|
Post by ck100 on Nov 17, 2018 8:32:33 GMT
A lot of people are saying it's solid and emotional, if predictable, sequel. Critics Consensus: Creed II's adherence to franchise formula adds up to a sequel with few true surprises, but its time-tested generational themes still pack a solid punch. www.rottentomatoes.com/m/creed_ii But in fairness though, by now you should know what you're getting with a Rocky/Creed film. It's kind of the same thing with Mission: Impossible and its sequels, Fast & Furious with its sequels, Transformers with its sequels, etc. You're not going to see many franchises really reinvent the wheel much. There will always be an ounce of predictability. Any of you planning on seeing Creed II?
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Nov 18, 2018 5:56:04 GMT
kind of average, hope critics not grading on curve , and this is an honest score
TOMATOMETER 73% Average Rating: 7/10 Reviews Counted: 33 Fresh: 24 Rotten: 9
Critics Consensus: Creed II's adherence to franchise formula adds up to a sequel with few true surprises, but its time-tested generational themes still pack a solid punch.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 19, 2018 9:35:06 GMT
Well, i will see it for sure
|
|
|
Post by moviemanjackson on Nov 24, 2018 4:10:38 GMT
Really enjoyed this. Not as strong as Creed, and the dialogue at times feels a little more clunkier (for some reason, i keep on thinking about the scene where Adonis is outside of the LA gym in his mustang contemplating going back and Tony and him are just...talking about coming in, felt awkward).
But, the fight scenes are good. Lack the fluidity of the last movie but do carry a "Fight Night" type of feel. And, I like the inversion of the theme from Creed. In Creed, Donny's fighting for himself, and Rock even says as much (...you're not doing this for me, not for your father, but you). That was powerful, but it isn't something that can last. In this one, Donny does still fight for himself, but, he is fighting more for others, which seemed to be a driving theme of the movie. Found it interesting.
Great tracks too, been playing the Vince Staples one consistently. Nothing as hot as "If I Fight, You Fight" but precise work from Ludwig again.
I'd obv watch another, but, I definitely wouldn't mind them ending here. Just about everything is wrapped perfectly, even his revenge on Danny Stuntman Wheeler lol!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2018 15:51:36 GMT
I thought it was pretty damn good . A little soap operish at times (but you'll have that with Rocky films) and as moviemanjackson pointed out the dialogue is clunky in some parts but no biggie. You care about the characters and its an entertaining film all around.
I esp liked learning about what happened to Ivan Drago and thought the whole father/son dynamic was well done. Oh and the montages were on point! You gotta have on point montages if you want to make a good Rocky/Creed film ! haha
Would recommend seeing this to anyone that enjoyed the 1st Creed. I thought the 1st one was better but the sequel still has enough entertaining moments thru out . solid 7.5/10
On a side note, my theater was damn near sold out . If that is any indication, this film is gonna make serious bank at the box office.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Nov 29, 2018 15:28:03 GMT
I thought it was pretty damn good . A little soap operish at times (but you'll have that with Rocky films) and as moviemanjackson pointed out the dialogue is clunky in some parts but no biggie. You care about the characters and its an entertaining film all around. I esp liked learning about what happened to Ivan Drago and thought the whole father/son dynamic was well done. Oh and the montages were on point! You gotta have on point montages if you want to make a good Rocky/Creed film ! haha Would recommend seeing this to anyone that enjoyed the 1st Creed. I thought the 1st one was better but the sequel still has enough entertaining moments thru out . solid 7.5/10 On a side note, my theater was damn near sold out . If that is any indication, this film is gonna make serious bank at the box office. I feel like if Creed is Rocky 1, than this one is Rocky 2. Not as good as the original, but solid and enjoyable
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Nov 29, 2018 21:36:43 GMT
ill see it after i've seen other stuff as well.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Dec 2, 2018 1:53:39 GMT
Any of you planning on seeing Creed II? Saw it, loved it. Still carries a lot of punch (have fun with the pun). This one has an extra added element that wasn't as highlighted in the previous installments, which is the aspect of the relationships between father and sons. This was used to quite the dramatic effect with the Drago characters in particular. Very good movie.
