|
|
Post by MooseNugget on Oct 12, 2019 5:45:23 GMT
Which zombies do you prefer?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2019 6:46:49 GMT
Walking shuffling Romero type for me.
They're way more creepy.
|
|
|
|
Post by MooseNugget on Oct 12, 2019 6:50:40 GMT
There's fun movies with running zombies like Train to Busan, 28 Days Later and Return of The Living Dead.
But walking zombies are more realistic. Not only are they scary but also create an atmosphere of dread.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Oct 12, 2019 9:00:26 GMT
Runners are technically scarier in real life, but I prefer the traditional walking zombies for that creepy effect.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lebowskidoo 🦞 on Oct 12, 2019 22:23:29 GMT
Eventually the walkers catch up to somebody and slowly have their way with them, which is beyond creepy. Running zombies do get the adrenalin flowing though.
|
|
biker1
Junior Member
@biker1
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 743
|
Post by biker1 on Oct 18, 2019 6:38:58 GMT
the frenzy of runners is probably more frightening - and something like the opening scene of sequel 28 weeks later... might be a case in point. However the vision of zombies as creeping walkers, returning from a dead state, is the iconic depiction I prefer.
I remember heated arguments on the imdb horror board years ago over whether runners were actually even zombies? I have no idea where the argument stands these days, but I guess a compromise has been reached.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Oct 18, 2019 11:15:27 GMT
Walking. I don't think anyone could survive a running zombie epidemic. We'd all be dead in days. Unless it were just infected humanoids that didn't require headshots to stop them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Spencer on Oct 18, 2019 16:19:57 GMT
Walking.
|
|
rogerthat
Sophomore
@rogerthat
Posts: 734
Likes: 478
 
|
Post by rogerthat on Oct 19, 2019 1:55:59 GMT
While I think the runners better explain how zombies could overcome society, I find the walkers creepier.
|
|
