|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 13, 2019 13:39:38 GMT
attack civilians? In Homecoming, Spider-Man attacks a civilian who was just trying to get into his car and hadn't committed any crime. In Far From Home, Peter orders a killer drone attack against a fellow classmate who is his competition for MJ and who got an embarrassing photo of Peter with his pants down. Which civilian will Spider-Man attack in the next movie? |
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Jul 13, 2019 13:47:45 GMT
Dunno, why do movie Superman and Batman kill people so willy nilly?
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 13, 2019 13:53:10 GMT
Dunno, why do movie Superman and Batman kill people so willy nilly? Those people were criminals or villains in the act of committing heinous crimes. MCU Spider-Man attacks innocent civilians who haven't committed any crime.
|
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Jul 13, 2019 14:11:40 GMT
Dunno, why do movie Superman and Batman kill people so willy nilly? Those people were criminals or villains in the act of committing heinous crimes. MCU Spider-Man attacks innocent civilians who haven't committed any crime. What crime did the unborn babies commit that Superman killed in order to also kill the other Kryptonians, what gives them the right to just kill without trial?
Also you assume much by saying they didn't commit any crime how do you know that? maybe that kid jay walked or illegally downloaded music or porn, maybe the guy trying to break into his car littered or was infact a sociopathic serial killer who was trying to get into his car so he could follow his next victim he planned to brutally murder?
Hasn't appeared to commit any apparent crime, that's what you meant to say I think.
But then why did Superman destroy that jerks truck and cause probably thousands of dollars of damage to the road and paths that either the property owner or local council would have to pay to fix, not to mention inventory that was brought and paid for by people in MOS, or go and assault that jerk in the end of Superman 2, whose only crime was being a jerk to Clark, what gives Clark the right decide eye for an eye is fair but only when he has superpowers to protect him?
Why does Batman get to cause thousands of dollars maybe millions just so he can evade police, or assault other vigilantes doing the exact same thing as he is, what gives him the right to do this? because he's rich? seems unfair and hypocritical, why does Batman get to beat and assault people every night just because he refuses to actually deal with his clear emotional trauma in a healthy manner like with therapy?
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 13, 2019 14:12:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 13, 2019 14:55:07 GMT
What crime did the unborn babies commit that Superman killed So you're anti-abortion? maybe that kid jay walked or illegally downloaded music or porn, maybe the guy trying to break into his car littered Misdemeanors which don't warrant being physically attacked. It would be like the cops arresting and beating up someone for getting a parking ticket. why did Superman destroy that jerks truck Because the jerk was a bully who harassed a waitress and thought he could do whatever he wanted and no one would stop him. And Superman didn't attack him. Also, this is the MCU board and this is a thread about an MCU character. Why are you bringing DC into this thread and always trying to start an MCU vs DC war?
|
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jul 13, 2019 15:15:45 GMT
Because he's young, inexperienced and the drone strike was obviously unintentional.
|
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Jul 13, 2019 15:42:14 GMT
What crime did the unborn babies commit that Superman killed So you're anti-abortion? maybe that kid jay walked or illegally downloaded music or porn, maybe the guy trying to break into his car littered Misdemeanors which don't warrant being physically attacked. It would be like the cops arresting and beating up someone for getting a parking ticket. why did Superman destroy that jerks truck Because the jerk was a bully who harassed a waitress and thought he could do whatever he wanted and no one would stop him. And Superman didn't attack him. Also, this is the MCU board and this is a thread about an MCU character. Why are you bringing DC into this thread and always trying to start an MCU vs DC war? Pretty sure killing an entire civilisation is a little different, as is deciding the fate of unborn children that aren't even yours, and no I am not anti-abortion, I think it has it's place I just don't fully agree with how it can be abused is all, but here is neither the time or the place for such a topic so don't try and distract from the conversation with such a cheap ploy.
As for Misdemeanours I agree they aren't major crimes deserving death penalties, but neither is serving as off the books transport for non-illicit cargo, especially when Batman's intent is to steal it himself there by committing a far greater crime, not to mention to enable him to commit said theft he killed people to do so, but this is why I said you need to be more clear in your wording, see unlike you I don't need to misquote people to make a point.
And again because he was a jerk Clark was entitled to ruin his livelihood, destroy public or private property, and ruin cargo someone else was probably relying on arriving on schedule?
But you still cannot make a point can you, have to misquote snippets of what I say to pretend, it's sad you don't posses the skills to actually debate properly.
|
|
|
|
Post by merh on Jul 13, 2019 23:47:39 GMT
attack civilians? In Homecoming, Spider-Man attacks a civilian who was just trying to get into his car and hadn't committed any crime. Using a slim jim to get into a car is suspicious. And he destroyed the drone. He saved him. Hero.
|
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Jul 14, 2019 2:21:53 GMT
Both examples were unintentional you moron. In Homecoming, he just mistook the guy for a car thief. In Far From Home, all he wanted was an embarrassing photo of himself deleted. He didn't want his classmate to be killed by a drone. Again, that was an accident. He of course, destroys the droid he accidentally activated. But you keep forgetting to bring that up because you're a fucking idiot. You've prove once again you're an idiot. |
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Jul 14, 2019 2:54:45 GMT
Those people were criminals or villains in the act of committing heinous crimes. MCU Spider-Man attacks innocent civilians who haven't committed any crime. What crime did the unborn babies commit that Superman killed in order to also kill the other Kryptonians, what gives them the right to just kill without trial?
