|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jul 24, 2018 8:24:47 GMT
Just another hysterical third wave feminist who doesn’t have a clue what she’s talking about. Mindlessly supporting something she’s been brainwashed to believe to be a ‘progressive’ cause.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jul 25, 2018 14:59:37 GMT
Just another hysterical third wave feminist who doesn’t have a clue what she’s talking about. Mindlessly supporting something she’s been brainwashed to believe to be a ‘progressive’ cause. But he's just saying the same stupid shit that's been said a million times before |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jul 25, 2018 15:11:07 GMT
Just another hysterical third wave feminist who doesn’t have a clue what she’s talking about. Mindlessly supporting something she’s been brainwashed to believe to be a ‘progressive’ cause. But he's just saying the same stupid shit that's been said a million times before And yet it’s still enough to refute every one of the desperate arguments she utters. |
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jul 25, 2018 15:20:49 GMT
But he's just saying the same stupid shit that's been said a million times before And yet it’s still enough to refute every one of the desperate arguments she utters. I couldn't hear her very well (I'm on my phone and I was trying to listen just via the phone's crappy speaker). If that cliched nonsense from the pastor was enough to refute anything he'd have to be talking to an utter moron. Or it's a matter of maybe you not understanding what a refutation is very well, or kinda just doing a "Yeah! Those old tired cliches really hit the spot!" |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jul 25, 2018 15:26:59 GMT
And yet it’s still enough to refute every one of the desperate arguments she utters. I couldn't hear her very well (I'm on my phone and I was trying to listen just via the phone's crappy speaker). If that cliched nonsense from the pastor was enough to refute anything he'd have to be talking to an utter moron. Or it's a matter of maybe you not understanding what a refutation is very well, or kinda just doing a "Yeah! Those old tired cliches really hit the spot!" How about you go somewhere quiet and actually listen to what’s being said before jumping to conclusions? Is that too much to ask, little buddy? |
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jul 25, 2018 15:32:24 GMT
I couldn't hear her very well (I'm on my phone and I was trying to listen just via the phone's crappy speaker). If that cliched nonsense from the pastor was enough to refute anything he'd have to be talking to an utter moron. Or it's a matter of maybe you not understanding what a refutation is very well, or kinda just doing a "Yeah! Those old tired cliches really hit the spot!" How about you go somewhere quiet and actually listen to what’s being said before jumping to conclusions? Is that too much to ask, little buddy? Not possible but it doesn't matter. The pastor isn't going to stop spouting cliched bullcrap just because I can hear the woman better |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jul 25, 2018 17:30:53 GMT
How about you go somewhere quiet and actually listen to what’s being said before jumping to conclusions? Is that too much to ask, little buddy? Not possible but it doesn't matter. The pastor isn't going to stop spouting cliched bullcrap just because I can hear the woman better Be specific. What is it that the pastor spouted that you find objectionable? |
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jul 25, 2018 17:35:50 GMT
Not possible but it doesn't matter. The pastor isn't going to stop spouting cliched bullcrap just because I can hear the woman better Be specific. What is it that the pastor spouted that you find objectionable? It's the same old stupid stuff. For example, the comment about being a human being at conception, as if anyone who isn't an idiot is suggesting that we're not talking about human beings at conception. |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jul 25, 2018 17:42:10 GMT
Be specific. What is it that the pastor spouted that you find objectionable? It's the same old stupid stuff. For example, the comment about being a human being at conception, as if anyone who isn't an idiot is suggesting that we're not talking about human beings at conception. Did you not hear that dopey pro-choicer call it j ust a cluster of cells”?Idiots like Goz and Lowtacks like to use that same argument on here. |
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jul 25, 2018 17:49:05 GMT
It's the same old stupid stuff. For example, the comment about being a human being at conception, as if anyone who isn't an idiot is suggesting that we're not talking about human beings at conception. Did you not hear that dopey pro-choicer call it “just a clump of cells”? Idiots like Goz and Lowtacks like to use that same argument on here. Human beings are just clumps of cells more or less. Pro choice arguments don't involve arguing that the clumps of cells aren't human beings. The arguments have to do with properties the clumps of cells/human beings have at different points of development. |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jul 25, 2018 18:04:32 GMT
