Critics don't mind over-hyping a movie that's at least okay but they don't want to make themselves look like complete idiots by giving a bad movie 8/10 (aside from Armond White). They don’t have to give it an 8/10. They could just say that it’s a passable film and move on. Besides, why would a bunch of professional critics have to worry about looking like idiots for giving a movie a good review?
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Mar 18, 2018 0:43:06 GMT
Given that A Wrinkle in Time hasn’t been well received, shouldn’t that put an end to this idea that critics will like anything solely on the grounds of if it empowers women or non-whites? I mean never should've been a possibility anyway.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2018 0:44:31 GMT
Of course it makes sense. Critics don't mind over-hyping a movie that's at least okay but they don't want to make themselves look like complete idiots by giving a bad movie 8/10 (aside from Armond White). They don’t have to give it an 8/10. They could just say that it’s a passable film and move on. Besides, why would a bunch of professional critics have to worry about looking like idiots for giving a movie a good review? Because they want to be taken seriously? Because they want their readers to be able to trust their opinion? ![](https://s26.postimg.org/gf93ycxax/giveup.gif)
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 18, 2018 0:50:06 GMT
They don’t have to give it an 8/10. They could just say that it’s a passable film and move on. Besides, why would a bunch of professional critics have to worry about looking like idiots for giving a movie a good review? Because they want to be taken seriously? Because they want their readers to be able to trust their opinion? ![](https://s26.postimg.org/gf93ycxax/giveup.gif) So critics abide by what their readers want to hear?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2018 0:55:59 GMT
Because they want to be taken seriously? Because they want their readers to be able to trust their opinion? ![](https://s26.postimg.org/gf93ycxax/giveup.gif) So critics abide by what their readers want to hear? Where did I say that? ![](https://s26.postimg.org/5hoy7902h/confused.gif)
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 18, 2018 0:57:45 GMT
So critics abide by what their readers want to hear? Where did I say that? ![](https://s26.postimg.org/5hoy7902h/confused.gif)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2018 1:02:51 GMT
Where did I say that? ![](https://s26.postimg.org/5hoy7902h/confused.gif) Dude, if you think that is the same as "critics abiding by what their audience wants to here," then you have serious problems with comprehension. ![](https://s26.postimg.org/m8f14k0ih/yes.gif)
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 18, 2018 1:05:25 GMT
Dude, if you think that is the same as "critics abiding by what their audience wants to here," then you have serious problems with comprehension. ![](https://s26.postimg.org/m8f14k0ih/yes.gif) That’s the only way your argument would really make sense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2018 1:07:00 GMT
Dude, if you think that is the same as "critics abiding by what their audience wants to here," then you have serious problems with comprehension. ![](https://s26.postimg.org/m8f14k0ih/yes.gif) That’s the only way your argument would really make sense. Try explaining why you think that is.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 18, 2018 1:10:03 GMT
That’s the only way your argument would really make sense. Try explaining why you think that is. Just as soon as you explain why you think critics are some kind of hive-mind who universally agreed to “inflate” the score for WW for “SJW” reasons.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2018 1:32:12 GMT
Try explaining why you think that is. Just as soon as you explain why you think critics are some kind of hive-mind who universally agreed to “inflate” the score for WW for “SJW” reasons. Dude, why don't you try dealing with what I actually write for a change....you know...instead of making extra shit up?! Where did I say that all critics "agreed" to inflate WW's ratings? ![](https://s26.postimg.org/gf93ycxax/giveup.gif) Critics watched WW and were probably delighted when they realized they wouldn't have to shit all over yet another DCU movie (bump). It's a blockbuster superhero movie led by a woman. Given the present climate, that's culturally significant (bump). Maybe they are predisposed to wanting to see a movie like this do well (bump).
|
|