|
|
Post by Snaggelpuss on Mar 26, 2017 3:42:43 GMT
I haven't seen too much trolling at superhero boards and popular franchise section. Do they have that crazy superhero who has 3 split personalities, who talks to itself, keeps tricking and murdering people, including the whole world, actual cannibalism of itself by its followers, dead and alive jew who will punish you with eternal torture if you dont have a stupid baseless belief, thats the greatest troll of all times. Actually sounds like the most evil anti hero ever.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2017 10:29:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by inthepipe55 on Mar 27, 2017 11:13:42 GMT
I hated when the super heroes and super hero power snuck onto to INTK on IMDb
|
|
|
|
Post by klandersen on Mar 27, 2017 14:42:34 GMT
I think they very very rarely intervened. Some of the older users from when it began claim initially they probably did, but the down side to having such a huge number of users its almost impossible to police. I think they had so few moderators that it seemed like they didn't have any. It brings to question just how many moderators does it take to maintain an orderly forum? How many moderators per hundred users are needed? Per 1,000 users?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2017 15:03:57 GMT
There are two sides to that coin. The correct minimum amount of moderators is only meaningful in relation to how well the users get along with one another. In a perfect world there would be no mods, but we all know online behavior is less than perfect. Anonymity tends to tempt people into behaving in ways they would less likely do in real life.
Part of being a good user is knowing what trolling or abuse actually is (by actually bothering to spend time reading the terms and conditions that you agreed to by registering), preventing your posting from straying into that area and knowing what is and isn't worth reporting. Mods sometimes are forced to waste time on frivolous reports when they could be dealing with real concerns elsewhere. It depends on two things: The quality of the mods and behavior of the users, so the answer is really relative. As in real life, policing levels reflect levels of actual crime. On a site riddled with trolls, a higher number of mods are needed, on a site with no trolling, the number might be zero.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cooper, the Golden Retriever on Mar 27, 2017 15:06:38 GMT
Nice and funny trolls are okay.. but the unfunny ones who harass people are not. Very well said.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ad○rably Obn○xi○us🐢 on Mar 28, 2017 19:06:43 GMT
I'm glad to see that. This site is a lot better mods than IMDB. I don't think that site had any mods. I incurred the wrath of one mod named Rachel over there when I disputed a two minute PQ raise just for asking a question on a thread where a fight broke out on the Help Board. Everyone involved with that thread, even the ones who weren't directly involved in the fight, were punished. When 'Rachel' got back to me she gave the usual IMDb shpiel about how IMDb doesn't disclose the details of its policies, etc, and admonished me to make sure I followed T&C in the future.  So I decided I'd really do something that broke T&C-I C&P'd all of our correspondence into my profile and went off. I didn't even advertise that I'd done it but she obviously saw what I did and reacted accordingly...slapping me with a 10 minute PQ, the vindictive bitch. It took years for my PQ to get back down to a minute, lol. It really was unfair but whatcha gonna do?? I wonder if she lost her job or just got absorbed into the company after IMDb closed its MB doors...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2017 21:07:15 GMT
Good. The trolls were the worst part of IMDb.
|
|
|
|
Post by mslo79 on Jun 30, 2017 8:46:16 GMT
Good. anyone who acts up beyond a certain point deserves to get penalized.
as a general rule... i prefer forums to be more lax than too strict but at the same time i don't want the place flooded with any obvious trolls/spam either. that's where IMDb slipped up as while it was lax, it was too lax, as it never really had any legitimate moderation of the obvious junk.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2017 19:11:24 GMT
I haven't seen too much trolling at superhero boards and popular franchise section. Isn't that meant to be a good thing Swiggity Swooty?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2017 20:23:31 GMT
I think they very very rarely intervened. Some of the older users from when it began claim initially they probably did, but the down side to having such a huge number of users its almost impossible to police. I think they had so few moderators that it seemed like they didn't have any. It brings to question just how many moderators does it take to maintain an orderly forum? How many moderators per hundred users are needed? Per 1,000 users? I think where IMDb's administration slipped up was in the creation of a board for every single thing, ever. If it became too much to handle, they should have just cut the boards for individual actors, films, filmmakers, and such, and just left the main boards like the ones we have on here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ecstasy on Jul 4, 2017 22:12:49 GMT
I haven't seen too much trolling at superhero boards and popular franchise section. Isn't that meant to be a good thing Swiggity Swooty? Didn't say it wasn't.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2017 6:12:07 GMT
And that is one of the things I like about this forum. There were WAY too many sexist, homophobic and racist trolls ruining boards for everybody and the superhero movie boards were overran by extreme Marvel and DC fans who literally spent 24/7 having fights with each other and it was really pathetic. If the IMDB board had an Admin or moderators it would still be around today but they let too many cyberbullies and trolls overtake the site. 
|
|