Also you assume much by saying they didn't commit any crime how do you know that? maybe that kid jay walked or illegally downloaded music or porn, maybe the guy trying to break into his car littered or was infact a sociopathic serial killer who was trying to get into his car so he could follow his next victim he planned to brutally murder?
Hasn't appeared to commit any apparent crime, that's what you meant to say I think.
But then why did Superman destroy that jerks truck and cause probably thousands of dollars of damage to the road and paths that either the property owner or local council would have to pay to fix, not to mention inventory that was brought and paid for by people in MOS, or go and assault that jerk in the end of Superman 2, whose only crime was being a jerk to Clark, what gives Clark the right decide eye for an eye is fair but only when he has superpowers to protect him?
Why does Batman get to cause thousands of dollars maybe millions just so he can evade police, or assault other vigilantes doing the exact same thing as he is, what gives him the right to do this? because he's rich? seems unfair and hypocritical, why does Batman get to beat and assault people every night just because he refuses to actually deal with his clear emotional trauma in a healthy manner like with therapy?
He didn’t kill any unborn babies. He stopped Zod from terraforming the Earth. DC-Fan is an idiot, but retorts like this don’t make any sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by poutinep on Jul 14, 2019 4:01:35 GMT
You don't even watch the movies.  |
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Jul 14, 2019 11:18:10 GMT
What crime did the unborn babies commit that Superman killed in order to also kill the other Kryptonians, what gives them the right to just kill without trial?
Also you assume much by saying they didn't commit any crime how do you know that? maybe that kid jay walked or illegally downloaded music or porn, maybe the guy trying to break into his car littered or was infact a sociopathic serial killer who was trying to get into his car so he could follow his next victim he planned to brutally murder?
Hasn't appeared to commit any apparent crime, that's what you meant to say I think.
But then why did Superman destroy that jerks truck and cause probably thousands of dollars of damage to the road and paths that either the property owner or local council would have to pay to fix, not to mention inventory that was brought and paid for by people in MOS, or go and assault that jerk in the end of Superman 2, whose only crime was being a jerk to Clark, what gives Clark the right decide eye for an eye is fair but only when he has superpowers to protect him?
Why does Batman get to cause thousands of dollars maybe millions just so he can evade police, or assault other vigilantes doing the exact same thing as he is, what gives him the right to do this? because he's rich? seems unfair and hypocritical, why does Batman get to beat and assault people every night just because he refuses to actually deal with his clear emotional trauma in a healthy manner like with therapy?
He didn’t kill any unborn babies. He stopped Zod from terraforming the Earth. DC-Fan is an idiot, but retorts like this don’t make any sense. But by stopping the terraforming he destroyed the Kryptonian baby factory thing they had going on which they needed the codex from Superman to get working, which I dunno if I am just confusing how it all looked, could have sworn they looked like they were unborn children in like eggs or jelly bean looking things, or is the on Krypton?
But still that was the unborn potential for an entire species that got destroyed to stop the Kryptonians, the terraforming was unconnected iirc, point is I am exaggerating things for dramatic effect, not like being reasonable or talking pure logic helps in anyway when dealing with DC-Fan, but at least this way amuses me.
|
|
raiderjedi
Sophomore
@raiderjedi
Posts: 452
Likes: 339
 
|
Post by raiderjedi on Jul 14, 2019 16:40:09 GMT
Why does Superman allow terrorists and warlords to terrororize and subjugate innocent civilians and then only intervene when Lois Lane is in danger? Why did Superman murder that guy that had captured Lois but did nothing when Jimmy Olsen was murdered?
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jul 14, 2019 21:27:36 GMT
attack civilians? In Homecoming, Spider-Man attacks a civilian who was just trying to get into his car and hadn't committed any crime. In Far From Home, Peter orders a killer drone attack against a fellow classmate who is his competition for MJ and who got an embarrassing photo of Peter with his pants down. Which civilian will Spider-Man attack in the next movie? One of the many reasons I hate "The Amazing Spider-Man" is because he beats up a group of innocent civilians in a subway car.
|
|
havenless
Sophomore
@havenless
Posts: 715
Likes: 311
|
Post by havenless on Jul 14, 2019 21:50:20 GMT
Dunno, why do movie Superman and Batman kill people so willy nilly? Those people were criminals or villains in the act of committing heinous crimes. MCU Spider-Man attacks innocent civilians who haven't committed any crime. What was the heinous crime Batman was about to kill Superman for? Illegal immigration? |
|
