|
Post by Skaathar on May 22, 2018 8:50:24 GMT
How would you rate X-men's full CGI characters like Colossus, Juggernaut, Silver Samurai, etc. against other studios' CGI characters. DC has characters like Doomsday, Steppenwolf and Ares while the MCU has Hulk, Thanos, Cull Obsidian, etc. How does the X-men franchise hold up in the CGI character department?
|
|
|
Post by scabab on May 22, 2018 8:56:28 GMT
I'd say not as well. They look fine in general but Juggernaut had a bit of an iffy looking face.
I don't think they looked as good as those others you mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by charzhino on May 22, 2018 9:41:18 GMT
Not as well, but its somewhat an unfair comparison when theres not been much need for CGI characters until quite recently.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 24, 2018 18:45:20 GMT
I liked Colossus fine. I thought the design for Silver Samurai was cool even thought it was a 'meh' character.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on May 24, 2018 20:07:04 GMT
Some look alright, some look terrible. That pretty much summons up the entire comic book movie genre.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on May 24, 2018 22:05:28 GMT
Some look alright, some look terrible. That pretty much summons up the entire comic book movie genre. Which ones looked alright? As good as DC and MCU CGI characters?
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Jun 1, 2018 7:50:23 GMT
Juggernaut looks like a plastic toy, Steppenwolf looks like he's from a PS3 cutscene. I'd say MCU fares best in this department
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Jun 11, 2018 1:34:54 GMT
They’re fine. They don’t look realistic but I almost don’t expect them to in a Deadpool movie.
|
|