NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Dec 17, 2018 12:54:54 GMT
"To positively confirm your ID I'll have to dox your URL and IT data. All this would of course be a lot more fun if you are not just a random idiot, but some of the regulars trolling."
Would you say that the person who wrote this was threatening to doxx someone?  |
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Dec 17, 2018 18:06:15 GMT
Any opinions accompanying a vote would be appreciated.  The key wording for me is the "I'll have to" part. It doesn't say "I would have to."  There is a big difference. |
|
|
|
Post by No Morpho, Only Bánh mì on Dec 17, 2018 19:28:16 GMT
Oof! Def threatening. Was this directed at you? I hope it wasn’t Clinton.  |
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Dec 17, 2018 19:40:23 GMT
Oof! Def threatening. Was this directed at you? I hope it wasn’t Clinton. No, definitely not Clinton.
Would you say that if the person who wrote this was right at the front of the queue, brandishing his pitchfork, when certain posters were banned for doxxing, then he would be ever so slightly hypocritical? |
|
|
|
Post by No Morpho, Only Bánh mì on Dec 17, 2018 19:48:36 GMT
Oof! Def threatening. Was this directed at you? I hope it wasn’t Clinton. No, definitely not Clinton.
Would you say that if the person who wrote this was right at the front of the queue, brandishing his pitchfork, when certain posters were banned for doxxing, then he would be ever so slightly hypocritical?  |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Dec 17, 2018 20:17:53 GMT
 hell hath no fury like a fanboy scorned, something must really be threatening to you when you get so petty and rummage so deeply through old posting histories. Hey, why not expose the full context of that heinous exchange and make this a real call-out thread? Hypocritical much? Btw, I'm sure a perp savvy enough to misspell "dox"-ing and misunderstanding the meaning of the term (which is about revealing the identity of a poster to the public, not tracing identity?) must be on the FBI most wanted list? #WhodunitNorman   |
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Dec 17, 2018 21:14:38 GMT
hell hath no fury like a fanboy scorned, something must really be threatening to you when you get so petty and rummage so deeply through old posting histories. Hey, why not expose the full context of that heinous exchange and make this a real call-out thread? Hypocritical much? Btw, I'm sure a perp savvy enough to misspell "dox"-ing and misunderstanding the meaning of the term (which is about revealing the identity of a poster to the public, not tracing identity?) must be on the FBI most wanted list? #WhodunitNorman I'm not one for breaking the rules, bro. Wouldn't you say whoever it is sounds like a hypocrite though? |
|
|
|
Post by No Morpho, Only Bánh mì on Dec 17, 2018 21:35:23 GMT
I found it! From the eattheeloi days, ja? Dude, anyone who reads my previous responses to your mentally ill ravings can make their own mind up about which of us looked like an idiot. Typing what you would like to be true won't make any difference to that. I understand that these message boards are your life and the knowledge that other people might have something better to do with their time, doesn't occupy space within the limited confines of your diseased mind. So I feel I should warn you that the next time I get bored (probably some time within the next 7 days), I am unlikely to post again for another few months. Please don't take it to heart. It really has nothing to do with you.  PS. So you are now finally admitting you were wrong and that I am not ArArArchStanton? Jeez, did you badly own yourself or what??! awww, cupcake, again only longwinded deflections without addressing the source of your escalated butt sore. But at least you finally faced me when provoked, and thus proved a point to me. If you must know, some forced and sudden exchanges between Archy and you rather hardened my suspicion, but in the end this is of lesser relevance. To positively confirm your ID I'll have to dox your URL and IT data. All this would of course be a lot more fun if you are not just a random idiot, but some of the regulars trolling. But in the end this is only about making fun of you. A butthurt fanboy whose only contribution on forums is desperate, unimaginative trolling when getting some grain of salt in his vagina about beefcake-in-tights movies for kids. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Dec 17, 2018 22:00:29 GMT
hell hath no fury like a fanboy scorned, something must really be threatening to you when you get so petty and rummage so deeply through old posting histories. Hey, why not expose the full context of that heinous exchange and make this a real call-out thread? Hypocritical much? Btw, I'm sure a perp savvy enough to misspell "dox"-ing and misunderstanding the meaning of the term (which is about revealing the identity of a poster to the public, not tracing identity?) must be on the FBI most wanted list? #WhodunitNorman I'm not one for breaking the rules, bro. there defiance turned into compliance, where's that old trolling spirit? hard to assess out of context - with all your charms you were never one for nuance, Norm. Did this vile knavery go on with " Once I hack you I will dox(x) everybody your real name. Then we can harass you and take the pictures of your dead relatives as avatar trophy so to make you feel bad, all in revenge for badmouthing our favorite comic book movies, muahahah"...? If so, this foul apple must be plucked moderately. I have sharpened my best pitchfork so to go on this last crusade with you. But you must call him out. Or they win, mate. Don't let Aquaman win. That would be hypocritical! Call him out or it's check mate. I call it check mate. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Dec 17, 2018 22:11:42 GMT
