|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 22, 2018 15:28:57 GMT
I Oh dear ... are you running through my posting history again? ... replying to week old posts with insinuations of homosexuality? I think someone is about to come off the rails. SMH. Is this how you’re planning on having me “dealt with” ... for hurting your feelings? Stalking is not a good plan, sport. You’re going to make it difficult for Ghost Ackbar to maintain the facade that you're not just another angry spiteful troll. It seems to me that the last thing coldenhaufield wants is a troll free environment. It seems to me that you should at least pretend to discuss the MCU or something other than who is and who isn't a troll and should or should not be banned, Sammy.
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Apr 22, 2018 15:34:25 GMT
IIt seems to me that the last thing coldenhaufield wants is a troll free environment. It seems to me that you should at least pretend to discuss the MCU or something other than who is and who isn't a troll and should or should not be banned, Sammy. Your paranoia is amusing.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 22, 2018 15:35:13 GMT
It seems to me that you should at least pretend to discuss the MCU or something other than who is and who isn't a troll and should or should not be banned, Sammy. Your paranoia is amusing. Your antics are transparent.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Apr 22, 2018 16:51:48 GMT
Obvious sock account aside.
Yes DC Fan did insinuate that MCU fans were pedophiles. Yes that was trollish behaviour. Yes I did warn him about and edited his post to remove that. If there was another one then I didn't see it.
Does it justify doxxing in return? No.
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Apr 22, 2018 16:59:54 GMT
Obvious sock account aside. Yes DC Fan did insinuate that MCU fans were pedophiles. Yes that was trollish behaviour. Yes I did warn him about and edited his post to remove that. If there was another one then I didn't see it. Does it justify doxxing in return? No. I agree that the doxxing was unjustified. But how many warnings can one person receive before it is clear they are taking no notice of you whatsoever?
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Apr 22, 2018 17:10:50 GMT
I agree that the doxxing was unjustified. But how many warnings can one person receive before it is clear they are taking no notice of you whatsoever? Admittedly while I did warn him about the comment that I saw, I did not see the thread that was made around the same time. That was probably removed by another mod. I will try to make sure there is no such implication again.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Apr 22, 2018 17:26:12 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2018 17:58:03 GMT
And for the record, I have pretty much gotten along with everyone here on BOTH sides of this so called war. Yet everytime you post it seems you're arguing with someone. I don't want to be that. That's a waste of time and energy. Ironically enough my temporary banning was due a thread I made that was designed to mock the over the top hostility here. You neglected to answer my question. Again. Is that because you would have to acknowledge that coldenhaulfield is guilty of every thing I said, and I am not? It certainly looks like you’re trying to protect your buddy by willfully ignoring his offenses. I didn't know you got banned. Interesting. It falls right in line with the observation that you seem to have difficulty determining the difference between innocuous banter and behavior that is ban-worthy. Another case in point, the troll you keep defending, DC-Fraud, just admitted a few posts ago that the admins have been hard at work cleaning up after him, and have even had to issue him a warning to stop crapping on the lawn. That’s all well and good with you, but the guy with zero deletions and zero warning is the one you take aim at. Troll enabler is sounding pretty apt right about now, eh? Whatever, dude. Keep arguing with everyone on here all the time and being abrasive in every post. You're the one that's asking to be banned. Not me.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Apr 22, 2018 17:58:41 GMT
And I answered you. We were just talking about this in another thread an hour or two ago! No, I asked you to list things that MCU did better than other cbm studios. Not just something you liked about the MCU. What MCU does better than other CBM studios is MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews. It's similar to how Bill Belichick, besides being good at cheating, the next best thing Belichick does is know how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. That's why the Patriots get the most favorable calls from the refs. When Tom Brady fumbles away a playoff game in the snow, the refs say "No Fumble" even though that exact same play has been ruled a fumble EVERY time it's happened in the history of the game. When the Patriots grab a Falcons' player's facemask in the Super Bowl, the refs don't call the penalty and instead penalize the Falcons on the same play moving the Falcons out of FG range and costing the Falcons a chance to clinch the game. When the Steelers score a game-winning TD against the Patriots, the refs take the TD away for no reason at all. And then the very next week, when the Bills score a TD against the Patriots, the refs again take the TD away for no reason at all. Bill Belichick knows how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. Similarly, MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews even for many of the most crappy MCU movies.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Apr 22, 2018 18:58:40 GMT
You neglected to answer my question. Again. Is that because you would have to acknowledge that coldenhaulfield is guilty of every thing I said, and I am not? It certainly looks like you’re trying to protect your buddy by willfully ignoring his offenses. I didn't know you got banned. Interesting. It falls right in line with the observation that you seem to have difficulty determining the difference between innocuous banter and behavior that is ban-worthy. Another case in point, the troll you keep defending, DC-Fraud, just admitted a few posts ago that the admins have been hard at work cleaning up after him, and have even had to issue him a warning to stop crapping on the lawn. That’s all well and good with you, but the guy with zero deletions and zero warning is the one you take aim at. Troll enabler is sounding pretty apt right about now, eh? Whatever, dude. Keep arguing with everyone on here all the time and being abrasive in every post. You're the one that's asking to be banned. Not me. I only argue with the trolls ... that’s not everyone ... quite yet. ... and just out of curiosity, perhaps you can show me an instance where I was abrasive to an undeserved recipient. I’d like to know what sort of comments have your knickers in such a bunch. BTW, if you’re looking for an excellent example of trolling, DC-Fraud has come through again. See his post, right after yours. Great timing!
