|
Post by kls on Feb 17, 2019 12:34:34 GMT
I wouldn't even know how to answer that besides saying if one believes in the Judeo-Christian God that's what His main admonishments are according to the Bible. If one doesn't believe it wouldn't be relevant to him or her. But if one has a belief in a religion, how can they not defend their God with solid factual evidence of it being HIS law, if it is what God decrees and they are its followers to believe?
None of it is really God's law, because the religious God would then have to be defined and proven to be real and tangible. Or perhaps the bottom line is, the commandments—since you brought them into the scenario—are just man made laws disguised as God's laws, to control and fool a bunch of superstitious nitwits from eons ago who were ignorant. It wasn't their fault then, because they didn't know of science, but sadly, this still happens today for many.
These laws of religion are very relevant, belief or not, because the influence of religion and its God\s, have seeped into the mindset of civilization today and even secular law is based on what religion preached and creates a large part of our current sociology. I don't need to prove or defend anything. One can believe or not believe. I'm not telling anyone they are right or wrong. You are going way beyond what I am saying.
|
|
|
Post by kls on Feb 17, 2019 12:36:19 GMT
3 likes so far for my post kls , the one you appeared to not get the context of. That's nice for you.
|
|
|
Post by Roberto on Feb 17, 2019 12:38:45 GMT
Oh god. Isn't one Slovak enough? Now he's got his sister posting here too?
|
|
|
Post by kls on Feb 17, 2019 12:40:34 GMT
I know!
How is it for you?
Fine, thank you.
|
|
|
Post by ghostintheshell on Feb 17, 2019 17:43:05 GMT
Let's face it, none of us would ever buy a car without taking it for a test drive first. But...people aren't cars???
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Feb 17, 2019 17:45:40 GMT
I didn't know my thread would cause such heated discussions/debates.
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Feb 17, 2019 19:41:30 GMT
I have no issue with pre-marital sex, but if someone prefers to wait that's their choice.
|
|
|
Post by them1ghtyhumph on Feb 18, 2019 4:55:23 GMT
Pre-marital sex. We are humans, so we are animals.
We are programmed to fuck.
If you don't want your children not to have pre-marital sex, don't have kids.
Get a vasectomy. Women, have your tubes tied.
If you don't think we are animals, why do you think we have parental instincts.
I did not read one other post in this thread
|
|
|
Post by The Grand Inquisitor on Feb 18, 2019 5:04:54 GMT
Isn't that an overly personal question about a private decision?
|
|
|
Post by deembastille on Feb 18, 2019 5:06:58 GMT
It's really simple... God forbids it prior to legitimate marriage. but since people are people, they tend to largely ignore it nowadays. 🙄 Not everyone believes in your God.
|
|
|
Post by deembastille on Feb 18, 2019 5:11:14 GMT
It's really simple... God forbids it prior to legitimate marriage. but since people are people, they tend to largely ignore it nowadays. God does not forbid it. It makes no reasonable sense to forbid it and that is why people are people and ignore it, because God's law is baloney. That is correct. I'm fact, God is okay with sex but in His eyes you are now married to the person you are bumping uglies with.
|
|
|
Post by deembastille on Feb 18, 2019 5:14:54 GMT
k, I am not religious, I think you know that. I often question comments made by posters who use God's law as sounding board, when it is ultimately hollow and has no basis for a reasonable point or argument. From my understanding, you are Christian\Catholic, so I made an assumption that you are\were in defense of God's law on pre-marital sex. Isn't that what being religious is, following your God's law and endorsing and\or enforcing it?
So what is God's law on premarital sex? Maybe we're thinking of different things because I'm thinking of the commandments. So the eleventh commandment is thou shalt not bump uglies with someone you are not married to?
