|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 22, 2019 0:07:36 GMT
BvS had massive revenues everywhere, regardless WARNER's "net profit". That's it. We're discussing Batman's supreme resonance and power, not the "net profits". The BvS movie introduced a brand new BATMAN, wherever 'Homecoming' presented us with a "new" Spider-Man who had already debuted on CIVIL WAR. Iron Man was added to the mix to help boost the box office income of the movie.
Said that, the movies had almost the same box office gross. Another proof that Batman is the most profitable one and doesn't even need hype or further introductions.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Oct 22, 2019 2:13:36 GMT
LMAO FINAL GROSS = 872,7 MILLION DOLLARS WORLDWIDE God I bet you're orphan and just grew up without parents (they abandoned you). That would explain why you insult people who try to make you realize the TRUTH through numbers and facts. You're so angry. Yep kid, maybe your life has been hard, but make up your mind and relax; we're not evil, we're just trying to make you realize the truth. Your hero, Spider-Man, would not like your puerile behaviour at all. And he would recognize Batman's movie power anyway. Theatrically it earned WB less than it cost to make them if so fact so Einstein that's a fucking bomb.
And if you are going to try and insult me don't just tell us about your life story and say it happened to me, we all know no one loved you, how could they? you're a cunt, but try to be amusing with it you badged nosed crotch cloth.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Oct 22, 2019 2:27:02 GMT
We're discussing Batman's supreme resonance and power, not the "net profits". But then Batman movies don't make as much as Spider-Man movies anymore so that would also go Spider-Man's way considering the last two movies featuring Batman as a lead were financial disappointments. Yeah that's actually a benefit for Batman far more so than Spider-man. There was a ton of hype for Batman vs Superman largely because it had a new Batman. They kept the hype train going for 3 years. It actually opened a lot higher than Spider-man Homecoming. It's just that BvS ended up such a disaster that it fell off the cliff whereas Homecoming was well liked and was able to make up that opening difference and prevail in the end. BvS also included Wonder Woman, Flash and Aquaman to boost its performance too. Which is actually quite bad all things considered because BvS cost about $80 million more to make. It should never have been about the same anyway. This was Batman vs Superman, the two most famous heroes on the big screen for the first time while putting Wonder Woman on the big screen for the first time, including Superman's death and a huge hype machine surrounding it for years. Homecoming wasn't even the first time seeing that Spider-man or seeing him with Iron Man. I genuinely remember people thought BvS was going to rival Avengers level money nevermind Spider-Man.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 22, 2019 12:23:37 GMT
You're the only one in the world pretending that BvS is a "bomb". I think that, beyond videogames and YouTube rappers, your intelligence walks in the dark. Oh well, let's hope you will grow up someday.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 22, 2019 12:28:00 GMT
BvS, SUICIDE SQUAD, JOKER are all huge worldwide hits.
Homecoming used Iron Man to boost its ticket sales. Said that, BvS, a 100% BATMAN MOVIE, grossed as much as Homecoming ----- despite bad press, corrupted critics and "Martha" Nerds shouting stupid things on Internet.
The cumulative BATMAN MOVIE FRANCHISE gross surpasses Spider-Man's. Heck, only the 1989 BATMAN movie had an amount of total revenues consisting of 2 billion dollars, according to Forbes.
You can't beat the Bat. People have chosen. Long time ago...
