|
Post by moviemaniac22 on Mar 20, 2017 20:40:42 GMT
Last year when I seen her birth year on wikipedia, it was stated 1989. Just recently when I checked again it has been changed to 1987. Why do they do this? Did her promoters or managers think she will get flooded with movies if she under aged herself early in her career?
|
|
|
Post by amit654321 on Mar 21, 2017 4:14:08 GMT
Whatever. Shraddha is my favourite. Be it 1989 or 87. Her pronunciation of words is best in bollywood.
|
|
|
Post by pimpinainteasy on Mar 21, 2017 8:18:26 GMT
its 1987 according to IMDB. so she is 30 now. so is KANGNA RANAUT. YAMI GAUTAM etc. 30 is not that old anymore for a heroine.
|
|
|
Post by moviemaniac22 on Mar 21, 2017 19:46:11 GMT
She's still got a long way to go in terms of acting. She is good looking no doubt but I don't think she will ever have the appeal of urmila, priety or rani. She can't even match up to Parineeti, whose acting I'm quiet impressed with.
|
|
|
Post by pimpinainteasy on Mar 22, 2017 2:29:46 GMT
She's still got a long way to go in terms of acting. She is good looking no doubt but I don't think she will ever have the appeal of urmila, priety or rani. She can't even match up to Parineeti, whose acting I'm quiet impressed with. even i think PARINEETI is pretty good. but she comes across as too childish in her interviews.
|
|