|
Post by gadreel on Jun 18, 2018 21:48:48 GMT
Excellent, now it's not written badly, it's just wrong. I disagree. I am sure you do, that does not make it correct.
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Jun 18, 2018 22:54:36 GMT
Has the Socratic dialog started yet?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 18, 2018 23:32:45 GMT
I am sure you do, that does not make it correct. ...nor whatever 'your opinion on the matter is.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 18, 2018 23:49:35 GMT
I am sure you do, that does not make it correct. ...nor whatever 'your opinion on the matter is. My opinion has a much higher chance of being correct, I am not making sweeping generalisations based on incomplete data.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 19, 2018 0:00:49 GMT
...nor whatever 'your opinion on the matter is. My opinion has a much higher chance of being correct, I am not making sweeping generalisations based on incomplete data.
...that God exists? I don't think so. You can argue semantics if you like. That dude that Clusium just posted had a red hot go and only ended up with the same God of the Gaps crapola..you got anything else?
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 19, 2018 1:43:45 GMT
My opinion has a much higher chance of being correct, I am not making sweeping generalisations based on incomplete data.
...that God exists? I don't think so. You can argue semantics if you like. That dude that Clusium just posted had a red hot go and only ended up with the same God of the Gaps crapola..you got anything else? are you going to make up a stance for me and tell me it is wrong? do you need me at all for this conversation?
|
|
Eλευθερί
Junior Member
@eleutheri
Posts: 3,710
Likes: 1,670
|
Post by Eλευθερί on Jun 19, 2018 1:55:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 19, 2018 2:07:14 GMT
...that God exists? I don't think so. You can argue semantics if you like. That dude that Clusium just posted had a red hot go and only ended up with the same God of the Gaps crapola..you got anything else? are you going to make up a stance for me and tell me it is wrong? do you need me at all for this conversation? Feel free, have I stopped you? So far you have admonished me for MY opinion.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 19, 2018 2:17:17 GMT
are you going to make up a stance for me and tell me it is wrong? do you need me at all for this conversation? Feel free, have I stopped you? So far you have admonished me for MY opinion. no. I have admonished you for you blatantly false generalisation and your claim that clearly (fuck you erjen) included you as contributing to a discussion in a manner " comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Post by OpiateOfTheMasses on Jun 19, 2018 11:13:02 GMT
Excellent, now it's not written badly, it's just wrong. I disagree. Me too.
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jun 19, 2018 16:23:05 GMT
Exactly.
I'm the perfect example of answering a question asked!
Its the follow-up questions &/or assumption made that are silly. That thread was full of that nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 20, 2018 2:01:54 GMT
Feel free, have I stopped you? So far you have admonished me for MY opinion. no. I have admonished you for you blatantly false generalisation and your claim that clearly (fuck you erjen) included you as contributing to a discussion in a manner " comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy. What else can it be, if it is NOT founded on fact, is self perpetuating by confirmation bias and used to force people to believe based on fear of such concepts as Hell if you don't believe the script AND is inconsistent in its supposedly perfect and objective morality, as evidenced by the diverse range of denominations in Christianity?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 21, 2018 0:02:49 GMT
Feel free, have I stopped you? So far you have admonished me for MY opinion. no. I have admonished you for you blatantly false generalisation and your claim that clearly (fuck you erjen) included you as contributing to a discussion in a manner " comprised solely of illogical, unsubstantiated claims based on myth, wishful thinking, fear and hypocrisy. I am going to quote Film Flaneur from another thread here.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 21, 2018 17:04:55 GMT
For the pedant, let me amend my statement which was aimed at Arlon, yet clearly others are free to join in. Excellent, now it's not written badly, it's just wrong. Reminds me of the drunken, impassioned-but-lamentable monologues you'd get from college freshmen just beginning to break from their religious upbringing, dipping a guilty toe into atheism and playing about with the notion of "sheeple" conversation devices.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 21, 2018 19:20:22 GMT
Excellent, now it's not written badly, it's just wrong. Reminds me of the drunken, impassioned-but-lamentable monologues you'd get from college freshmen just beginning to break from their religious upbringing, dipping a guilty toe into atheism and playing about with the notion of "sheeple" conversation devices. People who use the phrases sheeple and woke agitate me
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on Jun 21, 2018 19:22:58 GMT
Reminds me of the drunken, impassioned-but-lamentable monologues you'd get from college freshmen just beginning to break from their religious upbringing, dipping a guilty toe into atheism and playing about with the notion of "sheeple" conversation devices. People who use the phrases sheeple and woke agitate me "Woke" makes me cringe. I get it, but we didn't need a new word. Also: "Unpack". As in "Oh, gosh, that response... there's a lot to unpack here..." No, there isn't. It's language, not luggage.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 21, 2018 19:30:05 GMT
People who use the phrases sheeple and woke agitate me "Woke" makes me cringe. I get it, but we didn't need a new word. Also: "Unpack". As in "Oh, gosh, that response... there's a lot to unpack here..." No, there isn't. It's language, not luggage. I can kind of get 'unpack' depending on a statement there is often hidden nuances that need to be opened up or something and unpack kind of works, and to be fair it is actually part of the definition. But yeah a lot of people ho use that phrase tend to be about to patronise you.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jun 21, 2018 21:35:31 GMT
"Woke" makes me cringe. I get it, but we didn't need a new word. Also: "Unpack". As in "Oh, gosh, that response... there's a lot to unpack here..." No, there isn't. It's language, not luggage. I can kind of get 'unpack' depending on a statement there is often hidden nuances that need to be opened up or something and unpack kind of works, and to be fair it is actually part of the definition. But yeah a lot of people ho use that phrase tend to be about to patronise you. Being reminded of things, as an antipodean and father you might know the cute little hand gam you play with toddlers where you link your fingers of our two hands in a kind of fist, then make a steeple with two extended little fingers,then flip your hands over open your thumbs and wave all your fingers. ie… " Here is the church and here is the steeple, open the doors and here are the 'sheeple'!
|
|