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Oct 22, 2019 13:09:25 GMT
If it's such a big deal that an R-rated film is making so much money, perhaps they should only include the money it makes in countries where it is r-rated. Seeing that each country has it's own rating system and criteria and the boast is that despite that rating it has done so well, well it should only include the domestic gross...which is $120m of the number one spot, and puts Joker #9 on the list
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Oct 22, 2019 14:59:04 GMT
You're the only one in the world pretending that BvS is a "bomb". I think that, beyond videogames and YouTube rappers, your intelligence walks in the dark. Oh well, let's hope you will grow up someday. Honestly I think you must be retarded, no one can pretend to be this thick can they? But this is all an act then bravo sir, your trolling is Daniel Day Lewis level of character work, though that probably means you have in fact shat yourself to truly be in character, and that's just nasty.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Oct 22, 2019 16:36:39 GMT
BvS, SUICIDE SQUAD, JOKER are all huge worldwide hits. But BvS is the only one that's a Batman movie so the other two don't matter. Justice League was the other Batman movie at a push and that flopped. Yeah...that's a real bad thing. A Batman vs Superman movie introducing Wonder Woman, Flash and Aquaman made only as much as Homecoming. You're spinning it into a positive, it's a huge negative. It never should have made only as much as Homecoming. It's opening day made Avengers level money, better than Civil War, a tad better than Avengers and a tad behind Age of Ultron. It's opening weekend was $50 million better than Homecoming yet not only did it not go on to make Avengers money, it even finished lower than Homecoming. Then Far From Home made like $500 million more than Justice League. If Justice League had made half as much money again it'd still be well behind.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Oct 22, 2019 17:26:30 GMT
BvS, SUICIDE SQUAD, JOKER are all huge worldwide hits. Homecoming used Iron Man to boost its ticket sales. Said that, BvS, a 100% BATMAN MOVIE, grossed as much as Homecoming ----- despite bad press, corrupted critics and "Martha" Nerds shouting stupid things on Internet. The cumulative BATMAN MOVIE FRANCHISE gross surpasses Spider-Man's. Heck, only the 1989 BATMAN movie had an amount of total revenues consisting of 2 billion dollars, according to Forbes. You can't beat the Bat. People have chosen. Long time ago... You understand the S in BVS stands for Superman right? and the movie also features a slew of Superman characters and a far more important and prominent supporting role from Wonder Woman than Homecoming featured the Iron Man/ Tony Stark expanded cameo.
YOU EAT GOAT CHEESE WITH JACK THE RIPPER UNDER THE BLOOD MOON WHILST TICKLING FISH AND LISTENING TO YANNI AS A FROSTY THE SNOWMAN DANCES!!
See I can make things bold also, doing so doesn't make it true, no matter how many times you repeat that baseless idiotic statement, and I did it in ALL CAPS!!!!
Also Batman 89's $2b isn't a had but has, as in it's amassed $2b in total revenue since 89, not how much it made at the time, it did make like $850m though in merchandise and licensing between 89 and 92 iirc, which is why Returns made everyone shit themselves when Burton made it too dark and creepy for kids.
And Spidey is still No.1 or Iron Man, depending on how you look at things I guess, just remember BVS is a Batman AND Superman movie WITH Wonder Woman...that's not a 100% Batman film, 50% at best.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 22, 2019 18:36:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 22, 2019 18:42:07 GMT
Flash was a 3 seconds-cameo at best. As well as Aquaman (2 seconds?). They don't count at all.
It was a proper and legit Batman movie (see the official title) introducing a NEW actor as Batman and featuring Superman and Wonder Woman. So what? Bad press, bad marketing, MCU shrills, corrupted critics, funny and weird "Martha" fanboys on Internet just slowed down the movie's success ---- despite all this, it managed to gross almost 900 million dollars and having home video revenues totalling more than 300 million dollars worldwide.
It was mammoth.
Spider-Bimbo was introduced in 'CIVIL WAR', and it wasn't a cameo.
BvS keeps fruiting BIG BUCKS as blu-ray, TV program and so on...
