|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 24, 2019 15:28:42 GMT
When the games matter, Brady will take the big hits. No, Brady doesn't want to take the big hits anymore. It's 1 thing to take the big hits when he was in his 20s, but now that he's in his 40s, Brady clearly doesn't want to take the big hits anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 24, 2019 15:26:36 GMT
Shady Brady was just upset because his own stat-line was shit. As Brady proved when he had Garoppolo traded away to keep his own job safe, he puts himself before the team every time. It's hard for Brady to be pleased in a press conference when he had to rely on his WR to throw a TD pass because he couldn't do it himself. How'd I do, DC-Fan ? Brady usually sends out his ugly wife Giselle to publicly berate his teammates, like she did after the Super Bowl XLVI loss to the Giants in which Brady missed wide-open receivers multiple times. But Giselle must've been busy. Giselle is really ugly for a supermodel. Her nose looks like a giraffe's nose. But some people just have lower standards. Prince Rainier had high standards and married Grace Kelly while Prince Charles had lower standards and married Camilla. Joe DiaMaggio had high standards and married Marilyn Monroe, Justin Verlander had higher standards and married a real supermodel Kate Upton, while Brady had lower standards and married ugly Giselle.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 24, 2019 15:18:38 GMT
Brady can barely hit a deep ball now, let alone years after retirement. Brady has never been a deep thrower. The Pats system is throwing 2 yard passes and hoping the receivers can get past a defender for more yards.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 24, 2019 15:16:08 GMT
How the fuck are the Russos visionary? They've directed crappy movies that have contrived writing and huge plotholes. yeah how did they suddenly get the avengers gig? Because the Avengers movies are crappy movies and serious Directors like Martin Scorsese didn't want to direct crap like the Avengers movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 24, 2019 2:24:23 GMT
Let's try to predict the top 10 NFL coaches for the century team. For me, in no order: Bill Bellichick Don Shula Paul Brown Vince Lombardi Chuck Knoll Bill Walsh Tom Landry George Halas Bill Parcells Curly Lambeau(incidentally, he died on the day I was born) Don Shula Paul Brown Vince Lombardi Bill Walsh Tom Landry George Halas Those are my top 7. I would include Joe Gibbs in my top 10. 3 Super Bowl wins with 3 different QBs.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 24, 2019 2:20:52 GMT
Crossbones blew up a bunch of civilians. Wanda tried and failed to mitigate the explosion. Crossbones set off the bomb only because he was surrounded by the Avengers and forced to resort to desperate measures. If the Avengers wanted to mitigate the explosion, then they shouldn't have been so reckless to chase Crossbones through a crowded market during the day and force Crossbones to set off a bomb in a busy market. The FBI knew John Dillinger was in that movie theater in Chicago. If the FBI had been reckless like the Avengers and just rushed in with guns blazing, many innocent people could've been killed. The FBI did the right thing and waited for the show to end and people to leave the theater and then surrounded Dillinger after he came out of the theater. The Avengers should've waited until Crossbones wasn't in such a heavy populated area before they moved in. But the Avengers, under Cap's orders, acted recklessly and that's why many innocent people were killed. And that's why oversight of the Avengers was needed. But Cap is so power-hungry that he wanted the Avengers to have unlimited and unchecked authority to do whatever they wanted whenever they wanted so Cap refused to agree to oversight for his team and claimed "The safest hands are our own", which was clearly BULLSHIT since the Avengers' reckless actions, under Cap's orders, just got many innocent people killed and proved that the safest hands are not theirs and that oversight was clearly needed.
