|
|
Post by drystyx on Jun 9, 2019 1:13:54 GMT
And it's none of my d.. business what she does, cause it's her choice, and it's none of anyone else's business, cause Woman One wants to kill Woman Two, because each time Woman Two shows up, it gives Woman One a stomach ache. It upsets her stomach, and that's her body.
D... creeps want to make war on Woman One and say her choice to kill Woman Two is their business, but it's none of their d... business. They're waging WAR on women!
Had enough of this war against women.
Now Woman Three visits an oil well. Well, it's full of oil, oil she dumps when she's changed her car oil. And Woman Four stumbled into it and is groaning and hurting the ears of Woman Three.
So Woman Three has a choice, and it's her right to the choice to light a torch and burn the oil and the woman in the well to make her stop yelling and hurting the ears of Woman Three. And it's none of my d... business, cause it's her body. And I won't be one of those jackals making a war against women.
Had enough of this war against women.
And these people thinking it's their d.. business to say killing human beings is not a nice thing to do. Where do they get off on that? The choice to kill human beings must take precedent over the right to life, or else it's a war against women. Now who can argue with that?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2019 1:50:15 GMT
As analogies go, that one sucked.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jun 9, 2019 12:08:31 GMT
How on Earth does the other woman giver her a stomach ache? It this some sort of mutant superpower and if so will she join the X-Men, The Avengers or whatever motley crew of villains turn up in the next outing?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2019 12:19:06 GMT
How on Earth does the other woman giver her a stomach ache? It this some sort of mutant superpower and if so will she join the X-Men, The Avengers or whatever motley crew of villains turn up in the next outing? Exactly. It's not really possible for woman B's presence to directly cause woman A's body to suffer. The most that can happen is woman B's presence annoys woman A, and the stress causes her some physical discomfort. Our right to bodily autonomy also doesn't extend outside our bodies. For example I can't say "well capitalism makes me feel unwell, so I have a right to demand that society reform itself into anarcho-communism so that I feel better." Bodily autonomy allows me control of what happens inside my skin, not outside it. Sucky analogy is sucky.
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Jun 9, 2019 12:28:58 GMT
How on Earth does the other woman giver her a stomach ache? It this some sort of mutant superpower and if so will she join the X-Men, The Avengers or whatever motley crew of villains turn up in the next outing? Exactly. It's not really possible for woman B's presence to directly cause woman A's body to suffer. The most that can happen is woman B's presence annoys woman A, and the stress causes her some physical discomfort. Our right to bodily autonomy also doesn't extend outside our bodies. For example I can't say "well capitalism makes me feel unwell, so I have a right to demand that society reform itself into anarcho-communism so that I feel better." Bodily autonomy allows me control of what happens inside my skin, not outside it. Sucky analogy is sucky. What gives you and Stammer Head the right to judge that woman? Or why her body suffers? Stop waging this war on women! We have morals around here. It's not of your d... business why her body suffers. Male chauvinist pigs waging this war on women. This is a brave new world with new age morality, and you're not hip to it. You're square, man. Square.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jun 9, 2019 12:40:36 GMT
Exactly. It's not really possible for woman B's presence to directly cause woman A's body to suffer. The most that can happen is woman B's presence annoys woman A, and the stress causes her some physical discomfort. Our right to bodily autonomy also doesn't extend outside our bodies. For example I can't say "well capitalism makes me feel unwell, so I have a right to demand that society reform itself into anarcho-communism so that I feel better." Bodily autonomy allows me control of what happens inside my skin, not outside it. Sucky analogy is sucky. What gives you and Stammer Head the right to judge that woman? Or why her body suffers? Stop waging this war on women! We have morals around here. It's not of your d... business why her body suffers. Male chauvinist pigs waging this war on women. This is a brave new world with new age morality, and you're not hip to it. You're square, man. Square. Why do you say I’m judging a woman for having mutant superpowers? We don’t know if she’s on the side of good or evil yet.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2019 12:52:59 GMT
Exactly. It's not really possible for woman B's presence to directly cause woman A's body to suffer. The most that can happen is woman B's presence annoys woman A, and the stress causes her some physical discomfort. Our right to bodily autonomy also doesn't extend outside our bodies. For example I can't say "well capitalism makes me feel unwell, so I have a right to demand that society reform itself into anarcho-communism so that I feel better." Bodily autonomy allows me control of what happens inside my skin, not outside it. Sucky analogy is sucky. What gives you and Stammer Head the right to judge that woman? Or why her body suffers? Stop waging this war on women! We have morals around here. It's not of your d... business why her body suffers. Male chauvinist pigs waging this war on women. This is a brave new world with new age morality, and you're not hip to it. You're square, man. Square. Still a poor analogy.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 9, 2019 15:53:24 GMT
And it's none of my d.. business what she does, cause it's her choice, and it's none of anyone else's business, cause Woman One wants to kill Woman Two, because each time Woman Two shows up, it gives Woman One a stomach ache. It upsets her stomach, and that's her body. D... creeps want to make war on Woman One and say her choice to kill Woman Two is their business, but it's none of their d... business. They're waging WAR on women! Had enough of this war against women. Now Woman Three visits an oil well. Well, it's full of oil, oil she dumps when she's changed her car oil. And Woman Four stumbled into it and is groaning and hurting the ears of Woman Three. So Woman Three has a choice, and it's her right to the choice to light a torch and burn the oil and the woman in the well to make her stop yelling and hurting the ears of Woman Three. And it's none of my d... business, cause it's her body. And I won't be one of those jackals making a war against women. Had enough of this war against women. And these people thinking it's their d.. business to say killing human beings is not a nice thing to do. Where do they get off on that? The choice to kill human beings must take precedent over the right to life, or else it's a war against women. Now who can argue with that?
