|
|
Post by Power Ranger on Jun 13, 2018 20:44:58 GMT
He knew where he lived and where his costume was stashed. He knew this because he surveilled Peter’s bedroom. If Peter was ever naked in any of that footage it’s actually child pornography and Tony should be investigated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Jun 13, 2018 20:54:12 GMT
DC-Fan did that one already.
|
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jun 13, 2018 21:00:19 GMT
Been done. Pretty desperate if you have to resort to emulating DC-Fan
|
|
|
|
Post by Power Ranger on Jun 13, 2018 21:16:54 GMT
Been done. Pretty desperate if you have to resort to emulating DC-Fan I never read that. I figured it out independently. Why can’t MCU fans admit it? |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jun 13, 2018 21:17:22 GMT
He knew where he lived and where his costume was stashed. He knew this because he surveilled Peter’s bedroom. If Peter was ever naked in any of that footage it’s actually child pornography and Tony should be investigated. Damn son, you're serious about this child pornography hobby of yours. Or is it more of a vocation at this point? Hee hee hee... Tony didn't know Spider-Man was a minor when he started investigating him. And he also wasn't 100% certain that Peter was Spider-Man when he visited his apartment. At that point, Peter was more of a suspect than a perfect match. You don't have to physically surveil someone to find out where they live; public records are a boon in that regard. Shortly after Tony enters Peter's room, he gives it a quick visual inspection and notices the recessed ceiling panel that serves no functional purpose in the bedroom of a typical NYC apartment. When he sees Peter's desk, he asks him about the electronics on it. It doesn't make sense that he would do that if he'd seen the room before and all of its contents. No, Tony is just your average, garden-variety genius who was able to piece together Spider-Man's identity by triangulating his areas of activities and correlating that with high-IQ individuals in the city who could have formulated super-tensile strength webbing fluid to use as a means of transportation. A genius IQ, careful observation, deductive reasoning and some time well spent on YouTube is all it took. Your dreams of "child pornography" and gay subtext are better suited for another dynamic duo. A good sleep indeed...  |
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Jun 13, 2018 23:23:43 GMT
He knew where he lived and where his costume was stashed. He knew this because he surveilled Peter’s bedroom. If Peter was ever naked in any of that footage it’s actually child pornography and Tony should be investigated. Well, someone wasn't paying attention to the movie. You really need to let go of this pedophilia obsession of yours. |
|
|
|
Post by Power Ranger on Jun 14, 2018 4:49:43 GMT
He knew where he lived and where his costume was stashed. He knew this because he surveilled Peter’s bedroom. If Peter was ever naked in any of that footage it’s actually child pornography and Tony should be investigated. Damn son, you're serious about this child pornography hobby of yours. Or is it more of a vocation at this point? Hee hee hee... Tony didn't know Spider-Man was a minor when he started investigating him. And he also wasn't 100% certain that Peter was Spider-Man when he visited his apartment. At that point, Peter was more of a suspect than a perfect match. You don't have to physically surveil someone to find out where they live; public records are a boon in that regard. Shortly after Tony enters Peter's room, he gives it a quick visual inspection and notices the recessed ceiling panel that serves no functional purpose in the bedroom of a typical NYC apartment. When he sees Peter's desk, he asks him about the electronics on it. It doesn't make sense that he would do that if he'd seen the room before and all of its contents. No, Tony is just your average, garden-variety genius who was able to piece together Spider-Man's identity by triangulating his areas of activities and correlating that with high-IQ individuals in the city who could have formulated super-tensile strength webbing fluid to use as a means of transportation. A genius IQ, careful observation, deductive reasoning and some time well spent on YouTube is all it took. Your dreams of "child pornography" and gay subtext are better suited for another dynamic duo. A good sleep indeed... Tony isn’t a profiler. He is a technical genius only. It’s more likely that his drone and satellite surveillance discovered Peter. Oh and not knowing that someone is underage when you observe them naked is no excuse. Good luck with that. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Death Man on Jun 14, 2018 6:23:11 GMT
Damn son, you're serious about this child pornography hobby of yours. Or is it more of a vocation at this point? Hee hee hee... Tony didn't know Spider-Man was a minor when he started investigating him. And he also wasn't 100% certain that Peter was Spider-Man when he visited his apartment. At that point, Peter was more of a suspect than a perfect match. You don't have to physically surveil someone to find out where they live; public records are a boon in that regard. Shortly after Tony enters Peter's room, he gives it a quick visual inspection and notices the recessed ceiling panel that serves no functional purpose in the bedroom of a typical NYC apartment. When he sees Peter's desk, he asks him about the electronics on it. It doesn't make sense that he would do that if he'd seen the room before and all of its contents. No, Tony is just your average, garden-variety genius who was able to piece together Spider-Man's identity by triangulating his areas of activities and correlating that with high-IQ individuals in the city who could have formulated super-tensile strength webbing fluid to use as a means of transportation. A genius IQ, careful observation, deductive reasoning and some time well spent on YouTube is all it took. Your dreams of "child pornography" and gay subtext are better suited for another dynamic duo. A good sleep indeed... Tony isn’t a profiler. He is a technical genius only. It’s more likely that his drone and satellite surveillance discovered Peter. Oh and not knowing that someone is underage when you observe them naked is no excuse. Good luck with that. No, it is not more likely, or he would have shown Peter his crisp and clean "drone footage" as proof and not janky YouTube cellphone clips. Why not show Peter a clip of himself getting into the homemade suit if he had that in your fantasy "drone" footage? Your theory makes no sense and is profoundly deranged. You're just a pedophile enthusiast. You're a pedophile for pedophiles. Now, since your left hand is free... Hee hee hee... |
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Jun 14, 2018 16:45:55 GMT
Been done. Pretty desperate if you have to resort to emulating DC-Fan I never read that. I figured it out independently. Why can’t MCU fans admit it? Oh I'll admit you never read. |
|
