|
Post by damngumby on Feb 5, 2019 12:13:41 GMT
According to the results so far, no one really cares unless the Patriots are playing. Five times over the last decade! Wow. I remember people dismissing the Patriots as has-beens, never again to reclaim the glory of the early Belichick/Brady years. Doh! The scary thing - they ain't done yet! Favorite SB? 51, Obviously. The greatest comeback in Super Bowl history ... and the final nail in the GOAT argument.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 5, 2019 0:59:35 GMT
these Pats aren't much of a threat anymore. The only way Gronk gets another title is if he retires from the NFL and joins the WWE. LOL! ... this is fun!
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 5, 2019 0:54:55 GMT
Definitely the most boring SB ever. This wasn't a defensive battle. This was just a bad offense vs an inept offense. I guess you shouldn't have proclaimed the Rams offense, "unstoppable"! ![](https://s26.postimg.cc/tek3suwt5/laugh.gif)
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 5, 2019 0:50:52 GMT
I think that it is Wade Phillips. I want to see if He is capable of stopping Tom Brady and The Patriots again. I think the X-Factor is CJ Anderson. Anderson, who had a 48-yard game-winning TD run vs the Patriots in OT in 2015, was a late-season pickup by the Rams and has Super Bowl experience. 7 attempts, 22 yards, one fumble.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 4, 2019 23:51:10 GMT
It is not. It is a historic achievement!, on par with the '72 Dolphins undefeated season and Joe DiMaggios 56 game hitting streak! Straight from the horses mouth ... The difference is that those records don't have an * anywhere near them. Plus the Packers have won 13 NFL championships which means that the Cheatriots are still not as half as good as the Pack. As for SB "wins" ****** for the Cheaters, they are tied with the Steelers. So not bragging rights at all just yet. Are you still drunk?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 4, 2019 23:32:46 GMT
It is not. It is a historic achievement!, on par with the '72 Dolphins undefeated season and Joe DiMaggios 56 game hitting streak! Straight from the horses mouth ... On the contrary, the fact that no teams since the 1971 Cowboys and 1972 Dolphins have been able to win a Super Bowl the year after losing means that it's very uncommon and thus less likely that it will happen again. Well then, it will be even MORE impressive when it happens! That's like saying it'll be impressive when someone breaks Joe DiMaggio's 56-game hitting streak or it'll be impressive when another NFL team goes undefeated and wins the Super Bowl. Except that hasn't happened since DiMaggio had his 56-game hitting streak and since the 1972 Dolphins went undefeated. Some achievements are just rare and will never happen again.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 4, 2019 23:13:23 GMT
Which 1 of these 2 " SUPERBOWL" Games was Worse ? I dunno, watching Peyton Manning get absolutely shellacked was pretty entertaining! I can see why non-affiliated fans would view 53 as pretty dull. No fireworks.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 4, 2019 23:07:39 GMT
Hey ... does anyone know where I can find a seven finger avatar?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 4, 2019 13:37:09 GMT
What does everybody else think? Was this the season DC-Fan got caught altering his predictions, after the fact, so it wouldn't look like he was Always Wrong?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 4, 2019 3:56:52 GMT
This didnt age well...did it? Brought to you by Always Wrong!
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 4, 2019 3:27:21 GMT
not really any standout performances here just two shitty performances. Good defense. Particularly the Pats.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 4, 2019 3:13:06 GMT
I assume I won?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 3, 2019 17:02:38 GMT
The mighty Patriots, representing the most successful state in American sports.
Per capita.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 3, 2019 16:35:51 GMT
Just watched it. Very educational! Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 2, 2019 15:23:37 GMT
No, it was an incorrect call because the rule didn't apply on that play. NFL Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, Note 2. is in play every single time forward motion begins. The rule clearly states that the ball must be first tucked "into the body" before an incomplete pass can turn into a fumble. That is the one, and only, criteria that can lead to a fumble, according to the rule. If you need help with reading comprehension, maybe we can find you a tutor, cupcake.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 1, 2019 13:29:25 GMT
It will be there to sell toys, Im sure that's the prerogative. That's why the test audiences found it very memorable. The cat could be there to sell Cats. ![](http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Demeter+Cats+Cat+Reacts+School+Rock+Takes+UjK-CRPOiwll.jpg) That looks like Cheetah from the next Wonder Woman movie.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 1, 2019 12:43:33 GMT
Blazing Saddles The Cowboys Tombstone Silverado Little Big Man
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 1, 2019 6:29:03 GMT
Brady made a throwing motion and then stopped. The ball was knocked out of Brady's hands after his throwing motion had stopped so that was a fumble and a blown call by Walt Coleman. Ball don't lie ... and DC-Fan does. The rule clearly states that once forward motion begins, it is considered a foward pass and loss of possesion is an incomplete pass. The only mention of a fumble occuring is after the ball has been tucked into his body. Which clearly never happened.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 1, 2019 0:51:51 GMT
Always Wrong, at it again .... The poor guy still doesn't understand the tuck rule. ![](https://s26.postimg.cc/tek3suwt5/laugh.gif)
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jan 31, 2019 13:31:33 GMT
It didn't seem intentional like the phantom Roughing the Passer penalty against the Chiefs that gave the Patriots 15 yards and an automatic 1st down. In the Rams case, the refs didn't see the PI so they didn't throw the flag. In the Patriots case, the refs also didn't see the defender hit Brady on the head (because the defender hit Brady on the shoulder and didn't hit Brady on the head) so the refs shouldn't call a penalty for something they didn't actually see. But the refs did somehow called a penalty on the Chiefs for something they didn't actually see, which suggests that the refs were intentionally favoring Brady. Quit yer whinnin'. It was only 2nd down. The Patriots were a 3rd down conversion machine at that point. Unstoppable.
|
|