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Apr 22, 2018 19:09:49 GMT
Oh dear ... are you running through my posting history again? ... replying to week old posts with insinuations of homosexuality? I think someone is about to come off the rails. SMH. Is this how you’re planning on having me “dealt with” ... for hurting your feelings? Stalking is not a good plan, sport. You’re going to make it difficult for Ghost Ackbar to maintain the facade that you're not just another angry spiteful troll. It's not stalking to respond to what is one of the most active threads on the board. And I merely suggested you lighten up and not spoil every thread, formersamhmd style, with your weird obsession with DC-Fan . It's creepy, mang. As far as homosexuality: I didn't insinuate anything. I flat-out stated that if you weren't able to just kick back in the women's thread, you might prefer the men's. And guess what? That wasn't supposed to be an insult, and it would only have offended a homophobe or a bigot. It's 2018, and it's no longer some kind of disgusting insult or "fightin' words" to suggest someone love the gender and person of their choice. So... not sure what you're getting at with any of that, except to advise maybe talking about your feelings of confusion and anger with like a counselor? Or a family member you trust? I dunno, buddy. What are you babbling about now? In the past 24 hours you’ve hunted down a dozen of my posts in other topics and trolled them with pointless little butt-hurt remarks. Looks like the admins even had to censor you in one of them. You just can’t help yourself, can you, Ace.
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Apr 22, 2018 19:10:36 GMT
No, I asked you to list things that MCU did better than other cbm studios. Not just something you liked about the MCU. What MCU does better than other CBM studios is MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews. It's similar to how Bill Belichick, besides being good at cheating, the next best thing Belichick does is know how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. That's why the Patriots get the most favorable calls from the refs. When Tom Brady fumbles away a playoff game in the snow, the refs say "No Fumble" even though that exact same play has been ruled a fumble EVERY time it's happened in the history of the game. When the Patriots grab a Falcons' player's facemask in the Super Bowl, the refs don't call the penalty and instead penalize the Falcons on the same play moving the Falcons out of FG range and costing the Falcons a chance to clinch the game. When the Steelers score a game-winning TD against the Patriots, the refs take the TD away for no reason at all. And then the very next week, when the Bills score a TD against the Patriots, the refs again take the TD away for no reason at all. Bill Belichick knows how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. Similarly, MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews even for many of the most crappy MCU movies. is it true that you falsified text on a Wikipedia page in order to deceive users of this message board?
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Apr 22, 2018 19:10:39 GMT
No, I asked you to list things that MCU did better than other cbm studios. Not just something you liked about the MCU. What MCU does better than other CBM studios is MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews. It's similar to how Bill Belichick, besides being good at cheating, the next best thing Belichick does is know how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. That's why the Patriots get the most favorable calls from the refs. When Tom Brady fumbles away a playoff game in the snow, the refs say "No Fumble" even though that exact same play has been ruled a fumble EVERY time it's happened in the history of the game. When the Patriots grab a Falcons' player's facemask in the Super Bowl, the refs don't call the penalty and instead penalize the Falcons on the same play moving the Falcons out of FG range and costing the Falcons a chance to clinch the game. When the Steelers score a game-winning TD against the Patriots, the refs take the TD away for no reason at all. And then the very next week, when the Bills score a TD against the Patriots, the refs again take the TD away for no reason at all. Bill Belichick knows how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. Similarly, MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews even for many of the most crappy MCU movies. Seems DC needs to learn this "tactic". Git Gud!