I found it! From the eattheeloi days, ja? awww, cupcake, again only longwinded deflections without addressing the source of your escalated butt sore. But at least you finally faced me when provoked, and thus proved a point to me. If you must know, some forced and sudden exchanges between Archy and you rather hardened my suspicion, but in the end this is of lesser relevance. To positively confirm your ID I'll have to dox your URL and IT data. All this would of course be a lot more fun if you are not just a random idiot, but some of the regulars trolling. But in the end this is only about making fun of you. A butthurt fanboy whose only contribution on forums is desperate, unimaginative trolling when getting some grain of salt in his vagina about beefcake-in-tights movies for kids. MOI?  Eat THIS, Eloi. Dox you later. |
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Dec 17, 2018 22:33:17 GMT
I'm not one for breaking the rules, bro. there defiance turned into compliance, where's that old trolling spirit? hard to assess out of context - with all your charms you were never one for nuance, Norm. Did this vile knavery go on with " Once I hack you I will dox(x) everybody your real name. Then we can harass you and take the pictures of your dead relatives as avatar trophy so to make you feel bad, all in revenge for badmouthing our favorite comic book movies, muahahah"...? If so, this foul apple must be plucked moderately. I have sharpened my best pitchfork so to go on this last crusade with you. But you must call him out. Or they win, mate. Don't let Aquaman win. That would be hypocritical! Call him out or it's check mate. I call it check mate. I never suggested you had either the intention or the wherewithal do carry out your threat, but it was a threat all the same. A threat to do something which you were later to spend endless posts castigating others for. It appears as though there is nothing you don't have double standards with. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Dec 17, 2018 22:56:01 GMT
there defiance turned into compliance, where's that old trolling spirit? hard to assess out of context - with all your charms you were never one for nuance, Norm. Did this vile knavery go on with " Once I hack you I will dox(x) everybody your real name. Then we can harass you and take the pictures of your dead relatives as avatar trophy so to make you feel bad, all in revenge for badmouthing our favorite comic book movies, muahahah"...? If so, this foul apple must be plucked moderately. I have sharpened my best pitchfork so to go on this last crusade with you. But you must call him out. Or they win, mate. Don't let Aquaman win. That would be hypocritical! Call him out or it's check mate. I call it check mate. I never suggested you had either the intention or the wherewithal do carry out your threat, but it was a threat all the same. A threat to do something which you were later to spend endless posts castigating others for. It appears as though there is nothing you don't have double standards with. ^ false equivalency. In a heated exchange I mockingly "threatened" to find out if you are ArchStanton via your URL, but not to disclose your identity to the public. That is the same to you as actually doxxing, harassing and using pictures of dead relatives as avatars for revenge? Only to you. And yes, I would still spend "endless posts castigating" others for the latter. Now all the more after the fact. |
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Dec 17, 2018 23:14:41 GMT
I never suggested you had either the intention or the wherewithal do carry out your threat, but it was a threat all the same. A threat to do something which you were later to spend endless posts castigating others for. It appears as though there is nothing you don't have double standards with. ^ false equivalency. In a heated exchange I mockingly "threatened" to find out if you are ArchStanton via your URL, but not to disclose your identity to the public. That is the same to you as actually doxxing, harassing and using pictures of dead relatives as avatars for revenge? Only to you. And yes, I would still spend "endless posts castigating" others for the latter. Now all the more after the fact. "Mockingly."
"....but not to disclose your identity to the public."
It's easy to ascribe different tones and meanings in retrospect, huh? |
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Dec 18, 2018 3:43:00 GMT
As someone so eloquently put it, don’t act like you have a grain of salt in your vagina over beefcake-in-tights movies for kids. You threatened to “dox” someone, which means precisely that. Where are we with the excuses at this point? Ignorance ... Just kidding ... The other guy made me real mad ... I didn’t mean doxing like doxing. I meant the other kind of doxing, where you don’t really dox someone .... You’re a poopoo head for finding that .... Look! Squirrel! |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Dec 18, 2018 14:25:08 GMT
^ false equivalency. In a heated exchange I mockingly "threatened" to find out if you are ArchStanton via your URL, but not to disclose your identity to the public. That is the same to you as actually doxxing, harassing and using pictures of dead relatives as avatars for revenge? Only to you. And yes, I would still spend "endless posts castigating" others for the latter. Now all the more after the fact. "Mockingly."
"....but not to disclose your identity to the public."
It's easy to ascribe different tones and meanings in retrospect, huh? "Mockingly" as in my "But in the end this is only about making fun of you." quite blatantly suggests, true then true now. What was your point again here Norman, hypocricy? You'are very good at it by not being "one for breaking the rules" but still making call out threads. That warrants a special hypocricy award.
