|
|
Post by truecristian on Mar 14, 2017 19:21:39 GMT
This movie is another pinnacle of bad hollywood-productions. Its actually almost as bad as Armageddon. I give it 1 for decent fx, but thats it. Its basically the same old, worn out recipe, seen so many times before. Bad thing happens. Solve it. Bad thing happens again. Solve it. Everything goes wrong all the time and it has to be fixed in a matter of minutes. The story is lame. Their is no excitement because whatever happens the writer has the ability to create a superpower that will solve the problem. What really amazes me is that people actually vote this one better than the story of Dave Gale. Astounding. A disgusting piece of a craptacular movie. Dont go see it unless you have never seen this kind of movie before.All in all it's a movie we can bear with if it is not seen twice or more. This lame chapter features the drastic debut of Nightcrawler and the farthest final of Jean Grey so, Just See it for once.But the major problem in the movie was its plot, it got no strength, no intention, no drift it's Only got a great STORYBOARD. Producers plan was : Filling Weak plot adding essential cast from the original chapter, also by mixing new ones with the cut down of some previous mutants, then summing them with the trendy special FX.
|
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Mar 14, 2017 19:49:49 GMT
WTF did i just read?
|
|
|
|
Post by misternick on Mar 14, 2017 20:54:24 GMT
Troll smarter not harder!
|
|
|
|
Post by Commander_Jim on Mar 14, 2017 20:56:55 GMT
It's not as good as Ghostbusters (2016) that's for sure
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 20:57:47 GMT
Troll smarter not harder! Why is the OP a troll?
|
|
|
|
Post by truecristian on Mar 19, 2017 23:32:30 GMT
It's not as good as Ghostbusters (2016) that's for sure
|
|
|
|
Post by salomonj on Apr 19, 2017 16:24:15 GMT
lmao you really don't know shit
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Apr 19, 2017 16:24:52 GMT
uh.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 19, 2017 16:36:07 GMT
What's the story of David Gale?
|
|
|
|
Post by NewtJorden on Apr 19, 2017 16:43:23 GMT
Nice try OP
|
|
|
|
Post by Jerk on Apr 19, 2017 18:44:52 GMT
What's the story of David Gale? An Ok movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 19, 2017 19:37:07 GMT
Troll smarter not harder! Why is the OP a troll? Cheesy font. Bad grammar and sentence structure. Misspellings. Incoherent thoughts. All done intentionally just to annoy.
|
|
|
|
Post by maxwellperfect on Apr 19, 2017 19:39:10 GMT
Troll smarter not harder! Why is the OP a troll? Well, the poster does refer to two characters that don't actually appear in the movie, so either he/she is very confused, didn't watch the movie, or trolling, or some combination of those options.
|
|
|
|
Post by louise on Apr 19, 2017 21:13:36 GMT
i thought it was a horrible film, but my son liked it. He says teenagers like gratuitous violence.
|
|
|
|
Post by outrider127 on Apr 19, 2017 23:15:27 GMT
T his movie is another pinnacle of bad hollywood-productions. Its actually almost as bad as Armageddon. I give it 1 for decent fx, but thats it. Its basically the same old, worn out recipe, seen so many times before. Bad thing happens. Solve it. Bad thing happens again. Solve it. Everything goes wrong all the time and it has to be fixed in a matter of minutes. The story is lame. Their is no excitement because whatever happens the writer has the ability to create a superpower that will solve the problem. What really amazes me is that people actually vote this one better than the story of Dave Gale. Astounding. A disgusting piece of a craptacular movie. Dont go see it unless you have never seen this kind of movie before.All in all it's a movie we can bear with if it is not seen twice or more. This lame chapter features the drastic debut of Nightcrawler and the farthest final of Jean Grey so, Just See it for once.But the major problem in the movie was its plot, it got no strength, no intention, no drift it's Only got a great STORYBOARD. Producers plan was : Filling Weak plot adding essential cast from the original chapter, also by mixing new ones with the cut down of some previous mutants, then summing them with the trendy special FX.Did you write this in crayon?
|
|
|
|
Post by salomonj on Apr 20, 2017 0:19:39 GMT
i thought it was a horrible film, but my son liked it. He says teenagers like gratuitous violence. The violence wasn't that bad
|
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 20, 2017 12:53:12 GMT
Agreed. Gratuitous means without reason. But the violence had a reason and purpose behind it.
|
|
|
|
Post by deeznutz on Apr 20, 2017 16:17:36 GMT
Safe to say you won't be buying it then
|
|
|
|
Post by itsthatguyme on Apr 21, 2017 8:48:14 GMT
Why would you think this movie would be anything else?
|
|
|
|
Post by truecristian on Apr 23, 2017 7:28:16 GMT
Why would you think this movie would be anything else? The main villain's motivation is bland and stupid. (Yeah, he just wants to kill everyone and rule the world.) The way he "persuades" other mutants to join him is absolutely unbelievable - he basically just offers to increase a mutant's power and in return demands help to kill billions of people. Sounds like a fair deal. What's offputting is that the extent to which he augments his followers' powers is not constant. Like, Magneto gains the power to control pretty much all the metal on the planet at once, while Psylocke gains another special effect on her CGI laser beams or whatever it is that she emits. Apocalypse's abilities in general are largely undefined - at times he is shown pulling matter from objects around him to construct something, and then in the next shot he just makes solid objects like armor out of thin air. Another ridiculous thing was that they tried to make Isaac more intimidating by giving him thick soles so that he'd look taller, which is noticeable. What is more, his lines are cringe-worthy, but the problem is, so are everyone else's. Same boring cliché dialogues like "It's your home. We will help. Join us, Eric. I see good in you."
|
|