When cops act recklessly and innocent people get killed, they're held accountable and procedures are usually enacted to have oversight so it doesn't happen again. But Cap is a tyrant who believes that since the Avengers have the Might, they're Right and should have unlimited and unchecked authority to do whatever they want whenever they want.Ross wanted to use Banner as a weapon. He wasn't going to let the government use him as one. That's one of the reasons why he was finding a cure. And that's no excuse for Banner selfishly going to the university during the day when many civilians are around and putting those many civilians' lives at risk when he could've gont toe the university at night when there were fewer civilians around or even safer just sent Betty Ross to the university to get the data/information he needed. Betty being at the university doesn't out any civilian lives at risk like Banner being at the university does. But Banner was a selfish asshole and put his own agenda ahead of innocent lives, just like many of MCU's other so-called "heroes" often do. He didn't want the Avengers to be the governments personal hit squad that tell them where to go and when. And yet, Rogers wanted to join the US Army and accept a paycheck from the same US government that he doesn't want to take orders from. did the Justice League get permission to go into Russia before stopping Steppenwulf? Did the Justice League recklessly blow up many innocent civilians? Black Widow and Tony Stark both went to hearings. Black Widow went to the hearing just to tell Congress that they can't arrest her because she's an Avenger and the Avengers are more powerful than the government. Basically, Might makes Right, that's the philosophy of the Avengers. They call themselves "Earth's mightiest heroes" and they believe that their Might makes them Right so they can do whatever they want whenever they want without any restrictions or oversight and without being held accountable to the people for their actions. And Stark walked out on a Congressional hearing, after Congress requested that Stark, whose company allowed terrorists to get hold of weapons of mass destruction built by Stark Industries and used to kill US soldiers, turn over the Iron Man suit to the US government to prevent the Iron Man suit from getting into the hands of terrorists the same way that Stark Industries' other weapons of mass destruction got into the hands of terrorists.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 23, 2019 21:43:45 GMT
Superman is the very definition of might makes right. He's like a one man nuclear deterrent. Actually, Superman proves the opposite, which is what makes Superman a true superhero and MCU Captain America not a hero at all. Yes, Superman is the most powerful person on the planet. And as the most powerful person on the planet, he could easily rule over the planet and choose to do whatever he wanted whenever he wanted without answering to anyone. But as powerful as Superman is, he chooses to surrender himself to the US Army and let them handcuff him and he voluntarily appears before a Congressional committee even though they had no power to force him to. Because Superman respects the authority of the people and Superman believes that no matter how powerful a superhero may be, they still need to answer to the people. By contrast, Captain America believes that his Might gives him the Right to do whatever he wants whenever he wants without answering to anyone and Captain America doesn't respect the authority of the people, which is why he A) refuses to sign the Accords which would allow the people to have more oversight of the Avengers after a team of Avengers, led by Captain AMerica himself, reckless caused the deaths of many civilians and B) refuses to bring Bucky in for a trial because he doesn't believe in the justice system that the people set up and doesn't believe in the people to make the right and just verdict. In the miniseries John Adams, when Abigail Adams was told that George Washington would not seek reelection after his 2nd term and would step down as POTUS, she was shocked and said "He could be President for life." Back then, there was nothing in the US Constitution that limited POTUS to 2 terms and there was no precedent nor expectation for a POTUS to step down after 2 terms and hand over power to the next POTUS. Washington could've been POTUS for life but chose to not be like a King. Superman could easily rule the planet but he chooses not to rule the planet and instead chooses to respect the authority of the people and answer to the people. That's why Superman is and always will be the greatest superhero of all while Captain America isn't a real superhero but just a selfish asshole who wants to be a tyrant.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 23, 2019 20:17:39 GMT
The most legitimate complaint against MCU is that MCU movies is that MCU Dictator Kevin Feige just has no clue about what being a true superhero is about. Because as I've proven many times, MCU's so-called "heroes" aren't true superheroes but just a bunch of selfish assholes who always put their own agenda ahead of innocent people's lives and who always think that they don't have to answer to the people or be held accountable for their actions because they believe in the paradigm that " Might Makes Right" and since they consider themselves "Earth's mightiest heroes", that gives them the Right to do whatever they want whenever they want without any restrictions or oversight and without having to answer to anyone or be held accountable. Unless they're agents of the law, they're all vigilantes. As films and comics try to get more gritty, they leave behind the notion these characters were meant to be simple avatars for good and evil. I don't see how your argument doesn't apply to all superheroes.
My point is about MCU's so-called "heroes" being selfish assholes who put their own agenda ahead of innocent lives (for example, Bruce Banner going to the university during the day when there were plenty of civilians around and then refusing to surrender peacefully before he turned into Hulk and put many civilian lives at risk) and who think that they don't have to answer to anyone (for example, Steve Rogers thinking that the Avengers, under his command, can just blow up a bunch of civilians while chasing Crossbones and not have to be held or agree to oversight for his team). That doesn't apply to all superheroes. For example, unlike Banner (who put his own agenda of not getting captured ahead of the lives of many civilians), Superman was willing to surrender himself to the custody of the US Army, knowing that they would in turn surrender him over to Zod, to prevent Zod from carrying out his threat to punish the people of Earth if they didn't hand over Kal-El. Moreover, Superman was willing to appear before a Congressional committee when summoned to even though they didn't have the power to make him appear because unlike Steve Rogers, Superman believes that all heroes no matter how powerful they are still need to answer to the people.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 23, 2019 18:51:38 GMT