I'm all ears.
|
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jun 9, 2019 16:54:35 GMT
Stammerhead
That is judging, honey.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jun 9, 2019 22:09:04 GMT
Stammerhead
That is judging, honey.
No it’s not but if it is which woman am I judging? By the way, I’ve been meaning to ask you if you are allergic to pressing on the QUOTE button.
|
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jun 10, 2019 0:55:53 GMT
As analogies go, that one sucked. It sucked pretty bad as coherent prose goes as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2019 1:36:49 GMT
As analogies go, that one sucked. It sucked pretty bad as coherent prose goes as well. Yeah, I figured that was pretty much a given.
|
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jun 10, 2019 2:24:52 GMT
Stammerhead
That is judging, honey.
Quote people properly please.
|
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jun 10, 2019 2:38:50 GMT
WHY thank you, honeykins!
|
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jun 10, 2019 5:21:36 GMT
Research this word---SARCASM.
|
|
|
|
Post by rizdek on Jun 10, 2019 11:55:26 GMT
And it's none of my d.. business what she does, cause it's her choice, and it's none of anyone else's business, cause Woman One wants to kill Woman Two, because each time Woman Two shows up, it gives Woman One a stomach ache. It upsets her stomach, and that's her body. D... creeps want to make war on Woman One and say her choice to kill Woman Two is their business, but it's none of their d... business. They're waging WAR on women! Had enough of this war against women. Now Woman Three visits an oil well. Well, it's full of oil, oil she dumps when she's changed her car oil. And Woman Four stumbled into it and is groaning and hurting the ears of Woman Three. So Woman Three has a choice, and it's her right to the choice to light a torch and burn the oil and the woman in the well to make her stop yelling and hurting the ears of Woman Three. And it's none of my d... business, cause it's her body. And I won't be one of those jackals making a war against women. Had enough of this war against women. And these people thinking it's their d.. business to say killing human beings is not a nice thing to do. Where do they get off on that? The choice to kill human beings must take precedent over the right to life, or else it's a war against women. Now who can argue with that? What if woman one eally doesn't want to kill the other woman, but just doesn't want to be around her...is that ok? And what if her "not being around her" caused the woman to die? Is woman one obligated to stick around and take care of woman two or can she leave?
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Jun 10, 2019 21:45:04 GMT
And it's none of my d.. business what she does, cause it's her choice, and it's none of anyone else's business, cause Woman One wants to kill Woman Two, because each time Woman Two shows up, it gives Woman One a stomach ache. It upsets her stomach, and that's her body. D... creeps want to make war on Woman One and say her choice to kill Woman Two is their business, but it's none of their d... business. They're waging WAR on women! Had enough of this war against women. Now Woman Three visits an oil well. Well, it's full of oil, oil she dumps when she's changed her car oil. And Woman Four stumbled into it and is groaning and hurting the ears of Woman Three. So Woman Three has a choice, and it's her right to the choice to light a torch and burn the oil and the woman in the well to make her stop yelling and hurting the ears of Woman Three. And it's none of my d... business, cause it's her body. And I won't be one of those jackals making a war against women. Had enough of this war against women. And these people thinking it's their d.. business to say killing human beings is not a nice thing to do. Where do they get off on that? The choice to kill human beings must take precedent over the right to life, or else it's a war against women. Now who can argue with that? What if woman one eally doesn't want to kill the other woman, but just doesn't want to be around her...is that ok? And what if her "not being around her" caused the woman to die? Is woman one obligated to stick around and take care of woman two or can she leave? That's extenuating circumstances. We have "lifeboat situations" and "near lifeboat situations" in which a civilized society declares a second or third degree murder, or simply something out of control. Laws against killing innocent and helpless people mean just that. Killing. The choice of killing, when there is no lifeboat crisis. The mother who panics and doesn't believe she can take care of a child is not making a "choice". She's in a lifeboat. "Pro choice" denies that there is a lifeboat. I didn't make up the term. Thank the raving lunatics who made up the term for that. To say that it isn't anyone's business is something that makes zero sense. Graham and the other illiterates of the board have made nonsense posts and whined with messages that made no sense. A culture that applauds second and third degree murder and proclaims it some sort of heroic action is a Satanic culture, by any definition. There is no natural explanation for the raving lunatics who say that exterminating the lives of those who are helpless is none of our d.. business. Incidentally, no offense is meant when I say that is exactly what took place when bystanders allowed Jews to be exterminated in Nazi Germany. It was convenient. Sure, there was a lifeboat situation, with only enough food and resources for some to survive, and Hitler can thank foreign powers such as France for giving him the support of people in a "lifeboat situation". Those people weren't praised for their actions, and they shouldn't have been praised. It is everyone's business. The reason is written in blood on a concentration camp wall. There is no logic in the raving lunatic who says killing babies is "none of our d.. business". The call it "choice", and sometimes it isn't rally a choice. If it's for survival, it isn't a choice. It's survival. The ones who do it out of "choice" are clearly saying they're demon possessed. Only a fool goes in the water to save a drowning person. Life saving manuals all say to try to save the drowning person by staying on the dock or bank and offering a rope or life preserver. That's "choice". Deciding not to drown with a drowning person is not a choice. It's survival. It doesn't make the person on the shore guilty, and it doesn't make the person a hero. it just means the person had "no choice". So "pro choice" is a self accusing term, to be honest. The civilized society takes care of the helpless. If it means foster care, it means foster care. If it means ample rewards for citizens to get operations to make them sterile, then that's what a civilized society does. For instance, no one should be allowed to hold public office, run for office, or be appointed to a position of stewardship unless that person proves he or she has such an operation. Fewer children, more adoptions, out of incentive.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2019 1:57:13 GMT
don't do drugs, son
|
|