Did you not hear that dopey pro-choicer call it “just a clump of cells”? Idiots like Goz and Lowtacks like to use that same argument on here. Human beings are just clumps of cells more or less. Pro choice arguments don't involve arguing that the clumps of cells aren't human beings. The arguments have to do with properties the clumps of cells/human beings have at different points of development. A human being is a human being. We all go through the same developmental stages. Nobody should have the right to end the clump of cells/human beings life based on their lack of properties. Don’t murder the fetus and in time it will obtain those properties just like everyone else. If the mother doesn’t feel she can support the child then the ethical thing to do is give it up for adoption. |
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Jul 25, 2018 18:09:15 GMT
Human beings are just clumps of cells more or less. Pro choice arguments don't involve arguing that the clumps of cells aren't human beings. The arguments have to do with properties the clumps of cells/human beings have at different points of development. A human being is a human being. We all go through the same developmental stages. Nobody should have the right to end the clump of cells/human beings life based on their lack of properties. Don’t murder the fetus and in time it will obtain those properties just like everyone else. If the mother doesn’t feel she can support the child then the ethical thing to do is give it up for adoption. "Nobody should have the right to end the clump of cells/human beings life based on their lack of properties." Nobody should have that right based on what? |
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jul 25, 2018 18:14:47 GMT
It's the same old stupid stuff. For example, the comment about being a human being at conception, as if anyone who isn't an idiot is suggesting that we're not talking about human beings at conception. Did you not hear that dopey pro-choicer call it j ust a cluster of cells”?Idiots like Goz and Lowtacks like to use that same argument on here. They are more or less just "clusters of cells". That's what were made of. You don't even seem to have a sixth grader's understanding of science. Trying to argue "we're more than just cells/chemicals/animals/etc is a philosophical debate, not a scientific one. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2018 18:24:18 GMT
Same 'ole shit... abortion will never be completely banned in the USA, not even if the GOP had the power to do so... nor should it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jul 25, 2018 18:25:03 GMT
Did you not hear that dopey pro-choicer call it j ust a cluster of cells”?Idiots like Goz and Lowtacks like to use that same argument on here. They are more or less just "clusters of cells". That's what were made of. I'm sorry you don't understand that 6th grade science class concept. Trying to argue "we're more than just cells/chemicals/animals/etc is a philosophical debate, not a scientific one. Stop stating the fucking obvious then, dumbass. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2018 18:25:51 GMT
Human beings are just clumps of cells more or less. Pro choice arguments don't involve arguing that the clumps of cells aren't human beings. The arguments have to do with properties the clumps of cells/human beings have at different points of development. A human being is a human being. Is a zygote a 'human being'? |
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jul 25, 2018 18:26:55 GMT
They are more or less just "clusters of cells". That's what were made of. I'm sorry you don't understand that 6th grade science class concept. Trying to argue "we're more than just cells/chemicals/animals/etc is a philosophical debate, not a scientific one. Stop stating the fucking obvious then, dumbass. That were just "clusters of cells"? That didn't seem very obvious to you. |
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jul 25, 2018 18:31:15 GMT
Same 'ole shit... abortion will never be completely banned in the USA, not even if the GOP had the power to do so... nor should it. Even it was, it wouldn't matter, people would just go to Canada or back alley abortion clinics. |
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Jul 25, 2018 18:47:35 GMT
Stop stating the fucking obvious then, dumbass. That were just "clusters of cells"? That didn't seem very obvious to you. Well it’s often trotted out by the likes of you and Goz as a sort of counter response to the pro-life position that the killing of a fetus is unethical. |
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Jul 25, 2018 18:53:17 GMT
That were just "clusters of cells"? That didn't seem very obvious to you. Well it’s often trotted out by the likes of you and Goz as a sort of counter response to the pro-life position that the killing of a fetus is unethical. I'm really not sure what you're getting at. "Clumps of cells" is what we are. You get upset when people spout off things that are scientifally accurate? I think I'm starting to see the problem. |
|
