|
Post by clusium on Mar 28, 2018 12:59:45 GMT
It is, when the other 50% are made of several different groups of people, including soldiers (on all sides). except they dont. You just pulled that out of your arse. No I didn't, you moron. It's truth. The majority of the victims of the Nazis were Jewish, with 6,000,000 murder victims. The other 6,000,000 were made up different groups of people.
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by Lugh on Mar 28, 2018 13:35:47 GMT
except they dont. You just pulled that out of your arse. No I didn't, you moron. It's truth. The majority of the victims of the Nazis were Jewish, with 6,000,000 murder victims. The other 6,000,000 were made up different groups of people. Do you not know what the word majority means? Also you can be both a Jew and a Slav. Many Ashkenazi Jews are Slavic
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Mar 28, 2018 14:05:24 GMT
Do you not know what the word majority means? You apparently don't. When you have a set of people belonging to different groups, the group with the largest number of people has the majority. If it's less than 50% it's a relative majority; if it's more than 50% it's an absolute majority. That's why in parliament, when there's a vote, and 40% vote yes, 25% vote no and 35% abstain, the motion is passed, even if less than 50% voted yes.
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by Lugh on Mar 28, 2018 14:36:23 GMT
Do you not know what the word majority means? You apparently don't. When you have a set of people belonging to different groups, the group with the largest number of people has the majority. If it's less than 50% it's a relative majority; if it's more than 50% it's an absolute majority. That's why in parliament, when there's a vote, and 40% vote yes, 25% vote no and 35% abstain, the motion is passed, even if less than 50% voted yes. www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/majority
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Mar 28, 2018 14:52:35 GMT
No I didn't, you moron. It's truth. The majority of the victims of the Nazis were Jewish, with 6,000,000 murder victims. The other 6,000,000 were made up different groups of people. Do you not know what the word majority means? Also you can be both a Jew and a Slav. Many Ashkenazi Jews are Slavic Naw!!!!! Really?!?!?!
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by Lugh on Mar 28, 2018 16:20:51 GMT
Do you not know what the word majority means? Also you can be both a Jew and a Slav. Many Ashkenazi Jews are Slavic Naw!!!!! Really?!?!?! So how does the supposed data you have provided prove anything you said?
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Mar 28, 2018 16:28:52 GMT
So how does the supposed data you have provided prove anything you said? Because the #1 victims of the Nazis were Jewish. Hitler hated Jewish people with a passion, & wanted to eradicate them off the face of the planet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2018 16:33:13 GMT
Israel is an island of civilization in a sea of barbarism.
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by Lugh on Mar 28, 2018 17:23:32 GMT
So how does the supposed data you have provided prove anything you said? Because the #1 victims of the Nazis were Jewish. Hitler hated Jewish people with a passion, & wanted to eradicate them off the face of the planet. So you keep saying but without providing evidence.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Mar 28, 2018 17:27:42 GMT
You apparently don't. When you have a set of people belonging to different groups, the group with the largest number of people has the majority. If it's less than 50% it's a relative majority; if it's more than 50% it's an absolute majority. That's why in parliament, when there's a vote, and 40% vote yes, 25% vote no and 35% abstain, the motion is passed, even if less than 50% voted yes. www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/majority3c. Thanks for proving my point.
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by Lugh on Mar 28, 2018 17:28:51 GMT
3c. Thanks for proving my point. can you quote where it proves your point?
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Mar 28, 2018 18:09:10 GMT
3c. Thanks for proving my point. can you quote where it proves your point? Yes.
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by Lugh on Mar 28, 2018 18:11:12 GMT
can you quote where it proves your point? Yes. den do it, smart arse.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Mar 28, 2018 18:45:10 GMT
"The greater quantity or share"
When you have 40%, 30%, 20% and 10%, 40% is the greatest quantity or share. Meaning: A greater quantity or share than any other quantity or share. Or in this case: When you have 17 million people, and one group of people is 6 million, and the next biggest group of people is 3 million, then six million is the biggest quantity, aka the majority (in the sense quoted above).
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by Lugh on Mar 28, 2018 18:49:57 GMT
"The greater quantity or share" When you have 40%, 30%, 20% and 10%, 40% is the greatest quantity or share. Meaning: A greater quantity or share than any other quantity or share. Or in this case: When you have 17 million people, and one group of people is 6 million, and the next biggest group of people is 3 million, then six million is the biggest quantity, aka the majority (in the sense quoted above). oh yeah I missed that part. Either way more Slavs then Jews were killed in the Holocaust.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Mar 28, 2018 19:46:09 GMT
"The greater quantity or share" When you have 40%, 30%, 20% and 10%, 40% is the greatest quantity or share. Meaning: A greater quantity or share than any other quantity or share. Or in this case: When you have 17 million people, and one group of people is 6 million, and the next biggest group of people is 3 million, then six million is the biggest quantity, aka the majority (in the sense quoted above). oh yeah I missed that part. Either way more Slavs then Jews were killed in the Holocaust. And more Germans died in World War II than French, Brits or US-Americans put together. So what? Does this give Germans the right to play the victim card? No it doesn't. But when a group of people goes from 17 million to 11 million in a few years, and this because of systematic destruction, this group has every right to play the victim card.