If you dislike MCU movies, this thread is not for you. If you believe DCEU and Fox X-Men movies are generally better than MCU movies, this is not for you either. If you think the MCU is ruining cinema, this is not for you. If majority of the threads you make in this forum are anti-MCU, this thread is definitely not for you. This question is directed for those hardcore MCU fans who think the MCU generally creates the best superhero movies ever. Who feel that the praise the MCU gets is truly deserved. Who thinks that the MCU has completely left DC and Fox superhero movies in the dust (barring a few good ones from those studios). And the question is this: What things irritate you the most about the MCU? What are your most legitimate complaints against the MCU? P.S. - I actually consider myself a hardcore MCU fan, and I will contribute my own answer to this thread in a bit.The most legitimate complaint against MCU is that MCU movies is that MCU Dictator Kevin Feige just has no clue about what being a true superhero is about. Because as I've proven many times, MCU's so-called "heroes" aren't true superheroes but just a bunch of selfish assholes who always put their own agenda ahead of innocent people's lives and who always think that they don't have to answer to the people or be held accountable for their actions because they believe in the paradigm that " Might Makes Right" and since they consider themselves "Earth's mightiest heroes", that gives them the Right to do whatever they want whenever they want without any restrictions or oversight and without having to answer to anyone or be held accountable.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 23, 2019 18:44:29 GMT
It actually makes a lot of difference. Like I said, he would have to break in. Now what do you think would’ve happened if he did? He gets arrested by the campus police, or he gets labeled as some campus perv trying to target someone at night, or he has to break in the campus building then break the lock on the lab as Banner. And that lab would probably have a night alarm on it. Any of these scenarios turning out to be safer or have better odds of working? So basically you're saying that Banner had 2 choices: 1. Go to the university during the day. More civilians would be around and thus more civilian lives would be at risk, but odds of Banner getting caught are lower. or 2. Go the university during the night. Less civilians would be around and thus less civilian lives would be at risk, but odds f Banner getting caught are higher. And you're basically saying that Banner thought that his not getting caught was more important the number of civilian lives that would be at risk so instead of choosing to MINIMIZE the risk to civilian lives, Banner chose to MAXIMIZE the risk to civilian lives and put his own agenda ahead of innocent people's lives. Thanks for proving once again that I'm 100% correct that MCU's so-called "heroes" aren't true heroes but just selfish assholes who are always putting their agenda ahead of innocent people's lives and I'm 100% correct the MCU Dictator Kevin Fiege just has no clue what being a true hero is about. And that's why I dislike MCU movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 22, 2019 2:41:49 GMT
Week 12
Sunday November 24th
1:00pm
Tampa Bay @ Atlanta
Denver @ Buffalo
NY Giants @ Chicago
Pittsburgh @ Cincinnati
Miami @ Cleveland
Carolina @ New Orleans
Oakland @ NY Jets
Seattle @ Philadelphia
Detroit @ Washington
4:05am
Jacksonville @ Tennessee
4:25pm
Dallas @ New England
8:20pm
Green Bay @ San Francisco
Monday November 25th
8:15pm
Baltimore @ LA Rams
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 22, 2019 0:02:04 GMT
Week 12
Thursday November 21st
8:20pm EST
Indianapolis @ Houston
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 18, 2019 22:45:41 GMT
I never said that. That 78% stuff was yours. I even said I wasn't even sure your stats were correct. And I wasn't going to waste my time checking them. All I said was the Patriots don't have the pressure on them, other teams have. Because they are in a perennially bad division every year. And this year they are in the weaker conference. So therefore, they don't have to try as hard. They don't have to sacrifice as much. They don't have to endure as much. And resultingly, they are fresher for the post season. The stats are accurate. But your factless opinion still doesn't hold water. And is still far different than what I posted in this thread. The Patriots are just better than you. And they know it. That's why they don't have to go balls deep to beat the Eagles. Probably why they won't have to go balls deep to beat the Cowboys. Division had nothing to do with it, because they beat everybody in the NFL outside of their own division damn near 8 out of 10 times. Playing in a wesk division every year for 2 decades and cheating is what sccounts for that. |
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 17, 2019 22:12:47 GMT
Agreed. The receiver caught the ball outside the end zone, took a step into the end zone, went down in the end zone with possession of the ball, and then the defender took the ball out of the receiver's hands. Nice of you to join the discussion. I was looking for your posts about the Cowboys big win and I didn't see any. Strange. I have more class than Pats' fans and don't need to brag every time my team wins.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 17, 2019 22:10:04 GMT
that was a td he had possession and was down - then the ball was ripped out Agreed. The receiver caught the ball outside the end zone, took a step into the end zone, went down in the end zone with possession of the ball, and then the defender took the ball out of the receiver's hands.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 17, 2019 22:09:21 GMT
