|
Post by Schwarzwald Magnus on Apr 21, 2020 23:12:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Apr 21, 2020 23:25:38 GMT
17 but I got top 5. I had to put full name of Ralph Vaughan Williams before it accepted.
|
|
|
Post by Catman on Apr 21, 2020 23:59:54 GMT
19. Sad that John Adams is not included.
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Apr 22, 2020 1:35:32 GMT
no way jose, really?
|
|
|
Post by theauxphou on Apr 22, 2020 20:23:45 GMT
I got 7%. Nailed it!
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Apr 24, 2020 9:43:52 GMT
19. Sad that John Adams is not included. Is Bryan Adams included on that list?
|
|
Jokers_Wilde
Junior Member
@jokerswilde
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 682
|
Post by Jokers_Wilde on Apr 24, 2020 15:09:43 GMT
16. Got the top 5, and 8 of the top 13.
Joker's Wilde
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Apr 24, 2020 15:34:13 GMT
I got 71. Just ran through the big, obvious names, which netted about half. Then I started thinking in terms of era and country and got the other half. Looking at the ones I missed, I'm surprised I forgot Copland even though I got Gershwin. Other than that, most of the other names I missed I'm not terribly familiar with, though I'm surprised I forgot Mascagni and Leoncavallo, given the prevalence of Cav/Pag combo in opera.
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Apr 24, 2020 21:42:48 GMT
I got 71. Just ran through the big, obvious names, which netted about half. Then I started thinking in terms of era and country and got the other half. Looking at the ones I missed, I'm surprised I forgot Copland even though I got Gershwin. Other than that, most of the other names I missed I'm not terribly familiar with, though I'm surprised I forgot Mascagni and Leoncavallo, given the prevalence of Cav/Pag combo in opera. wow this is so impressive. i did the same as you but only made it to 27. then when i looked at the results i was like "wtf, how could i forget about this/that guy" but there were still about 20-30 names I didnt know and wouldnt have remembered. I did to forget some big ones just due to memory fail. got 1-7 and then 9 and 10 and just couldn't come up with number 8. dont remember who that was but it was one of those "of course" names once the time was up. engaging but frustrating test/
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Apr 25, 2020 10:00:50 GMT
I got 71. Just ran through the big, obvious names, which netted about half. Then I started thinking in terms of era and country and got the other half. Looking at the ones I missed, I'm surprised I forgot Copland even though I got Gershwin. Other than that, most of the other names I missed I'm not terribly familiar with, though I'm surprised I forgot Mascagni and Leoncavallo, given the prevalence of Cav/Pag combo in opera. wow this is so impressive. i did the same as you but only made it to 27. then when i looked at the results i was like "wtf, how could i forget about this/that guy" but there were still about 20-30 names I didnt know and wouldnt have remembered. I did to forget some big ones just due to memory fail. got 1-7 and then 9 and 10 and just couldn't come up with number 8. dont remember who that was but it was one of those "of course" names once the time was up. engaging but frustrating test/ Well, I'm kinda the resident classical music geek of this board. I know there's a few of us around here, but not many. I've also had marathons where I spent weeks/months listening to many of these guys, so most of them are pretty firmly lodged into my noggin'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2020 10:30:13 GMT
I got 21 and for my effort I was mocked by the quiz: "You may want to wait on that Jeopardy application." I might have gotten more if I remembered how to spell a lot of the names. I put out my "RSTLNE"-- Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Vivaldi, Wagner, Rossini-- and then sat there fumbling to spell Mendelssohn and Tchaikovsky. I didn't know if I was getting the spelling wrong (I was) or if they weren't on the list. I think this was where I failed. Good stuff, though. And I thought it was a respectable showing for someone who only dabbles in classical.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Apr 30, 2020 6:06:48 GMT
I got 71. Just ran through the big, obvious names, which netted about half. Then I started thinking in terms of era and country and got the other half. Looking at the ones I missed, I'm surprised I forgot Copland even though I got Gershwin. Other than that, most of the other names I missed I'm not terribly familiar with, though I'm surprised I forgot Mascagni and Leoncavallo, given the prevalence of Cav/Pag combo in opera. You are truly one of the smartest posters on this site. Every post is worth reading. Although I am still to get a review of Narayama bushikō.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Apr 30, 2020 12:12:15 GMT
I got 71. Just ran through the big, obvious names, which netted about half. Then I started thinking in terms of era and country and got the other half. Looking at the ones I missed, I'm surprised I forgot Copland even though I got Gershwin. Other than that, most of the other names I missed I'm not terribly familiar with, though I'm surprised I forgot Mascagni and Leoncavallo, given the prevalence of Cav/Pag combo in opera. You are truly one of the smartest posters on this site. Every post is worth reading. Although I am still to get a review of Narayama bushikō. Thanks, but, nah, I'm just a classical music geek. There's a ton of things a quiz like this could be about that I'd fail miserably at! As for the review, believe it or not I haven't seen any films in over a year now. Been mostly involved with music, video games and (lately) TV shows.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Apr 30, 2020 13:24:56 GMT