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by Lugh on Mar 28, 2018 19:49:08 GMT
oh yeah I missed that part. Either way more Slavs then Jews were killed in the Holocaust. And more Germans died in World War II than French, Brits or US-Americans put together. So what? Does this give Germans the right to play the victim card? No it doesn't. But when a group of people goes from 17 million to 11 million in a few years, and this because of systematic destruction, this group has every right to play the victim card. Did Slavs do something wrong? Were Slavs not victims of the Holocaust? I never said Jews dont have the right to play the victim card, just that they and others are overplaying it. Well I would agree that Germany was a victim of World War 2. Germany was poorly treated after WW2, just like after WW1 but for some reason nobody ever talks about that.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Mar 28, 2018 20:07:37 GMT
I never said Jews dont have the right to play the victim card, just that they and others are overplaying it. I wouldn't know about that. After all, the Holocaust was just the climax of a century-old percecution of Jews that had been going on since Christians became powerful. To paraphrase Christian theologist Hans Küng: "The Holocaust would not have been possible without the century-long antisemitism of the Churches". Well I would agree that Germany was a victim of World War 2. Germany was poorly treated after WW2, just like after WW1 but for some reason nobody ever talks about that. Not at all. Western Germany was treated well after World War II. Marshall Plan, Berliner Luftbrücke, which lead to the Wirtschaftswunder... Eastern Germany however was raped by Stalinist Soviet Union. No wonder a large majority of people chose to join Western Germany in 1990, instead of working on a new constitution. But it's true that Germany was treated badly after World War I. In fact, I believe that the Nazis would not have come to power if it hadn't been for the Versailles treaty. But the allies learned from that mistake after World War II.
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
![](http://storage.proboards.com/6692551/images/CTEdkGf0wmfSETIzYiXk.gif)
|
Post by Lugh on Mar 28, 2018 20:23:17 GMT
I never said Jews dont have the right to play the victim card, just that they and others are overplaying it. I wouldn't know about that. After all, the Holocaust was just the climax of a century-old percecution of Jews that had been going on since Christians became powerful. To paraphrase Christian theologist Hans Küng: "The Holocaust would not have been possible without the century-long antisemitism of the Churches". Well I would agree that Germany was a victim of World War 2. Germany was poorly treated after WW2, just like after WW1 but for some reason nobody ever talks about that. Not at all. Western Germany was treated well after World War II. Marshall Plan, Berliner Luftbrücke, which lead to the Wirtschaftswunder... Eastern Germany however was raped by Stalinist Soviet Union. No wonder a large majority of people chose to join Western Germany in 1990, instead of working on a new constitution. But it's true that Germany was treated badly after World War I. In fact, I believe that the Nazis would not have come to power if it hadn't been for the Versailles treaty. But the allies learned from that mistake after World War II. American policy in Germany following WW2 was purely cynical. Germany was carved up with a knife and distributed to various European nations as victory prizes.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Mar 28, 2018 20:55:47 GMT
HG Wells was an atheist and he was very critical of Orthodox Judaism. In fact, he said Christianity clearly had nothing to do with anti-Jewish antagonism since many pagan societies also were anti-Jewish.
Read his essay in the Fate of Homo Sapiens on the dangers of ethnic nationalism (he was a supporter of globalism in a sense however he regarded Judaism has the worst kind of ethnocentric supremacy myth).
It was interesting when Trump got into office and there were reports of Jewish cemetery vandalism he made a comment that they were probably self-inflicted and it turned out to be correct.
I remember reading in a 1960s Collier's encyclopedia that one of the things that made Germans anti-jewish was their revulsion about kosher slaughter. To this day, who doesn't regard kosher and halal slaughter as cruel and disgusting? It definitely should be banned along with factory farming. Anyone who disagrees is a superstitious barbarian.
The thing about Germany is that the story we were peddled in school was that the National Socialists came to power because a)Hitler was a madman and b) Germans were brainwashed/full of hate. We were shown Triumph of the Will to reinforce this idea---but the existence of the Goebbels' produced Munchhausen film proves that there was some fudging of the facts.
The question is, what the hell was happening in Wiemar Germany that got the people so pissed off they would vote NS in the first place? What was going on with the economy? The media etc? The fact that Trump was compared to Hitler for wanting to bring jobs back to Middle America and his supporters were called racists is quite troubling because it makes one wonder if the official story on WW 2 is biased.
I have asked it before-why were the Jewish-owned movie studios--that did a film on the Rothschilds in the mid 30s and did a film about antisemitism in the late 40s (won a best picture Oscar) why didn't they do movies on the 6 million after 1945? No one can answer this.
"6 million" didn't get discussed until the mid 70s.
And on the other side it turns out that the authority on the Soviet Union, Alexander Solschenitsyn, said that the revolution was a mainly Jewish enterprise. Petr Stolypin was assassinated by a Jewish gunman.
This was not talked about in Western media. I remember in FIREFOX, Clint Eastwood says to a Russian "what is it with you Jews anyway? Don't you ever get tired of fighting city hall?" Very disingenuous given the Bolsheviks' background. Even Lenin it turned out had Jewish ancestry. I read Stalin ordered the destruction of the largest church in Moscow but not the synagogue.
I think though that ultimately it is just a biological phenomenon that gets played out over and over again--but given the globalist role in the EU(SSR) and global finance, it has reached a crisis point in the West. Who knows where it will lead. The internet ripped the veil off the mainstream media control so people are speaking freely.
Mark Twain was no rightwing fanatic, and he wrote an essay "Concerning the Jews' for Harper's Magazine in 1898. Well worth checking out.
|
|