Post by MCDemuth on Apr 25, 2022 21:57:59 GMT
The official explanation of an avalanche is by far most likely.
The tent was slashed, but it was slashed from the inside, which means they where in quite the hurry to get out. Which is further confirmed that most of them had no shoes on when they fled. It would definitively account from most of the damages to the people. The rest is simply wild animals feeding on the corpses or natural decay.
As for the high radiation on some of the clothes, one of them,Alexander Kolevatov was worked in producing materials for the growing nuclear industry. It's extremely likely it came from him.
Yes. I was just looking at an article from a Dyatlov Pass mystery website that discusses all this:
dyatlovpass.com/puzrin-gaume
in less than an hour, traces of the small slab avalanche (with a similar release size as the one assumed in our model) were erased because it was covered by wind-transported snow. This explains why the Dyatlov rescue team could not find avalanche signs above the tent 3 weeks after the incident. Snow observed on the tent and below it could be from the slab, as shown in our numerical simulations;
"numerical simulations"?
Seriously?
A small avalanche involving lightweight snow that blew away shortly after it happened?
How convenient!
But the avalanche theory doesn't answer any of the questions that arise from the case files. It was the first theory that the investigation in 1959 looked into, and it was discarded not because there couldn't have been an avalanche, but because there was none.
The evidence in the case files shows no avalanche, and this new publication can't change that:
- Photos and witness testimonies from searchers that found the tent in February 1959 state there was no trace of avalanche. There were also documented traces of urination and footprints. How would this remain visible if there was an avalanche?
- Puzrin and Gaume say that the hikers cut open their tent because there was an avalanche. The case files contain photos of footprints going down along the path of the alleged avalanche, slowly, orderly, abreast. Not the behavior of people that are abandoning their tent to escape from an avalanche.
- Puzrin and Gaume say that the avalanche caused the lethal injuries on three of the hikers. The coroner testifies that they lived not more than 20-30 mins, one of them unconscious with a caved in skull. How did they get a mile down where the bodies were found?
The evidence in the case files shows no avalanche, and this new publication can't change that:
- Photos and witness testimonies from searchers that found the tent in February 1959 state there was no trace of avalanche. There were also documented traces of urination and footprints. How would this remain visible if there was an avalanche?
- Puzrin and Gaume say that the hikers cut open their tent because there was an avalanche. The case files contain photos of footprints going down along the path of the alleged avalanche, slowly, orderly, abreast. Not the behavior of people that are abandoning their tent to escape from an avalanche.
- Puzrin and Gaume say that the avalanche caused the lethal injuries on three of the hikers. The coroner testifies that they lived not more than 20-30 mins, one of them unconscious with a caved in skull. How did they get a mile down where the bodies were found?
Avalanche? What avalanche?
People keep saying there was an avalanche, but that's contrary to the evidence...
A small avalanche containing lightweight snow that could blow away?... But if it was that small and light...
Except for the damage to the tent, there was no other damage to the camp site... Skii's were sticking out of the snow just as when the hiker placed them there. They were not knocked over or buried by any avalanche... So how could the avalanche have the force to seriously injure the hikers so badly, but leave everything untouched?
And how did these severely injured people walk a mile away?
Except for some light snow on the tent, probably from blowing snow that happened over three weeks, there was no evidence of any major recent snow suddenly accumulating at the site... Signs of the hikers being at the camp site before the incident were easily discovered... an avalanche would have covered those up...
If there was an Avalanche nearby, after they fled, how were the search teams able to find tracks of them fleeing?... Apparently the tracks were quite lengthy, and they helped the search teams find the bodies... So, why didn't the snow from that avalanche cover those tracks as well?
I would like for someone to prove how a small slab of snow, "Magically" came out of nowhere, and only fell onto the tent, and nowhere else...
dyatlovpass.com/karelin-avalanche-myth?lid=1