|
Post by Cody™ on Jun 6, 2018 8:14:24 GMT
Yes seriously.
I mean you couldn’t make this stuff up folks. Liberals ruin everything.
It’s as ridiculous as saying the Super Bowl will no longer be decided by the team who score the most points.
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Jun 6, 2018 14:57:30 GMT
Yes seriously. I mean you couldn’t make this stuff up folks. Liberals ruin everything. It’s as ridiculous as saying the Super Bowl will no longer be decided by the team who score the most points. Yeah, seriously. How can you properly judge a woman if you can't see her belly button?
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jun 6, 2018 15:12:00 GMT
Yes seriously. I mean you couldn’t make this stuff up folks. Liberals ruin everything. It’s as ridiculous as saying the Super Bowl will no longer be decided by the team who score the most points. Yeah, seriously. How can you properly judge a woman if you can't see her belly button? Miss America is a pageant where traditionally the candidates are judged primarily on their physical beauty, that’s why it’s called a BEAUTY pageant. Nobody really cares what comes out of their mouth. There are separate competitions out there for that kind of stuff.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Jun 6, 2018 15:23:33 GMT
Yeah, seriously. How can you properly judge a woman if you can't see her belly button? Miss America is a pageant where traditionally the candidates are judged primarily on their physical beauty, that’s why it’s called a BEAUTY pageant. Nobody really cares what comes out of their mouth. There are separate competitions out there for that kind of stuff. For Cody, beauty is only skin deep.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2018 15:24:10 GMT
Miss America is a pageant where traditionally the candidates are judged primarily on their physical beauty, that’s why it’s called a BEAUTY pageant. Nobody really cares what comes out of their mouth. There are separate competitions out there for that kind of stuff. For Cody, beauty is only skin deep. So said Jesus
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jun 6, 2018 15:25:15 GMT
I do not know about American contest but miss universe and miss world have often been decided on basis of region that advertisers want to push their products. Often there were periods in which women from any one region will regularly win miss universe/miss world contests and then the cosmetic industry will see huge growth in that region or country. All in all, a pretty useless competition.
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Jun 6, 2018 15:25:50 GMT
Yeah, seriously. How can you properly judge a woman if you can't see her belly button? Miss America is a pageant where traditionally the candidates are judged primarily on their physical beauty, that’s why it’s called a BEAUTY pageant. Nobody really cares what comes out of their mouth. There are separate competitions out there for that kind of stuff. So I guess your traditional values would mean that you would support replacing the "talent" category with a "biggest tits" category.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jun 6, 2018 15:40:36 GMT
Miss America is a pageant where traditionally the candidates are judged primarily on their physical beauty, that’s why it’s called a BEAUTY pageant. Nobody really cares what comes out of their mouth. There are separate competitions out there for that kind of stuff. So I guess your traditional values would mean that you would support replacing the "talent" category with a "biggest tits" category. I see that went over your head. The whole point of a beauty pageant is to pick the physically most beautiful woman. To say a beauty pageant will no longer be judged on physical appearance defeats its own main purpose. It’s akin to announcing that the 100meter sprint will no longer be decided by the fastest runner.
|
|
The Lost One
Junior Member
@lostkiera
Posts: 2,677
Likes: 1,302
|
Post by The Lost One on Jun 6, 2018 15:41:30 GMT
I actually don't really have a problem with beauty pageants as such. After all we have competitions that award people for being strong, fast or knowledgeable. Like these traits, beauty requires a natural strong starting point that then needs to be cultivated.
The problem with them is they're too narrow - they focus on female beauty as seen by the typical straight man. Expand them by allowing all genders and standards of beauty (perhaps not all in the same pageant for practical reasons).
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Jun 6, 2018 15:53:49 GMT
Yeah, this was on TV news last night. An entire minute or more of half hour world news for something that less than 500 people in the entire world are affected by one iota, and which less than 1000 people in the whole Universe care one iota about.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jun 6, 2018 18:12:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jun 6, 2018 18:16:39 GMT
If I actually still watched TV, I might vaguley, sort of, kind of care.
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jun 6, 2018 18:19:44 GMT
Yes seriously. I mean you couldn’t make this stuff up folks. Liberals ruin everything. It’s as ridiculous as saying the Super Bowl will no longer be decided by the team who score the most points. Couldn't agree with you more, Cody.
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jun 6, 2018 18:21:14 GMT
Miss America is a pageant where traditionally the candidates are judged primarily on their physical beauty, that’s why it’s called a BEAUTY pageant. Nobody really cares what comes out of their mouth. There are separate competitions out there for that kind of stuff. For Cody, beauty is only skin deep. It's not only skin deep but it's stupid to pretend that it has nothing to do with skin.
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
|
Post by Lugh on Jun 6, 2018 18:29:56 GMT
"Objectification" in the way the feminists use it does not seem to be a coherent concept to me. Could someone who believes this is a coherent concept explain how it's coherent?
It's sad how we are going backwards in terms of sexual issues. The sexual revolution was a big step forwards but now liberals are taking a big step backwards. They aren't consistent about it as well which is annoying.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2018 18:54:33 GMT
Meh. They can judge women on whatever criteria they like.
Just so long as women are being judged. That's the main thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2018 19:27:50 GMT
So I guess your traditional values would mean that you would support replacing the "talent" category with a "biggest tits" category. I see that went over your head. The whole point of a beauty pageant is to pick the physically most beautiful woman. To say a beauty pageant will no longer be judged on physical appearance defeats its own main purpose. 1 Timothy 2:9 In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;
10 But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Jun 6, 2018 19:31:56 GMT
even the virgin mary had tremendously huge knockers.
|
|
Lugh
Sophomore
@dcu
Posts: 848
Likes: 77
|
Post by Lugh on Jun 6, 2018 20:11:45 GMT
Meh. They can judge women on whatever criteria they like. Just so long as women are being judged. That's the main thing. They're ruining it people for the people who want to see particular things. They have no righg to do that. Are the people who are cheering this on actually watchers of the show? I don't think so.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 6, 2018 20:55:54 GMT
Meh. They can judge women on whatever criteria they like. Just so long as women are being judged. That's the main thing. They're ruining it people for the people who want to see particular things. That's awful, just awful.
|
|