You are truly one of the smartest posters on this site. Every post is worth reading. Although I am still to get a review of Narayama bushikō. Thanks, but, nah, I'm just a classical music geek. There's a ton of things a quiz like this could be about that I'd fail miserably at! As for the review, believe it or not I haven't seen any films in over a year now. Been mostly involved with music, video games and (lately) TV shows. Yeah, you are probably not well versed with every field but so far you are a tick on movies, on logic, on Bayes theorem and philosophy. Mind you though I do not have a very high respect for philosophy in itself. I find it of little to no use for common people and an extremely boring topic. At least for me. But I understand that you are well versed in the field. Likewise, I highly appreciate your position on politics. Not that you frequently discuss politics but at least you do not display any biases or prejudices. May be you have shown what seems like very simple dismissal of religion in having any sort of positive contribution but it would be impossible for me to point out if you ask any particular instance where you might have done that.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Apr 30, 2020 15:29:25 GMT
Thanks, but, nah, I'm just a classical music geek. There's a ton of things a quiz like this could be about that I'd fail miserably at! As for the review, believe it or not I haven't seen any films in over a year now. Been mostly involved with music, video games and (lately) TV shows. Yeah, you are probably not well versed with every field but so far you are a tick on movies, on logic, on Bayes theorem and philosophy. Mind you though I do not have a very high respect for philosophy in itself. I find it of little to no use for common people and an extremely boring topic. At least for me. But I understand that you are well versed in the field. Likewise, I highly appreciate your position on politics. Not that you frequently discuss politics but at least you do not display any biases or prejudices. May be you have shown what seems like very simple dismissal of religion in having any sort of positive contribution but it would be impossible for me to point out if you ask any particular instance where you might have done that. Well, thanks for the kudos. Because of my various interests I always feel like a jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none sort. I would recommend you not dismiss all philosophy so easily, though. It's an incredibly wide/diverse field that's directly relevant to many aspects of our lives. Take epistemology, eg, which is the study of knowledge. If you don't have any understanding of how knowledge works, you're pretty much at the mercy of cognitive biases and rationalizations, unless you just get lucky and are born rational/logical. Morality/Ethics is another obvious one that's very relevant to our lives. As for politics, yeah, I'm mostly liberal but there are some conservative positions I agree with and I think both sides have extremes that can get loony. As for religion, my position on that has changed a lot over the years. Right now I'd say I'm mostly only anti-fundamentalism and against those who try to push religion onto others or into politics. Beyond that, I don't really have a problem with religion and I actually think it has contributed a lot of positive things to humanity, including much of the best music from the greatest composers. What I tend to say about religion these days is that it's rarely the problem itself; to the extent that it's good and bad it's merely a reflection of what's good and bad in humanity. Eliminating religion wouldn't eliminate what's bad about humanity, as various genocidal atheist regimes proved. I can also appreciate religion as what Wallace Stevens called the "supreme fiction," or fiction that felt so truthful that people simply took it as literally true, and reading Blake, Jung, Stevens, and even Jordan Peterson (to a lesser extent) has made me appreciate how many psychological/experiential truths there are in religion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2020 16:57:17 GMT
Yeah, you are probably not well versed with every field but so far you are a tick on movies, on logic, on Bayes theorem and philosophy. Mind you though I do not have a very high respect for philosophy in itself. I find it of little to no use for common people and an extremely boring topic. At least for me. But I understand that you are well versed in the field. Likewise, I highly appreciate your position on politics. Not that you frequently discuss politics but at least you do not display any biases or prejudices. May be you have shown what seems like very simple dismissal of religion in having any sort of positive contribution but it would be impossible for me to point out if you ask any particular instance where you might have done that. Well, thanks for the kudos. Because of my various interests I always feel like a jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none sort. I would recommend you not dismiss all philosophy so easily, though. It's an incredibly wide/diverse field that's directly relevant to many aspects of our lives. Take epistemology, eg, which is the study of knowledge. If you don't have any understanding of how knowledge works, you're pretty much at the mercy of cognitive biases and rationalizations, unless you just get lucky and are born