That's an Eagles TD. The receiver caught the ball outside the end zone, took a step into the end zone, went down in the end zone with possession of the ball, and then the defender took the ball out of the receiver's hands.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 17, 2019 16:46:57 GMT
That still doesn't explain why he had to go to the university during the day when there were plenty of civilians around. If he was going to sneak in, then it would've made more sense to sneak in at night when there are fewer people around. Because he could con his way in. Why not at night? Because he would have to break in. That's as stupid as a group of bank robbers telling their getaway driver to wait outside the bank in the car, but make sure he doesn't park in a tow-away zone. Sneaking in or breaking in, either way, he's illegally entering an area where he's not authorized to enter. So it makes no difference if he sneaks in or breaks in. But sneaking in or breaking in at night puts less civilian lives at risk since there'll be a lot fewer civilians around at night. And how would he know if he would be a risk? He was getting his ass kicked before Bucky stepped in and saved him so he already knows he can't fight. So why the fuck would Rogers want to join the Army when he knows he can't fight and knows he would be a liability on the battlefield and knows he would put his fellow soldiers at risk on the battlefield since they would have to not only fight their own battles but also fight Rogers' battles as well? Rogers' wanting to join the Army when he knows he can't fight and would be a liability on the battlefield against Nazi soldiers is as selfish as a guy who can't swim wanted to be a lifeguard.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 17, 2019 16:33:58 GMT
And yet, you claimed that CIA agent Everett Ross gave the alleged kill order and said there would be no trial. If US laws have nothing to do with it, then neither should a US spy who has no jurisdiction or authority in a foreign country. Heck, even Black Panther made no sense at all. Klaue is arrested by Korean cops on Korean soil, but is questioned by a US spy and a Wakandan national without any Korean official present? That's just another example of bad writing in MCU movies! Yes because Everett Ross is the deputy commander of the joint counter terrorist unit, as in the people assigned under the UN to deal with the situation, key words in all of that are commander and joint, meaning he is a command position and he is in a position where he does infact have jurisdiction outside the US, and the forces sent to capture Bucky were under his orders.
Once again, you demonstrate your inconsistency and hypocrisy. You wrote "before you mention the DA and US constitutions and all that bullshit, keep in mind the US has illegally detained mere suspected terrorist indefinitely in the past, without trial in this millennium". If this is a UN operation in a foreign country and not a US operation, then what the fuck does the US detaining suspected terrorists indefinitely in the past have to do with anything?The fact that this is a UN (i.e. international) operation makes it even MORE LIKELY that Bucky will get a trial. Because international organizations like the UN love big trials because trials are what differentiates them from tyrants. Tyrants make the unilateral decision on who's innocent or guilty and don't give trials. The UN, which often opposes and sanctions tyrants, gives trials.
Ever heard of the Nuremberg trials? If they didn't deny Nazi war criminals a trial, then they're not going to deny Bucky a trial either. That's why the UN has an International Criminal Court. So like I said, if Bucky was charged with terrorism, he was getting a trial in an international court. And if Bucky was charged with the murder of the Starks, he was getting a trial in a state court in the US. Either way, Bucky was going to get his day in court and his opportunity to present his alleged "brainwashing" defense in court to a jury. But Steve Rogers didn't want Bucky to go on trial because Steve Rogers is a selfish asshole and power-hungry tyrant who wants to be the sole judge and jury to decide who's innocent or guilty without any trial, exactly the way that a tyrant does.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 17, 2019 1:49:34 GMT
1st, I haven't spread any libel. I've just state what was shown in the movies. 2nd, if Steve wanted to help an alleged brainwashing victim, then bring in him peacefully so doctors can examine him and help him. How the fuck does it help an alleged brainwashing victim who already murdered 2 civilians to flee from the authorities, which would result in the alleged brainwashing victim being hunted by law enforcement, not to mention the fact that it would also endanger law enforcement officers as well as civilians and would also help other criminals commit and get away with crimes against innocent people?Partly because I’m not in the best shape right now, I will not bother to answer these diatribes. Basically, you have no answer for the fact that Steve Rogers isn't a hero but just a selfish asshole who doesn't give a shit about endangering innocent people's lives.
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Nov 17, 2019 1:47:47 GMT
And as I already explained to you a gazillion times (but you don't seem to comprehend), that's for a jury of the people to decide. Bucky can present his argument that he was brainwashed to a jury of the people, but it should be a jury of the people to decide since murder is a crime against the people. What do other countries' rules have to do with this? Bucky murdered the Starks in the US so any murder charges against Bucky would be filed by a US court, not a foreign country's court. Well you keep going on about US laws this and that yet Bucky is not under arrest or suspicion of the Stark's death at all in this film, that has noting to do with anything happening, he is arrested under suspicion of committing a terroristic attack at the UN, the US constitution, US district or state DA's have nothing to do with this, yet you keep bringing them up, you seem unable to grasp the actual events of the film.
And yet, you claimed that CIA agent Everett Ross gave the alleged kill order and said there would be no trial. If US laws have nothing to do with it, then neither should a US spy who has no jurisdiction or authority in a foreign country. Heck, even Black Panther made no sense at all. Klaue is arrested by Korean cops on Korean soil, but is questioned by a US spy and a Wakandan national without any Korean official present? That's just another example of bad writing in MCU movies!
|
|
