|
|
Post by Winter_King on Apr 10, 2019 12:58:38 GMT
Looks good
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 10, 2019 13:34:46 GMT
Wow. The cgi looks astonishing.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Social Introvert on Apr 10, 2019 13:40:34 GMT
Those effects look incredible, though it does seem to be a shot-for-shot remake - what's the point?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2019 0:34:38 GMT
Impressive cgi but just like Beauty and the Beast this will be an uninspiring remake. Pass
|
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Apr 11, 2019 1:41:06 GMT
i have zero interest in this like most Disney remakes
|
|
egon1982
Sophomore
@egon1982
Posts: 994
Likes: 268
|
Post by egon1982 on Apr 11, 2019 2:48:47 GMT
Impressive cgi but just like Beauty and the Beast this will be an uninspiring remake. Pass I have yet to see these half-assed live action remakes of Disney classics, sometimes you can't strike lightning twice and i'm banning Disney's furry ass htis year.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Apr 15, 2019 0:21:53 GMT
I've no issue with a photo-realistic adaptation of the story and the imagery looks wonderful in this trailer.
|
|
|
|
Post by gljbradley on Apr 16, 2019 0:27:16 GMT
Impressive cgi but just like Beauty and the Beast this will be an uninspiring remake. Pass I have yet to see these half-assed live action remakes of Disney classics, sometimes you can't strike lightning twice and i'm banning Disney's furry ass htis year. You and me both. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 16, 2019 0:38:06 GMT
I've no issue with a photo-realistic adaptation of the story and the imagery looks wonderful in this trailer. Same. Sue me.
|
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Apr 17, 2019 14:52:44 GMT
It looks great. So far Disney's live action remakes have mostly been very good.
Beauty and the Beast, The Jungle Book, and Cinderella were all very good.
Maleficent was just ok IMO
Alice in Wonderland (2010) was more of a sequel than a remake but it was good. The sequel to this film was not good IMO.
I also don't believe that this will be a shot for shot remake. I'm sure they will add some new scenes and probably a new song or 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 19, 2019 17:00:46 GMT
Favreau came out and said it won't be a shot-for-shot remake. We'll see. Except Egon.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2019 0:33:27 GMT
I think this looks great. Cinderella is my current favorite of the remakes, but this may dethrone it for first place.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 20, 2019 1:26:20 GMT
I think this looks great. Cinderella is my current favorite of the remakes, but this may dethrone it for first place. That one is probably my second favorite. I liked The Jungle Book the most.
|
|
egon1982
Sophomore
@egon1982
Posts: 994
Likes: 268
|
Post by egon1982 on May 16, 2019 3:52:49 GMT
Those effects look incredible, though it does seem to be a shot-for-shot remake - what's the point? And if anyone is appalled by how bad Disney's live action remake of Aladdin looks? Don't just boycott that film. Boycott all of Disney's live action remakes. That includes The Lion King and Lady and the Tramp. Because if you contribute to The Lion King being hit, you are not showing Disney anything other than you want more of this horseshit. Bad reviews won't mean a thing. Disney cares only about the bottom line and pure profit. Aladdin could completely tank and lose hundreds of millions of dollars and Disney would not bat an eye if The Lion King makes over a billion. Aladdin looks like crap, the CGI that was crapped on the original film on the enterance to the cave looks just as fake as the teaser and doesn't have any of the style or flare the CGI one did, this has none and feeling not of the cast members even Will Smith as Genie. The CGI of him is atrocious and Disney is getting raked over the coals on how poor this is and looks bland/boring and none of it is making me go "Oh it looks like an event film", same for Lion King. Can't we just re-issue the original films with some updated animation because they still hold up really good to this day, both Aladdin and Lion King and two of them in my opinion are the best animated films of the 90s among others. We don't need an update, we don't need a live-action remake of Lion King which isn't even live-action, it's CGI, don't need a live-action remake of Aladdin as it's already been made, i mean maybe do a new adaptation of Aladdin and his wonderful life than do a remake of the Disney film. I hope the people who saw the trailer and didn't like what they saw then speak with your wallet, and if your tired of Disney's lazy halfassed cashgrab remakes of their classics, don't pay to see them and that's how your gonna send your message. So if you are sick of this lazy shit as much as I am, do not pay to see any of their live action remakes and just contribute to diminishing returns. I have yet to give them a single cent for these casghrab efforts and I will continue to do so. That is the only way they will consider stopping. Because if they keep making money, no matter how bad the word of mouth and reviews are, Disney will not give a damn and keep making them. And if any film of live-action bombs which has happened to Dumbo then Disney will be like "oh wow, i guess people are tired of this! i guess audiences doesn't want this!" and that's how your gonna send your message. And if they are hits and make a billion dollars, all it takes is just one of them and one be saying "Oh i wanna see Lion King" and if your like "Aladdin looks like crap but the other ones i wanna go see" then it defeats the purpose, cause if Aladdin underperforms then it doesn't mean cause Disney can absorb that hit in the face, no problem. But if Lion King is a big hit then they are gonna keep these remakes, i guarantee it, no matter how bad the reviews are for Aladdin, no matter how many people don't go to see it, no matter how big of a flop it is, it doesn't matter cause if Lion King makes a billion dollars that just shows them you still want more of that, just watch, watch this all unfold. I mean your gonna get live-action remakes of Little Mermaid or Pocahontas, it's going to happen, i guarantee it and all but eventually the bottom will completely fall out and they are just gonna get diminishing returns, because they are no longer about the ideals that Walt Disney built his company around. They are about greed, power and manipulation of your nostalgia. If not? That what is the point? There is no need for lazy live action Disney remakes and it is a shame that films like this get the pass and make millions. Like i said, eventually your just gonna get diminishing returns and soon the bottom will eventually fall. I want the Disney that made the original and was a genuine trendsetter back in the good old days. Not the current version which is just pumping out reheated left overs, bad Pirates sequels with a upcoming reboot, sequels to Pixar films (except Incredibles 2 which i wanted a sequel since 2004 and Toy Story 4 is not needed when the story ended with 3 as your just beating a dad horse after 3) and failed adaptations of parts of their park like Tomorrowland. I want them to do creative things like Zootopia and some others.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on May 16, 2019 7:34:46 GMT
They have the money to say FU to the audience which is what they have been doing for a number of years.
It is not a supply-demand thing.
It's more like the printing of leaflets with Lenin's picture on it.
The only way this would change is if these companies were much smaller and therefore had more competition.
The old Disney had to rely on United Artists and RKO because the big globalist-leaning companies wanted nothing to do with him (despite the fact that Snow White was the biggest hit of 1938--the idea that these biggie companies are motivated by public taste has always been bullshit).
If that were true there would have been no reason for United Artists.
|
|