rational/logical. Morality/Ethics is another obvious one that's very relevant to our lives. As for politics, yeah, I'm mostly liberal but there are some conservative positions I agree with and I think both sides have extremes that can get loony. As for religion, my position on that has changed a lot over the years. Right now I'd say I'm mostly only anti-fundamentalism and against those who try to push religion onto others or into politics. Beyond that, I don't really have a problem with religion and I actually think it has contributed a lot of positive things to humanity, including much of the best music from the greatest composers. What I tend to say about religion these days is that it's rarely the problem itself; to the extent that it's good and bad it's merely a reflection of what's good and bad in humanity. Eliminating religion wouldn't eliminate what's bad about humanity, as various genocidal atheist regimes proved. I can also appreciate religion as what Wallace Stevens called the "supreme fiction," or fiction that felt so truthful that people simply took it as literally true, and reading Blake, Jung, Stevens, and even Jordan Peterson (to a lesser extent) has made me appreciate how many psychological/experiential truths there are in religion. Ah, just take the compliment.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Apr 30, 2020 16:58:28 GMT
Well, thanks for the kudos. Because of my various interests I always feel like a jack-of-all-trades, master-of-none sort. I would recommend you not dismiss all philosophy so easily, though. It's an incredibly wide/diverse field that's directly relevant to many aspects of our lives. Take epistemology, eg, which is the study of knowledge. If you don't have any understanding of how knowledge works, you're pretty much at the mercy of cognitive biases and rationalizations, unless you just get lucky and are born rational/logical. Morality/Ethics is another obvious one that's very relevant to our lives. As for politics, yeah, I'm mostly liberal but there are some conservative positions I agree with and I think both sides have extremes that can get loony. As for religion, my position on that has changed a lot over the years. Right now I'd say I'm mostly only anti-fundamentalism and against those who try to push religion onto others or into politics. Beyond that, I don't really have a problem with religion and I actually think it has contributed a lot of positive things to humanity, including much of the best music from the greatest composers. What I tend to say about religion these days is that it's rarely the problem itself; to the extent that it's good and bad it's merely a reflection of what's good and bad in humanity. Eliminating religion wouldn't eliminate what's bad about humanity, as various genocidal atheist regimes proved. I can also appreciate religion as what Wallace Stevens called the "supreme fiction," or fiction that felt so truthful that people simply took it as literally true, and reading Blake, Jung, Stevens, and even Jordan Peterson (to a lesser extent) has made me appreciate how many psychological/experiential truths there are in religion. Ah, just take the compliment. I don't take compliments well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2020 16:59:23 GMT
Ah, just take the compliment. I don't take compliments well. Me neither. They make me shrink up and give more credit to others. But nonetheless, one should be proud of their own accomplishments, no?
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Apr 30, 2020 17:05:12 GMT
I don't take compliments well. Me neither. They make me shrink up and give more credit to others. But nonetheless, one should be proud of their own accomplishments, no? I think my lack of pride comes from insecurity about the fact that I've never formally studied anything. I was selling stuff online in my teens and took up online poker at 18, and I've been successful enough that I never bothered going to college. So what I know just comes from learning on my own. Like, I'm a weirdo that reads textbooks for fun and listens to science/philosophy podcasts; but I'm very aware that for any subject I've learned about there are undoubtedly many out there who know far more than me, and I really don't want to make myself look like an ignorant ass if they happen to be around. But, here, take this compliment: you're one of my favorite posters on the Politics forum. There are only a handful of people over there that I can read without wanting to bash my head against a table, and you're one of them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2020 17:07:40 GMT
Me neither. They make me shrink up and give more credit to others. But nonetheless, one should be proud of their own accomplishments, no? I think my lack of pride comes from insecurity about the fact that I've never formally studied anything. I was selling stuff online in my teens and took up online poker at 18, and I've been successful enough that I never bothered going to college. So what I know just comes from learning on my own, like I'm a weirdo that reads textbooks for fun and listens to science/philosophy podcasts; but I'm very aware that for any subject I've learned about there are undoubtedly many out there who know far more than me, and I really don't want to make myself look like an ignorant ass if they happen to be around. Brilliance isn't something that comes from rote and routine. It comes from a keen mind with a chip on its shoulder and the feeling that it needs to do everything to learn. I think you've got that, lad. At least give yourself some credit for it. Don't worry. A touch of hubris won't weigh you down like a boat anchor.
|
|