|
Post by phludowin on Oct 13, 2018 17:00:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Oct 13, 2018 17:05:44 GMT
We've been through this before and in the past I've given you the benefit of the doubt as English is not your first language. But since I've told you more than once, that using "you" in that context is a general term, I can only assume you are being dishonest.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Oct 13, 2018 17:11:19 GMT
Like pregnant women who want to exercise their right to not having to carry a pregnancy to term, and are being bullied by anti-choicers in front of a clinic? Would you defend them against anti-choice scumbags? No they’re being protested against not bullied. Like here? rewire.news/article/2018/02/19/anti-choice-protesters-bullied-buttonholed-abortion-patients-new-york-clinic/They’re within their rights Protesting is legal. Physically assaulting an innocent person who shares a different opinion is not legal. Indeed, it is not. And physically assaulting an innocent person on her way to a clinic is not legal at all. Do I really have to explain this to you? As the story I posted shows: You might be the one to whom it has to be explained.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Oct 13, 2018 17:46:11 GMT
phludowin So because a woman was blocked from attending an abortion clinic by pro-lifers. That makes these two assaults by pro-choicers acceptable? Is that what you’re suggesting? Two wrongs do not make a right, idiot.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Oct 13, 2018 17:50:03 GMT
phludowin So because a woman was blocked from attending an abortion clinic by pro-lifers. That makes these two assaults by pro-choicers acceptable? Is that what you’re suggesting? Two wrongs do not make a right, idiot.
I would have broke this pathetic little snowflakes jaw if I was there when he done this.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Oct 13, 2018 17:55:21 GMT
phludowin So because a woman was blocked from attending an abortion clinic by pro-lifers. That makes these two assaults by pro-choicers acceptable? Is that what you’re suggesting? Two wrongs do not make a right, idiot. Good thing I never said it. Except maybe in jest. I know you are but what am I?
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Oct 13, 2018 18:21:04 GMT
phludowin So because a woman was blocked from attending an abortion clinic by pro-lifers. That makes these two assaults by pro-choicers acceptable? Is that what you’re suggesting? Two wrongs do not make a right, idiot.
I would have broke this pathetic little snowflakes jaw if I was there when he done this.
I’ve already explained myself. That was about defending someone weaker. If a man kicks a woman in the face right in front of you over a difference of opinion are you just going to stand there like a useless cuck and do nothing about it or are you going to step in and help the woman? And if I interfered and that deranged leftist fool attempted to get physical with me, then he’ll get his jaw broken, and deservedly so.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Oct 13, 2018 18:25:15 GMT
I would have broke this pathetic little snowflakes jaw if I was there when he done this.
I’ve already explained myself. That was about defending someone weaker. If a man kicks a woman in the face right in front of you over a difference of opinion are you just going to stand there like a useless cuck and do nothing about it or are you going to step in and help the woman? And if I interfered and that deranged leftist fool attempted to get physical with me, then he’ll get his jaw broken, and deservedly so. Ummm...no. If someone tries to hurt a woman I would protect the woman for sure but the method will be much different. I will try to get the woman out of the place as quickly as possible rather than try to break someone's jaw. Breaking someone's jaw is giving more chance for the person (or any possible friend of the man) to make matters worst. So what I will do is protect the woman and try to get both myself and her out of the place as quickly as possible.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Oct 13, 2018 18:28:47 GMT
If someone tries to hurt a woman I would protect the woman for sure but the method will be much different. I will try to get the woman out of the place as quickly as possible rather than try to break someone's jaw. Breaking someone's jaw is giving more chance for the person (or any possible friend of the man) to make matters worst. So what I will do is protect the woman and try to get both myself and her out of the place as quickly as possible. I believe the best course of action would be: Take a picture of the offender, and call the cops. Don't try to interfere in the dispute. At least that's what I hope I would do.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Oct 13, 2018 18:32:14 GMT
If someone tries to hurt a woman I would protect the woman for sure but the method will be much different. I will try to get the woman out of the place as quickly as possible rather than try to break someone's jaw. Breaking someone's jaw is giving more chance for the person (or any possible friend of the man) to make matters worst. So what I will do is protect the woman and try to get both myself and her out of the place as quickly as possible. I believe the best course of action would be: Take a picture of the offender, and call the cops. Don't try to interfere in the dispute. At least that's what I hope I would do. Yes, until any physical fight breaks that is the best course of action. Though if a man/woman starts a physical fight against a weaker person then the best action in my view is to take the physically weak person (provided he/she is not the aggressor) away from the place as quickly as one can. That's a good way of breaking already begun physical fights imo.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Oct 13, 2018 18:35:32 GMT
phludowin So because a woman was blocked from attending an abortion clinic by pro-lifers. That makes these two assaults by pro-choicers acceptable? Is that what you’re suggesting? Two wrongs do not make a right, idiot. Good thing I never said it. Except maybe in jest. I know you are but what am I? Oh so you were only joking?! Yeah, sure you were. You scolded Goz the other day for making offensive statements. And here you are saying just as ridiculous things. But Goz is Goz, most posters here know what she’s about. We’re all used to her stupidity. But what’s your excuse?
