Eλευθερί
Junior Member
@eleutheri
Posts: 3,710
Likes: 1,670
|
Post by Eλευθερί on Jun 14, 2018 22:38:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 14, 2018 23:09:19 GMT
...and then there is 'religious discussion'.
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jun 15, 2018 0:13:18 GMT
...and then there is 'religious discussion'. ... which takes far more talent.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 15, 2018 0:20:31 GMT
...and then there is 'religious discussion'. ... which takes far more talent. ...not if you just avow that 'God created everything' without the slightest evidence so there is nothing more to discuss. Any fool can do that...and they do!
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jun 15, 2018 0:26:32 GMT
... which takes far more talent. ...not if you just avow that 'God created everything' without the slightest evidence so there is nothing more to discuss. Any fool can do that...and they do! It also takes far more talent to follow religious discussion. You haven't been following it so well as you guess.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 15, 2018 0:32:46 GMT
...not if you just avow that 'God created everything' without the slightest evidence so there is nothing more to discuss. Any fool can do that...and they do! It also takes far more talent to follow religious discussion. You haven't been following it so well as you guess. I really don't see much benefit in following it at all, since it is comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy. The basic premise is deeply flawed so there is no foundation upon which to build a logical argument.
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jun 15, 2018 0:39:48 GMT
It also takes far more talent to follow religious discussion. You haven't been following it so well as you guess. I really don't see much benefit in following it at all, since it is comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy. The basic premise is deeply flawed so there is no foundation upon which to build a logical argument. That's just your opinion based on your limited perception and feeble imagination.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 15, 2018 0:42:05 GMT
I really don't see much benefit in following it at all, since it is comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy. The basic premise is deeply flawed so there is no foundation upon which to build a logical argument. That's just your opinion based on your limited perception and feeble imagination. Back atcha sunshine! At least I have 'real' science on my side!
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jun 15, 2018 0:46:25 GMT
That's just your opinion based on your limited perception and feeble imagination. Back atcha sunshine! At least I have 'real' science on my side! That's what they all say, Mz. Creativity.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 15, 2018 0:58:31 GMT
Back atcha sunshine! At least I have 'real' science on my side! That's what they all say, Mz. Creativity. Well, as your God would say 'First you have to believe in it!' We are both wise like that.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 15, 2018 1:29:18 GMT
It also takes far more talent to follow religious discussion. You haven't been following it so well as you guess. I really don't see much benefit in following it at all, since it is comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy. The basic premise is deeply flawed so there is no foundation upon which to build a logical argument. Are you aware that the catchall religious discussion must include both sides of any argument? Are you SURE it is ALL "comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy"?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 15, 2018 2:08:20 GMT
I really don't see much benefit in following it at all, since it is comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy. The basic premise is deeply flawed so there is no foundation upon which to build a logical argument. Are you aware that the catchall religious discussion must include both sides of any argument? Are you SURE it is ALL "comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy"? Yep.
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jun 15, 2018 2:41:49 GMT
Are you aware that the catchall religious discussion must include both sides of any argument? Are you SURE it is ALL "comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy"? Yep. And it's not the end of the world yet.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 15, 2018 2:44:44 GMT
Are you aware that the catchall religious discussion must include both sides of any argument? Are you SURE it is ALL "comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy"? Yep. Which would of course include your side of the argument.
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jun 15, 2018 3:01:39 GMT
People should try that here.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 15, 2018 3:16:09 GMT
Yep. Which would of course include your side of the argument.
Read again. My 'side' has 'real science' on its side. Feel free to disprove it.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 17, 2018 20:50:16 GMT
Which would of course include your side of the argument.
Read again. My 'side' has 'real science' on its side. Feel free to disprove it. Try reading what you wrote again, you clearly (fuck you erjen) say that ALL the discussion of religion is "comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy"? That would include both sides of the discussion, ie yours too.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 17, 2018 22:28:01 GMT
Read again. My 'side' has 'real science' on its side. Feel free to disprove it. Try reading what you wrote again, you clearly (fuck you erjen) say that ALL the discussion of religion is "comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy"? That would include both sides of the discussion, ie yours too. For the pedant, let me amend my statement which was aimed at Arlon, yet clearly others are free to join in.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 17, 2018 23:00:28 GMT
Try reading what you wrote again, you clearly (fuck you erjen) say that ALL the discussion of religion is "comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy"? That would include both sides of the discussion, ie yours too. For the pedant, let me amend my statement which was aimed at Arlon, yet clearly others are free to join in. Excellent, now it's not written badly, it's just wrong.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 18, 2018 2:11:07 GMT
For the pedant, let me amend my statement which was aimed at Arlon, yet clearly others are free to join in. Excellent, now it's not written badly, it's just wrong. I disagree.
|
|