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Feb 18, 2019 5:27:31 GMT
I have no issue with pre-marital sex, but if someone prefers to wait that's their choice. Assuming that marriage is on the cards, so pre-marital sex is pretty much a misnomer and doesn't and has never existed as a logical entity. I'm agnostic. Like I said, I have no issue with people having sex before marriage or with people they have no intention of marrying. However I also think if someone chooses to wait until they are married, if they're planning on marrying for personal or religious reasons, that's their decision and because it doesn't affect me directly I don't have a problem with that either.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2019 6:32:19 GMT
I think it is up to the person and other people shouldn't judge them for their choice whether they choose to have sex with multiple partners or wait until they are with the right. I had sex with a lot of my male friends when I was younger and while I wouldn't go back to sleeping with guys now if I were single 'cause I am a Lesbian I don't regret it and it was fun but there are double standards when it comes to us having casual sex and even in 2019 many people still slut shame and vilify us and when we so much as talk about sex or make sex jokes the very same guys who are always talking about sex turn into a bunch of prudish hypocrites who attack us over it 'cause they believe sex is something that should only be enjoyed by males and are threatened by our sexuality. It is things like that which make me proud to be a Lesbian 'cause I don't have to put up with their double standards and male chauvinistic shit.
|
|
|
Post by WarrenPeace on Feb 18, 2019 10:36:18 GMT
I take part in sex but I wouldn't call it pre marital since neither one of us wants to get married.
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Feb 18, 2019 11:09:04 GMT
I'm agnostic. Like I said, I have no issue with people having sex before marriage or with people they have no intention of marrying. However I also think if someone chooses to wait until they are married, if they're planning on marrying for personal or religious reasons, that's their decision and because it doesn't affect me directly I don't have a problem with that either. Exactly! It doesn't affect us and it certainly has nothing to do with God. The whole notion of "pre-marital" sex and whatever it is supposed to represent or mean, is a load of bunkum. If they are wanting to wait until they get married, then it is still not pre-marital sex, because they are refraining from it. It is just sex at any phase of ones life and marriage has frick all to do with the notion of sex. Is there a particular part of what I'm saying you're objecting to? Some people, who may be religious (or not), may choose to get married and may also choose not to have sex before they get married (that is not have "pre-marital sex", it's just a convenient term). I'm just saying I'm fine with this if this is the choice they make for themselves and don't see why it should upset anyone else either.
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Feb 18, 2019 12:08:05 GMT
Is there a particular part of what I'm saying you're objecting to? Some people, who may be religious (or not), may choose to get married and may also choose not to have sex before they get married (that is not have "pre-marital sex", it's just a convenient term). I'm just saying I'm fine with this if this is the choice they make for themselves and don't see why it should upset anyone else either. No, I have agreed with you and just expanded on what you have said with my take on what the bogus meaning behind what "pre-marital sex" is supposed to represent. I even started my post with exactly, so not sure how that got misinterpreted. OK, cool.
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Feb 18, 2019 12:27:11 GMT
It makes very little difference in the dating world but nearly everyone is going to do it anyway.
|
|
|
Post by deembastille on Feb 18, 2019 15:02:54 GMT
So the eleventh commandment is thou shalt not bump uglies with someone you are not married to? I know! Absurd point aint' it! Of course it is! She might be confusing this with thou shalt not commit adultery which is along the lines of coveting your neighbors wife and bumping uglies. Now all those overly religious people out there still don't understand the relationship sex has with the priest abuse. The old fogie Church has yet to accept the fact that we are animals and that is the reason how allthese deviants gwginto the church.
|
|
|
Post by kls on Feb 18, 2019 15:06:51 GMT
I know! Absurd point aint' it! Of course it is! She might be confusing this with thou shalt not commit adultery which is along the lines of coveting your neighbors wife and bumping uglies. Now all those overly religious people out there still don't understand the relationship sex has with the priest abuse. The old fogie Church has yet to accept the fact that we are animals and that is the reason how allthese deviants gwginto the church. Who is she who is confusing something with thou shalt not commit adultery?
|
|