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Apr 22, 2018 19:43:28 GMT
What MCU does better than other CBM studios is MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews. It's similar to how Bill Belichick, besides being good at cheating, the next best thing Belichick does is know how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. That's why the Patriots get the most favorable calls from the refs. When Tom Brady fumbles away a playoff game in the snow, the refs say "No Fumble" even though that exact same play has been ruled a fumble EVERY time it's happened in the history of the game. When the Patriots grab a Falcons' player's facemask in the Super Bowl, the refs don't call the penalty and instead penalize the Falcons on the same play moving the Falcons out of FG range and costing the Falcons a chance to clinch the game. When the Steelers score a game-winning TD against the Patriots, the refs take the TD away for no reason at all. And then the very next week, when the Bills score a TD against the Patriots, the refs again take the TD away for no reason at all. Bill Belichick knows how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. Similarly, MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews even for many of the most crappy MCU movies. is it true that you falsified text on a Wikipedia page in order to deceive users of this message board? No, not true.
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Apr 22, 2018 19:59:10 GMT
is it true that you falsified text on a Wikipedia page in order to deceive users of this message board? No, not true. So you are saying anyone who claims otherwise is a liar?
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 22, 2018 20:02:47 GMT
It's not stalking to respond to what is one of the most active threads on the board. And I merely suggested you lighten up and not spoil every thread, formersamhmd style, with your weird obsession with DC-Fan . It's creepy, mang. As far as homosexuality: I didn't insinuate anything. I flat-out stated that if you weren't able to just kick back in the women's thread, you might prefer the men's. And guess what? That wasn't supposed to be an insult, and it would only have offended a homophobe or a bigot. It's 2018, and it's no longer some kind of disgusting insult or "fightin' words" to suggest someone love the gender and person of their choice. So... not sure what you're getting at with any of that, except to advise maybe talking about your feelings of confusion and anger with like a counselor? Or a family member you trust? I dunno, buddy. What are you babbling about now? In the past 24 hours you’ve hunted down a dozen of my posts in other topics and trolled them with pointless little butt-hurt remarks. Looks like the admins even had to censor you in one of them. You just can’t help yourself, can you, Ace. Your paranoia appears to be verging on formersamhmd levels. Just don't start doxxing people or cheating to win football games and you'll be okay, though.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 22, 2018 20:04:09 GMT
What MCU does better than other CBM studios is MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews. It's similar to how Bill Belichick, besides being good at cheating, the next best thing Belichick does is know how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. That's why the Patriots get the most favorable calls from the refs. When Tom Brady fumbles away a playoff game in the snow, the refs say "No Fumble" even though that exact same play has been ruled a fumble EVERY time it's happened in the history of the game. When the Patriots grab a Falcons' player's facemask in the Super Bowl, the refs don't call the penalty and instead penalize the Falcons on the same play moving the Falcons out of FG range and costing the Falcons a chance to clinch the game. When the Steelers score a game-winning TD against the Patriots, the refs take the TD away for no reason at all. And then the very next week, when the Bills score a TD against the Patriots, the refs again take the TD away for no reason at all. Bill Belichick knows how to work the refs to get favorable calls for the Patriots. Similarly, MCU knows how to work the critics to get favorable reviews even for many of the most crappy MCU movies. is it true that you falsified text on a Wikipedia page in order to deceive users of this message board? Is it true that you're weirdraptor's sock? Or are you formersamhmd's?
|
|
|
Post by No Morpho, Only Bánh mì on Apr 22, 2018 20:12:26 GMT
is it true that you falsified text on a Wikipedia page in order to deceive users of this message board? Is it true that you're weirdraptor's sock? Or are you formersamhmd's? Whatever his former alias, one thing is certain- Stormin’ Norman is hot on a trivial mission.
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Apr 22, 2018 20:29:01 GMT
is it true that you falsified text on a Wikipedia page in order to deceive users of this message board? Is it true that you're weirdraptor's sock? Or are you formersamhmd's? No. We'd best not get into how many sock accounts you have. We would be here all night.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Apr 22, 2018 20:40:55 GMT
Is it true that you're weirdraptor's sock? Or are you formersamhmd's? No. We'd best not get into how many sock accounts you have. We would be here all night. So you don't even deny being a sock. Amazing. And just how many socks do I supposedly have?
|
|