|
|
Post by damngumby on May 25, 2019 15:09:55 GMT
Oh dear. Alway Wrong thinks a 30% owner has no influence, but a 0% owner does. LOL!!! King Kong Shady actually thinks that advertisers have no influence over what a company does. King Kong Shady was wrong about Brady's cheating in DeflateGate and once again King Kong Shady is wrong about Disney not pressuring RT into censoring negative ratings of Captain Marvel. The Disney knucklehead who threatened to pull Disney's advertisement on RT if they didnt skew the RT scores ... thereby reducing the marketing exposure of a new release on the biggest movie website, must be the same moron who thought it was a good idea to spend more than they took in by buying seats to elevate the total gross. Prior to all that, he must have been one of those NFL officials who had to admit that he had no idea that temperature affects the pressure in a football, and then spent millions of dollars trying to hide that fact. Can such an idiot really exist in real life?
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 25, 2019 6:14:37 GMT
That kind of claim is less likely to work when you own 30% of the site, not to mention that Disney doesn't have any stakes there. The last time I checked, 30% is still a minority. It takes 50+% to have controlling interest in a company. And Disney doesn't need to have ownership of RT to influence. RT gets a big chunk of their revenue from advertisers. And Disney has more than enough money and power to influence advertisers. Oh dear. Alway Wrong thinks a 30% owner has no influence, but a 0% owner does. ... and a 30% owner has no more influence than a 0.0001% owner. Is there not a single subject that this guy can't screw up?
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 25, 2019 5:51:04 GMT
The only people who could possibly be upset that you have to verify that you saw a movie before scoring it, are the bitter fanboy trolls who abuse the system. (Thank you for outing yourselves, BTW.) It's so sad, I think I may actually shed a tear! ... oh, wait ... just a spec of dust. |
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 20, 2019 0:32:10 GMT
I dunno, has Power Ranger reached the stupidity level of DC-Fan, or is he still a troll light-weight?
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 19, 2019 17:26:33 GMT
You still haven’t rated Endgame yet. What do you give it out of ten? I thought it was 4 out of 10 originally. But after reflecting on the inconsistencies of the time travel of in the movie, the lazy and contrived writing and numerous plotholes in the movie, and the fact that Steve Rogers just let millions of people die while he was busy banging Peggy Carter, I have to lower the rating to 1 out of 10.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 19, 2019 16:37:17 GMT
So what? They brought Spider-Man, Doctor Strange, Black Panther, Bucky, and Falcon back from the dead. How many times have they brought Loki back from the dead? So why didn't they bring Coulson back from the dead for Endgame? DC-Fan fiction: Bring agent Coulson back from the dead to attend Tony Stark's funeral. Grade: F (not even troll worthy)
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 19, 2019 2:16:05 GMT
Apparently, someone never watched Star Trek: The Next Generation. Widely considered the best of all the ST series, it's pilot episode was awful, hell, the entire first season was awful, in fact. No, STTNG pilot and Season 1 wasn't great but it certainly wasn't awful. DC-Fan's credibility takes another hit! How is it possible to sink any lower?! ST:TNG worst season evah!
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 18, 2019 22:18:10 GMT
Yes, which means you can't tell whether the series itself is crappy because you haven't watched it. I watched the pilot episode and it was crappy. TV is a different medium than movies. A movie can start slowly but viewers will usually still stay to the end (unless it's really crappy) because they've already paid their money and it's only about 2 hours. A TV show can't start slowly because viewers will stop watching if it starts off crappy. So a TV show needs to start off strong. And even when deciding whether or not to pick up a TV show, network executives don't watch an entire season. They just watch the pilot episode and make their decision based on the pilot episode. So the pilot episode is what TV shows are judged by. And I watched the pilot episode of AoS and it was crappy. Apparently, someone never watched Star Trek: The Next Generation. Widely considered the best of all the ST series, it's pilot episode was awful, hell, the entire first season was awful, in fact. Just when you thought that DC-Fan's credibility couldn't drop any lower, he somehow manages to crater it even further. First, by letting it slip that he was judging an entire series on just the first episode ... and then by trying to claim that watching the first episode is all it takes to pass judgement on any TV series. Dumb & dumber.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 16, 2019 16:57:33 GMT
DC-Fan is truly blessed to have a board full of people willing to critique and provide feedback on his fan fiction. Rather lazy and contrived fan fiction. Imagine trying to portray Captain America as a tyrant and forgetting to account for the fact that he returned all the infinity stones. A tyrant would have kept them all and used them individually to impose his will upon others. I dont think we're going to be able to give DC-Fan any sort of passing grade for this awful fan fiction of his.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 15, 2019 22:45:40 GMT
Batman plotted to murder Superman
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 15, 2019 11:11:42 GMT
If Steve Rogers truly was a Power-Hungry Tyrant, why didn't he keep the Infinity Stones to himself? Boom! Checkmate! One simple question destroys all DC-Fan's work. LOL!
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 14, 2019 12:03:11 GMT
Looks like the OP troll is testing the mods again. How much of this spamming before it deserves a strike?
Perhaps they should create a recycle bin folder and automatically move his posts in it. It's the same failed shtick over and over and over and over ....