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Oct 13, 2018 18:56:09 GMT
Good thing I never said it. Except maybe in jest. I know you are but what am I? Oh so you were only joking?! Yeah, sure you were. You scolded Goz the other day for making offensive statements. And here you are saying just as ridiculous things. But Goz is Goz, most posters here know what she’s about. We’re all used to her stupidity. But what’s your excuse?
The lines above that he wrote was totally negated by what he said in last two sentences. He clearly intended to say violence cannot be a means to an end even if one is emotionally driven to think so for a little while.
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Oct 13, 2018 20:18:21 GMT
panhandling your perpetual patriarchal pronouns
through out the turn of centuries the endless hours of human needs one things more certain than disease it's a misogyny that still runs free.
sjw 10/13/18 inspired at this very moment in time by mary had a little lamb its fleece was white as snow and everywhere that mary went a misogynist would surely go.
from the 'bigot series' of poems
|
|
|
Post by goz on Oct 13, 2018 22:01:56 GMT
Oh so you were only joking?! Yeah, sure you were. You scolded Goz the other day for making offensive statements. And here you are saying just as ridiculous things. But Goz is Goz, most posters here know what she’s about. We’re all used to her stupidity. But what’s your excuse?
The lines above that he wrote was totally negated by what he said in last two sentences. He clearly intended to say violence cannot be a means to an end even if one is emotionally driven to think so for a little while.
...similarly to my intemperate words to that stupid self deleting troll that annoyed me and for which I apologised to the Board afterwards.
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Oct 13, 2018 22:26:03 GMT
...similarly to my intemperate words to that stupid self deleting troll that annoyed me and for which I apologised to the Board afterwards. You are correct, and I apologize to you for calling you out, when I'm not better. But these anti-choicers sometimes make my blood boil. I consider them to be among the lowest scum on Earth; along with SS officers, child abusers and animal molesters. But nobody is above the law; not even me. So all I can do is hope for humanity to evolve, and one day relegate anti-choice to the toxic waste dump of harmful human opinions.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Oct 13, 2018 23:04:19 GMT
...similarly to my intemperate words to that stupid self deleting troll that annoyed me and for which I apologised to the Board afterwards. You are correct, and I apologize to you for calling you out, when I'm not better. But these anti-choicers sometimes make my blood boil. I consider them to be among the lowest scum on Earth; along with SS officers, child abusers and animal molesters. But nobody is above the law; not even me. So all I can do is hope for humanity to evolve, and one day relegate anti-choice to the toxic waste dump of harmful human opinions. Apology accepted and I agree substantially about anti-choicers except that they DO truly believe their cause. I am pro-choice and not pro-abortion butt they take hypocrisy, violence and do goodering to a disgraceful new level in thinking that their own 'opinion' is better and more valid than others. Frankly it is none of their business and they should 'butt' out.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Oct 13, 2018 23:27:07 GMT
...similarly to my intemperate words to that stupid self deleting troll that annoyed me and for which I apologised to the Board afterwards. You are correct, and I apologize to you for calling you out, when I'm not better. But these anti-choicers sometimes make my blood boil. I consider them to be among the lowest scum on Earth; along with SS officers, child abusers and animal molesters. But nobody is above the law; not even me. So all I can do is hope for humanity to evolve, and one day relegate anti-choice to the toxic waste dump of harmful human opinions. Did you really just equate people who are essentially just against infanticide with genocidal maniacs and child and animal abusers? What the hell is wrong with you? Are you and Goz in a competition over who can make the most stupid outlandish and repulsive comment?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Oct 14, 2018 0:05:52 GMT
You are correct, and I apologize to you for calling you out, when I'm not better. But these anti-choicers sometimes make my blood boil. I consider them to be among the lowest scum on Earth; along with SS officers, child abusers and animal molesters. But nobody is above the law; not even me. So all I can do is hope for humanity to evolve, and one day relegate anti-choice to the toxic waste dump of harmful human opinions. Did you really just compare people who are basically just against infanticide with genocidal maniacs and child and animal abusers? What the hell is wrong with you? Are you and Goz in a competition over who can make the most stupid outlandish and repulsive comment? Thank you kind Cody for facilitating phludowin and my 'kiss and makeup'! BTW abortion is not and cannot be infanticide. Infants are born. You're welcome. You da man!
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Oct 17, 2018 20:07:17 GMT
Just read an article in German feminist magazine EMMA, about the choice of abortion, and decided to bump this thread. The beginning of the article can be found here: www.emma.de/artikel/abtreibung-336025It's in German; it describes the difficulties doctors have to make the fact known that they perform abortions. Anti-choicers really are scum. Interesting fact: The laws in Germany prohibiting abortion are from the Nazi time. So in my opinion comparing anti-choicers to SS officers is accurate and appropriate.
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on Oct 17, 2018 20:53:42 GMT
Just read an article in German feminist magazine EMMA, about the choice of abortion, and decided to bump this thread. The beginning of the article can be found here: www.emma.de/artikel/abtreibung-336025It's in German; it describes the difficulties doctors have to make the fact known that they perform abortions. Anti-choicers really are scum. Interesting fact: The laws in Germany prohibiting abortion are from the Nazi time. So in my opinion comparing anti-choicers to SS officers is accurate and appropriate. My goodness. You really are shameless aren’t you? You’re a no less deranged lefty than the “pro-choicer” in the video.
|
|