And though Stallone says he's done, I think there's at least one more of these to be made. But I'll keep my story ideas to myself...
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Dec 2, 2018 2:00:20 GMT
Any of you planning on seeing Creed II? Saw it, loved it. Still carries a lot of punch (have fun with the pun). This one has an extra added element that wasn't as highlighted in the previous installments, which is the aspect of the relationships between father and sons. This was used to quite the dramatic effect with the Drago characters in particular. Very good movie.
And though Stallone says he's done, I think there's at least one more of these to be made. But I'll keep my story ideas to myself...
I wonder if they'll bring in Clubber Lang Jr. or Tommy Gunn Jr. for "Creed III".
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Dec 2, 2018 2:12:11 GMT
Saw it, loved it. Still carries a lot of punch (have fun with the pun). This one has an extra added element that wasn't as highlighted in the previous installments, which is the aspect of the relationships between father and sons. This was used to quite the dramatic effect with the Drago characters in particular. Very good movie.
And though Stallone says he's done, I think there's at least one more of these to be made. But I'll keep my story ideas to myself...
I wonder if they'll bring in Clubber Lang Jr. or Tommy Gunn Jr. for "Creed III". Hah! No, I think that would be the height of camp. But I still think there is one more chapter in the relationship between Creed and Rocky.
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Dec 2, 2018 2:16:46 GMT
I wonder if they'll bring in Clubber Lang Jr. or Tommy Gunn Jr. for "Creed III". Hah! No, I think that would be the height of camp. But I still think there is one more chapter in the relationship between Creed and Rocky. Well that can't happen with Stallone retiring from playing Rocky. I mean assuming he sticks with his retirement plan.
|
|
|
Post by joekiddlouischama on Feb 12, 2019 9:12:46 GMT
Haven't seen the first. Saw this one last night thinking it might be cool with the Drago subplot and found it to be a middling, overlong, manipulating, cliché ridden and superficial bore. It was also marred by average to weak acting and an attempt at pathos, just denigrated into bathos. It was phony and for me, the film just sat there and made no emotional connection whatsoever.The film should have been shorn of about 20mins for a start and it was un-exciting and overdone. Rocky IV - 85' clocked in at 90mins, got straight to the point and had an awesome fight climax that this insipid tripe could only dream of aspiring too. I concur, and the only reason why I feel that Creed II even reaches mediocrity is the quality of its cinematography, with some commendable compositions and impressive backlighting. But the narrative and dialogue are clichéd, contrived, and predictable. Aside from Sylvester Stallone, the actors give the impression that they are going through the motions, that they cannot improve upon the banalities of the script and that the director (Steven Caple Jr., a novice) provided little inspiration. And I did not find the fight scenes especially impressive—they lacked the verve of, say, Million Dollar Baby (Clint Eastwood, 2004) or Southpaw (Antoine Fuqua, 2015) or even the more self-consciously artistic Raging Bull (Martin Scorsese, 1980). As you indicate, Creed II is bloated, in addition to being about as predictable as a boxing movie could possibly be. I only viewed it because I enjoyed the original Creed from three years earlier—that movie is "good," an emotionally honest and less sentimental film about different people dreaming, connecting, and finding their way through struggles. Creed II, conversely, epitomizes the reasons why Hollywood sequels tend to disappoint: they become both overly spectacular and more maudlin. And the fact that the original's director, Ryan Coogler, did not direct this one—he served as an executive producer yet did not direct—clearly did not help. In my view, what Creed II needed was more of a sustained focus on the nominal villains—the father-and-son Dragos. They receive some attention, but not enough to cultivate character and create empathy. The film required greater balance; without it, it became a perfunctory melodrama to simply serve the interests of the protagonist. And the rap song that plays over the closing credits (and which briefly appears earlier in the movie), "Kill 'Em With Success," suggests the film's lack of wit and creativity.
|
|
|
Post by joekiddlouischama on Feb 12, 2019 9:21:21 GMT
Any of you planning on seeing Creed II? Saw it, loved it. Still carries a lot of punch (have fun with the pun). This one has an extra added element that wasn't as highlighted in the previous installments, which is the aspect of the relationships between father and sons. This was used to quite the dramatic effect with the Drago characters in particular. Very good movie.
