kanekikun
Sophomore
@kanekikun
Posts: 236
Likes: 18
|
Post by kanekikun on Aug 22, 2018 13:15:07 GMT
But then that would have required them to have a trilogy plan that they'd thought out in advance and were willing to stick to no matter what an individual director wanted. Like Marvel does. But the Star Wars head honcho doesn't seem to care for that approach. as always, marvelously thought through:
Like with Thor where each movie contradicted the other, not to forget Thor:Fragglerock following Guardians where Thor suddenly becomes a hipster comedien and cry-baby when getting a hair cut, Loki becomes a bumbling sidekick; and where set ups, characters and and themes are dropped such as the Jane romance, Earth, Lokis take over etc?
Like with Cap3 where the last film is about Avengers Civil war, IM's mommy issues and Spider & Panther origins and the Hydra story is completely dropped neve rto be seen again?
Like in IronMan where the mang goes through his jerk-arc several times only to blow up the suits, but to immediately be at it again in the next one?
you keep tinking that movies cant expand and be more than just the 1 story. thats sad.
cap isnt about hydra, thor isnt about jane and earth and stuff.
same, star wars isnt all about the skywalkers. shouldnt be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2018 14:50:19 GMT
Ooo, hit a nerve there, huh?
Like it or not, Marvel's movies are thought out in advance. And if a director doesn't like it, tough.
Not so with Star Wars.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Aug 22, 2018 14:57:24 GMT
Too bad we just had this same conversation over at Raptor's board where you said the literal exact same thing, Sam. ETA: Whoops. a lot of peopel think sequls this late was a bad idea. i cantb e the only one person here who tinks so. Actually, you are. This is... getting pretty cringe, bud.
|
|
kanekikun
Sophomore
@kanekikun
Posts: 236
Likes: 18
|
Post by kanekikun on Aug 22, 2018 15:49:20 GMT
a lot of peopel think sequls this late was a bad idea. i cantb e the only one person here who tinks so. Actually, you are. This is... getting pretty cringe, bud. nah, lots of peopel thinks dusney making sequels now was a bad idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2018 16:02:42 GMT
Ooo, hit a nerve there, huh? Like it or not, Marvel's movies are thought out in advance. And if a director doesn't like it, tough. Not so with Star Wars. If you actually think Tristan or colden are here to defend the shit-filled-dumpster-fire known as Disney Star Wars, then you're even a bigger moron than I thought.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2018 16:04:17 GMT
Ooo, hit a nerve there, huh? Like it or not, Marvel's movies are thought out in advance. And if a director doesn't like it, tough. Not so with Star Wars. If you actually think Tristan or colden are here to defend the shit-filled-dumpster-fire known as Disney Star Wars, then you're even a bigger moron than I thought. Good thing I didn't say that, then. I dodged a bullet there.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Aug 22, 2018 19:16:58 GMT
as always, marvelously thought through:
Like with Thor where each movie contradicted the other, not to forget Thor:Fragglerock following Guardians where Thor suddenly becomes a hipster comedien and cry-baby when getting a hair cut, Loki becomes a bumbling sidekick; and where set ups, characters and and themes are dropped such as the Jane romance, Earth, Lokis take over etc?
Like with Cap3 where the last film is about Avengers Civil war, IM's mommy issues and Spider & Panther origins and the Hydra story is completely dropped neve rto be seen again?
Like in IronMan where the mang goes through his jerk-arc several times only to blow up the suits, but to immediately be at it again in the next one?
you keep tinking that movies cant expand and be more than just the 1 story. thats sad.
cap isnt about hydra, thor isnt about jane and earth and stuff.
same, star wars isnt all about the skywalkers. shouldnt be.
Actually, you bobblehead doxxing twice-banned little creep, "Star Wars" is a six-film saga about a guy named Anakin Skywalker created by George Lucas between 1977 and 2005, with a supplementary cartoon series about the same character running from ~2008-2012. The Disney garbage is all fanfiction by virtue of its very existence. For someone who spends his entire workday bloviating about this shit instead of whatever your actual job is, you sure don't know jack shit.
|
|
kanekikun
Sophomore
@kanekikun
Posts: 236
Likes: 18
|
Post by kanekikun on Aug 22, 2018 19:18:54 GMT
you keep tinking that movies cant expand and be more than just the 1 story. thats sad.
cap isnt about hydra, thor isnt about jane and earth and stuff.
same, star wars isnt all about the skywalkers. shouldnt be.
Actually, you bobblehead doxxing twice-banned little creep, "Star Wars" is a six-film saga about a guy named Anakin Skywalker created by George Lucas between 1977 and 2005, with a supplementary cartoon series about the same character running from ~2008-2012. The Disney garbage is all fanfiction by virtue of its very existence. For someone who spends his entire workday bloviating about this shit instead of whatever your actual job is, you sure don't know jack shit. star wars can be a real universe insead of jus being abiout one guy or one family. saying it has to bee that way is a waste of a good universe. luxcas was bad at thinking abut the big picture.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2018 19:15:05 GMT
If you actually think Tristan or colden are here to defend the shit-filled-dumpster-fire known as Disney Star Wars, then you're even a bigger moron than I thought. Good thing I didn't say that, then. I dodged a bullet there. Of course you said that. Otherwise you wouldn't have implied you hit a nerve when you said it. You out-witted yourself, dummy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2018 19:35:09 GMT
Good thing I didn't say that, then. I dodged a bullet there. Of course you said that. Otherwise you wouldn't have implied you hit a nerve when you said it. You out-witted yourself, dummy. Lol, invented implications to justify invented quotes. How wonderful.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2018 19:37:39 GMT
Of course you said that. Otherwise you wouldn't have implied you hit a nerve when you said it. You out-witted yourself, dummy. Lol, invented implications to justify invented quotes. How wonderful. "invented quotes?" Ooo, hit a nerve there, huh?
You didn't say that, "huh?"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2018 20:02:35 GMT
Lol, invented implications to justify invented quotes. How wonderful. "invented quotes?" Ooo, hit a nerve there, huh?
You didn't say that, "huh?" Oh, I see. Sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying; my apologies. But no, saying I hit a nerve didn't imply that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2018 20:12:40 GMT
"invented quotes?" Ooo, hit a nerve there, huh?
You didn't say that, "huh?" Oh, I see. Sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying; my apologies. But no, saying I hit a nerve didn't imply that. You mean how you hitting that nerve was in relation to what Disney had done to Star Wars? Yes, you were indeed implying that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2018 20:15:04 GMT
Oh, I see. Sorry, I misunderstood what you were saying; my apologies. But no, saying I hit a nerve didn't imply that. You mean how you hitting that nerve was in relation to what Disney had done to Star Wars? Yes, you were indeed implying that. Believe it, if you want to.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2018 20:16:23 GMT
You mean how you hitting that nerve was in relation to what Disney had done to Star Wars? Yes, you were indeed implying that. Believe it, if you want to. Deny it, if you must.
|
|