DAZZ, I understand that you're a delirant, hallucinating psycho monkey. Not answering you, it's useless. You need meds. We will pray for you, let's hope you get healed.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Oct 22, 2019 20:36:17 GMT
Flash was a 3 seconds-cameo at best. As well as Aquaman (2 seconds?). They don't count at all. It was a proper and legit Batman movie (see the official title) introducing a NEW actor as Batman and featuring Superman and Wonder Woman. So what? Bad press, bad marketing, MCU shrills, corrupted critics, funny and weird "Martha" fanboys on Internet just slowed down the movie's success ---- despite all this, it managed to gross almost 900 million dollars and having home video revenues totalling more than 300 million dollars worldwide. It was mammoth. Spider-Bimbo was introduced in 'CIVIL WAR', and it wasn't a cameo. BvS keeps fruiting BIG BUCKS as blu-ray, TV program and so on... DAZZ, I understand that you're a delirant, hallucinating psycho monkey. Not answering you, it's useless. You need meds. We will pray for you, let's hope you get healed. Aw that's cute, well in that case you keep tossing yourself of repeating the lie "Batman's the best, Batman's No.1, Batman is the most loved" until you wank yourself into a coma, no wonder you are so invested in Joker as a movie, a mentally disturbed simpering loser suddenly breaks out of his shell to the love of millions, just ignore the homicidal tendencies I guess and it's you, thou obviously all the glory is just in his head, just like you, and in reality he is an institutionalised mental patient laughing to himself in the corner, again just like you, jeez well I will leave you to living vicariously through someone elses work and success, keep lying to yourself about Batman yah fruitcake and have a nice night.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Oct 22, 2019 21:31:59 GMT
Flash was a 3 seconds-cameo at best. As well as Aquaman (2 seconds?). They don't count at all. It counts because they let people know they'd be in the movie before release and it was used as a selling point. Flash also appeared in two scenes even if his total screen time was about 30 seconds. The movie had fantastic marketing, one thing it did very well was maintain interest for three whole years. Those other things are self explanatory. The movie wasn't any good. Everyone rushed out to see it, it had some of the best opening day/weekend figures ever at the time but it ended up being such a disappointment that it dropped like a stone. I can't recall any other truly big movie like that falling so fast. It had the 9th highest worldwide opening. You have to go down to the 22nd highest to find a movie that finished with less than what BvS finished with. Critics or fans weren't out to get it, it just failed. You're also ignoring the fact that Justice League is a Batman movie according to you and it seemingly lost money. The first ever Justice League movie made less money than Amazing Spider-man 2, the movie that was a financial disappointment itself. Will The Batman make the $1.1 billion that Far From Home made? Not likely.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 22, 2019 23:05:14 GMT
LMAO.
Was Batman also featured on THE LEGO MOVIE as one of the leads?
The LEGO Movie
Domestic Total Gross: $257,760,692 Distributor: Warner Bros. Release Date: February 7, 2014 Genre: Animation Runtime: 1 hrs. 40 min. MPAA Rating: PG Production Budget: $60 million
Total Lifetime Grosses
Domestic: $257,760,692 54.9% + Foreign: $211,400,000 45.1%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = Worldwide: $469,160,692
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 23, 2019 11:57:57 GMT
Dazz surrendered. LMAO.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Oct 23, 2019 15:01:18 GMT
Why would I continue arguing with someone who isn't engaged with reality, ignores any actual point brought forward, is just repeating the same lies on repeat, and is a fanatical idiot?
Call it surrender if you want, you simply bore me at this point so I am not engaging you in debate anymore, you are just not worth it as I know I will eventually go too far and insult you so thoroughly I will likely cause offense to Scabab and he'll give me a talking to, sometimes it's worth it, you however are not so thank you, fuck you, bye.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 23, 2019 18:24:25 GMT
No Psycho Monkeys and crazy delusions are allowed on this thread.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Oct 23, 2019 18:26:01 GMT
No crazy delusions are allowed on this thread. But that’s all your posts are.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Oct 23, 2019 18:28:10 GMT
No crazy delusions are allowed on this thread. But that’s all your posts are. The nose is red? Don't be clownish, my friend. Deep down in your mind, you know I'm right.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Oct 23, 2019 18:29:34 GMT
Do people prefer their coffee black or with creamer?
|
|