And though Stallone says he's done, I think there's at least one more of these to be made. But I'll keep my story ideas to myself...
In the end, though, I feel that Creed II used that angle in a tokenistic manner with regard to the Dragos; I would have liked to have seen those characters and their relationship treated more humanistically instead. The idea is worthwhile, but in my view, it needed much better writing and direction in order to serve as something more than 'sequel fodder.' We especially needed to see the son, Viktor Drago, as something more than a pushed-and-prodded behemoth, the proverbial Goliath who existed to be cut down.
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Feb 12, 2019 18:46:07 GMT
Saw it, loved it. Still carries a lot of punch (have fun with the pun). This one has an extra added element that wasn't as highlighted in the previous installments, which is the aspect of the relationships between father and sons. This was used to quite the dramatic effect with the Drago characters in particular. Very good movie.
And though Stallone says he's done, I think there's at least one more of these to be made. But I'll keep my story ideas to myself...
In the end, though, I feel that Creed II used that angle in a tokenistic manner with regard to the Dragos; I would have liked to have seen those characters and their relationship treated more humanistically instead. The idea is worthwhile, but in my view, it needed much better writing and direction in order to serve as something more than 'sequel fodder.' We especially needed to see the son, Viktor Drago, as something more than a pushed-and-prodded behemoth, the proverbial Goliath who existed to be cut down. You might be right my friend. But at least Drago was more human in this than he was in Rocky 4. I remember thinking he was nothing more than a Frankensteins monster in that movie. In this he actually shows pain and ambition and ultimately love. Even the son shows emotion. The scene where Briggitte Nielsen shows up is powerful.
|
|
|
Post by moviemanjackson on Feb 16, 2019 4:35:19 GMT
In the end, though, I feel that Creed II used that angle in a tokenistic manner with regard to the Dragos; I would have liked to have seen those characters and their relationship treated more humanistically instead. The idea is worthwhile, but in my view, it needed much better writing and direction in order to serve as something more than 'sequel fodder.' We especially needed to see the son, Viktor Drago, as something more than a pushed-and-prodded behemoth, the proverbial Goliath who existed to be cut down. You might be right my friend. But at least Drago was more human in this than he was in Rocky 4. I remember thinking he was nothing more than a Frankensteins monster in that movie. In this he actually shows pain and ambition and ultimately love. Even the son shows emotion. The scene where Briggitte Nielsen shows up is powerful. He existed as pretty much a meme in Rocky IV. Was so surprised that they really made him a character who had been through and suffered a lot. I've seen the argument made that the Dragos are the protagonists and the Balboa/Creed characters are the "antagonists."
|
|
|
Post by joekiddlouischama on Feb 19, 2019 10:53:22 GMT
You might be right my friend. But at least Drago was more human in this than he was in Rocky 4. I remember thinking he was nothing more than a Frankensteins monster in that movie. In this he actually shows pain and ambition and ultimately love. Even the son shows emotion. The scene where Briggitte Nielsen shows up is powerful. He existed as pretty much a meme in Rocky IV. Was so surprised that they really made him a character who had been through and suffered a lot. I've seen the argument made that the Dragos are the protagonists and the Balboa/Creed characters are the "antagonists."I wish that the movie offered greater balance and coverage of the Dragos, to the point where that argument would be plausible (to me, it is not). Creed II humanizes the original Drago decently, but the son needs more humanization (although he is certainly not as cartoonish as Drago in Rocky IV). And overall, I feel that the duo needed more coverage in general, a decision that could have also reduced the script's banalities regarding Creed. I do take the point about the improvement over Rocky IV in this regard, but I would offer a reminder about the cartoonish extent that action movies—such as Rocky IV and some of Stallone's other action pictures, like Rambo: First Blood Part II—reached during the 1980s, especially with regard to foreign villains, whether they were Russian or Vietnamese or whomever. If a non-CGI action movie from the globalized 2010s fails to offer an improvement in this area, then it is probably a failure as a film.
|
|