Makes sense to just dump it all into one place.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 13, 2019 22:04:16 GMT
Lazy viewing on your part. I'm glad they didn't find it necessary to cater to the lowest common denominator and spoon feed every moron in the audience. But that's just me. Considering the widespread acclaim and stellar box office, the number of people who have difficulty understanding these MCU superhero movies is a very small minority. Even on this board, there are only two individuals who get confused at every turn. Everyone else gets it. Not to fret! With the likes of Aquaman and Shazam, it looks like DC is moving in the direction of catering to these folks.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 13, 2019 9:50:06 GMT
Liar. Red Skull specifically mentions he can't possess the stone. And we only have Red Skull's word for that. So Cap claims that the UN can't be trusted to have oversight over the Avengers because the UN is corrupt and infiltrated by HYDRA (even though there was no evidence presented at all that anyone in the UN was corrupt or associated in any way with HYDRA), yet Cap is willing to trust the word of the former leader of HYDRA that he can't possess the Soul Stone and just hand over the powerful Soul Stone to the former leader of HYDRA?Like I said, the writing in MCU movies is just inconsistent and lazy and awful. It's a pretty safe bet that the entity formally known as Red Skull couldn't possess the stone ... because he didn't ... the entire time he was on Vormir. A "power-hungry tyrant" would have keep the stones for himself. Steve Rogers returned them all and settled for a quiet life. How many endless hours have you wasted trying to argue that Captain America was a power-hungry tyrant? ... only to be completely squashed by the events in End Game. Too funny! Do you ever tire of being wrong?
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 12, 2019 17:32:05 GMT
Did you know you can't blow up a shark by shooting a scuba tank?
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 11, 2019 21:42:41 GMT
Gamora simply killing herself would not have worked, because she would not have been sacrificing herself in pursuit of the stone. Gamoras intentons are irrelevant. Red skull says to Thanos, " you must lose that which you love" The criteria has to be met by the pursuer of the gem. The victim is most likely going to resist because they dont want to die, so in that interpretation doesnt matter if gamora kills herself, Thanos should still get the gem because hes lost what he loves If the stone had only required a death, then the rules would have stated death, not sacrifice. Sacrifice is all about intention. It is an offering to a higher power. In this case it is a life offered to the Soul Stone. Thanos would not have been deemed worthy to recieve the stone if he had simply sat on his hands and let Gamora kill herself out of spite. There would have been no act of an offering to the stone, either by Gamora or Thanos. If you were to present your argument to Red Skull, no doubt, he would laugh in your face ... as I am doing, right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 11, 2019 20:44:38 GMT
So ...
It looks like there is universal agreement that self-sacrifice would 100% satisfy the requiements of the stone. If either Hawkeye or Black Widow had killed themself so the other could obtain the stone, it would have worked ... since they both had a platonic type love for each other.
Gamora simply killing herself would not have worked, because she would not have been sacrificing herself in pursuit of the stone. It would have been the exact opposite, in fact.
In the Thanos & Gamora situation, Thanos's only remaining option was to sacrifice Gamora himself. The question becomes - If Thanos had the means to stop Gamora from killing herself (which he did), and he abstained, would doing nothing satisfy the sacrificial requirements of the stone? Can a non-act be considered an act of sacrifice? At best, this is a grey area. Most of these mythical type rules tend to be rather vague with plenty of wiggle room for reneging, if they are not followed to the letter. It is ridiculous to think that Thanos would have risked his destiny by letting Gamoa kill herself and then hope for a favorable ruling on the Vormir sacrifice. Thanos did the one sure-fire logical thing. He killed her himself, to avoid any possibility of failure.
There is no flaw, there is no lazy writting. It is all perfectly understandable. If you can't understand it, the problem lies with you, not the movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 11, 2019 16:35:45 GMT
Question for the mods.
Do you think the OP is legitimately as stupid as he appears, or is this just a troll thread, created by an individual who takes pleasure in this sort of thing?
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 9, 2019 11:40:59 GMT
DC-Fan rocks. He manages to live rent free in the heads of every mcu fan on this site. They constantly attack and insult him and it's like water off a ducks back. Never change DC-Fan Considering how much he gets owned, he's kinda like our pet.
|
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on May 9, 2019 11:24:04 GMT
There are several people over on the MCU board who claim that the woman isn't holding the hammer. It can clearly be seen that she has her hand around the hammer and there's nothing underneath the hammer and no strings holding up the hammer so how is it that anyone can claim the woman isn't holding the hammer? Are MCU fans just in denial similar to how Pats fans are still in denial about Shady Brady's cheating?  Hela is not holding up the hammer. If she drops her hand, it's obvious that the hammer would not fall to the ground, it would continue on it's horizontal path and smack her in the face. (Because - magic hammer. duh.) Hela is halting the forward motion of the hammer and she is about to crush it with one hand. She is not wielding it. Only a complete moron would try to claim that this is an image of Hela wielding Thor's hammer. What, is she pointing the handle at Thor as if it were the barrel of a gun? ... and any similarity to deflategate is that you are completely wrong on both accounts. So, in an unintended way, you got that right. 
|
|