That aside, apart from your false equivalency, I wonder what's your moral position here? That if you say sth imroper you forfeit the right to speak out against it later? Like when you say "I kill you" you are not entitled to be outraged if someone's actually rapes and killes a person.
Anyways, happy I am still able to get under your skin unintended. 
|
|
|
|
Post by No Morpho, Only Bánh mì on Dec 18, 2018 14:30:00 GMT
"Mockingly."
"....but not to disclose your identity to the public."
It's easy to ascribe different tones and meanings in retrospect, huh? "Mockingly" as in my "But in the end this is only about making fun of you." quite blatantly suggests, true then true now. What was your point again here Norman, hypocricy? You'are very good at it by not being "one for breaking the rules" but still making call out threads. That warrants a special hypocricy award.
That aside, apart from your false equivalency, I wonder what's your moral position here? That if you say sth imroper you forfeit the right to speak out against it later? Like when you say "I kill you" you are not entitled to be outraged if someone's actually rapes and killes a person.
Anyways, happy I am still able to get under your skin unintended.
And with no extra work. It’s like a long term investment paying off down the road! |
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Dec 18, 2018 19:46:27 GMT
"Mockingly."
"....but not to disclose your identity to the public."
It's easy to ascribe different tones and meanings in retrospect, huh? "Mockingly" as in my "But in the end this is only about making fun of you." quite blatantly suggests, true then true now. What was your point again here Norman, hypocricy? You'are very good at it by not being "one for breaking the rules" but still making call out threads. That warrants a special hypocricy award.
That aside, apart from your false equivalency, I wonder what's your moral position here? That if you say sth imroper you forfeit the right to speak out against it later? Like when you say "I kill you" you are not entitled to be outraged if someone's actually rapes and killes a person.
Anyways, happy I am still able to get under your skin unintended.
I don't think you thought that one through very well, bro. How does it make me a hypocrite if I don't agree with the rule I am circumventing? You really are grasping at straws there, dude.
As far as your 2nd point goes, do you ever think it's right to say you intend to kill someone?
I had forgotten all about the other thread. I only unearthed it when I was looking for examples of you supporting the sort of bullshit DC fan logic you complained about me using to make a point (which I found ). I decided that this was the more entertaining of the two double standards. Although I'm sure you won't let the truth get in the way of your continued self-aggrandizement.
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Dec 18, 2018 20:02:32 GMT
"Mockingly" as in my "But in the end this is only about making fun of you." quite blatantly suggests, true then true now. What was your point again here Norman, hypocricy? You'are very good at it by not being "one for breaking the rules" but still making call out threads. That warrants a special hypocricy award.
That aside, apart from your false equivalency, I wonder what's your moral position here? That if you say sth imroper you forfeit the right to speak out against it later? Like when you say "I kill you" you are not entitled to be outraged if someone's actually rapes and killes a person.
Anyways, happy I am still able to get under your skin unintended.
And with no extra work. It’s like a long term investment paying off down the road! I'm not sure if you think you are being like message board Clint Eastwood in A Fistful of Dollars or something but you are being much more transparent than that. |
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Dec 18, 2018 20:21:10 GMT
"Mockingly" as in my "But in the end this is only about making fun of you." quite blatantly suggests, true then true now. What was your point again here Norman, hypocricy? You'are very good at it by not being "one for breaking the rules" but still making call out threads. That warrants a special hypocricy award.
That aside, apart from your false equivalency, I wonder what's your moral position here? That if you say sth imroper you forfeit the right to speak out against it later? Like when you say "I kill you" you are not entitled to be outraged if someone's actually rapes and killes a person.
Anyways, happy I am still able to get under your skin unintended.
I don't think you thought that one through very well, bro. How does it make me a hypocrite if I don't agree with the rule I am circumventing? You really are grasping at straws there, dude.
I call it the eattheNorm double standard fallacy Have you ever not dodged a question by responding with a pointless question... Weird how much time and effort you put into me, hope you will one day find some real-life person you care enough for to stalk. Well, you definitely love your eattheNorm double standard fallacies.  |
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Dec 18, 2018 20:33:21 GMT
I don't think you thought that one through very well, bro. How does it make me a hypocrite if I don't agree with the rule I am circumventing? You really are grasping at straws there, dude.
I call it the eattheNorm double standard fallacy Have you ever not dodged a question by responding with a pointless question... Weird how much time and effort you put into me, hope you will one day find some real-life person you care enough for to stalk. Well, you definitely love your eattheNorm double standard fallacies. I call it the eattheNorm double standard fallacy
Call it what you like, it shot a hole right through your stupid argument.
Have you ever not dodged a question by responding with a pointless question...
Do you need me to reword it for you? Surely it isn't that difficult for you to understand? - I don't think it is right for anyone to say they intend to kill someone. Do you agree with that?
Weird how much time and effort you put into me, hope you will one day find some real-life person you care enough for to stalk.
Dude, I operate under an equal opportunities necro policy. Anyone with double standards is free to apply.
|
|
