|
|
Post by Prime etc. on May 4, 2020 13:49:59 GMT
Arguments from authority continue to be fallacies. Plus if I post a quote from an actual communist saying that the US isn't communist will you accept it? Of course not. Why would I trust a communist to give an accurate picture of something? I would however trust an anti-communist who critiques the US and provides examples. Solzhenitsyn talked about the US media and how it prevented diverse voices from speaking like communism did.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on May 4, 2020 13:51:14 GMT
Nazi moron continues this 'discussion' with another moronic post. Do you really believe anti-Semites deserve to have others take their opinions seriously and enter into serious talks with them? If so, you're even stupider than your previous posts here have already indicated. You are doing a wonderful job showing that your side cannot make a coherent discussion of issues. You are standing on a street corner ranting and raving, it's not flattering but hey, whatever floats your boat.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 4, 2020 15:17:42 GMT
You have a lot to teach me in the art of stupidity, I respectfully bow to the master.
I rest my case. Refreshing to see a Nazi admit to his stupidity, however--even to admitting he has more to learn on the subject. Christ, he's still going.  And it seems yet again he's relying on false information from a forged document. Page 56 from the link below. They did abide by a scorched earth policy but there's nothing about dressing up as Nazis. Gee, who would benefit from this revision?
|
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on May 4, 2020 16:24:03 GMT
Nazi moron continues this 'discussion' with another moronic post. Do you really believe anti-Semites deserve to have others take their opinions seriously and enter into serious talks with them? If so, you're even stupider than your previous posts here have already indicated. You are doing a wonderful job showing that your side cannot make a coherent discussion of issues. You are standing on a street corner ranting and raving, it's not flattering but hey, whatever floats your boat.
Coherent discussion taking as its starting point 'evidence' obtained from forged documents, as politicidal pointed out. You really need to look up the definition of coherent, l'il Adolph.
|
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on May 4, 2020 16:30:56 GMT
I rest my case. Refreshing to see a Nazi admit to his stupidity, however--even to admitting he has more to learn on the subject. Christ, he's still going. And it seems yet again he's relying on false information from a forged document. Page 56 from the link below. They did abide by a scorched earth policy but there's nothing about dressing up as Nazis. Gee, who would benefit from this revision?
Thanks for supplying this. I noted this right up at the top of the page: Order of the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command of November 17, 1941 No. 428 on the creation of special teams for the destruction and burning of settlements in the rear of the Nazi troops
but, golly, it would appear that Nazis had nothing to do with any of this according to our boon companion Prime. Stormfronters never fail to amuse in their own cretinous way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on May 4, 2020 17:48:42 GMT
I rest my case. Refreshing to see a Nazi admit to his stupidity, however--even to admitting he has more to learn on the subject. Christ, he's still going. And it seems yet again he's relying on false information from a forged document. Page 56 from the link below. They did abide by a scorched earth policy but there's nothing about dressing up as Nazis. Gee, who would benefit from this revision?
Fuck are you blind? It's the other idiot who keeps replying. They said "well I guess you will have the last word" and then the low IQ case KEEPS replying. It's very simply comrade, if you bolshevik babies want the last word, just stop replying to me. Very old fashioned action, reaction. As for the claim that Stalin was a good guy. Omigod-how pathetic. Even wikipedia has these
Russia confirmed the Torch Man order is real so you are in looney Soviet fan worship territory there as well. Communists lie.
And since you wouldnt want to be called a racist here's what the Zulus think of communism:
He said if Ramaphosa implemented the land expropriation policy without removing the “no compensation” clause, the country would go the route of Zimbabwe, which was plunged into poverty after the land was grabbed from white farmers without compensation.
“When I was the Kwa*Zulu government prime minister, I was visited by youths from Russia who told me they wanted nothing to do with communism because it had destroyed their country,” he said.
It's bad enough you take Solzhenitsyn as no authority on the matter--get away from me you mentally deficient losers. Go play with yourselves and keep me out of your sad antics.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 4, 2020 20:27:51 GMT
Christ, he's still going. And it seems yet again he's relying on false information from a forged document. Page 56 from the link below. They did abide by a scorched earth policy but there's nothing about dressing up as Nazis. Gee, who would benefit from this revision?
Thanks for supplying this. I noted this right up at the top of the page: Order of the Headquarters of the Supreme High Command of November 17, 1941 No. 428 on the creation of special teams for the destruction and burning of settlements in the rear of the Nazi troops
but, golly, it would appear that Nazis had nothing to do with any of this according to our boon companion Prime. Stormfronters never fail to amuse in their own cretinous way. I remember this one thread on the politics board that made one of them (a shitheel named Jimchowder or something like that) absolutely insane and he was so angered that even all the cons who participated in the thread were telling him to tone it down.
|
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on May 7, 2020 9:31:37 GMT
Arguments from authority continue to be fallacies. Plus if I post a quote from an actual communist saying that the US isn't communist will you accept it? Of course not. Why would I trust a communist to give an accurate picture of something? I would however trust an anti-communist who critiques the US and provides examples. Solzhenitsyn talked about the US media and how it prevented diverse voices from speaking like communism did.
Right so you only trust sources that confirm your hypothesis. Saying he doesn't like Western media still doesn't make a country with free market based economics a communist country. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 7, 2020 15:24:56 GMT
Of course not. Why would I trust a communist to give an accurate picture of something? I would however trust an anti-communist who critiques the US and provides examples. Solzhenitsyn talked about the US media and how it prevented diverse voices from speaking like communism did.
Right so you only trust sources that confirm your hypothesis. Saying he doesn't like Western media still doesn't make a country with free market based economics a communist country. Of course, he's partial to the anticommunist critic who has a history of dabbling in antisemitic dog-whistling.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on May 7, 2020 15:34:13 GMT
Right so you only trust sources that confirm your hypothesis. Saying he doesn't like Western media still doesn't make a country with free market based economics a communist country. We already went through this. Communism is about policies beyond money. Check out the Communist Manifesto. McCarthy wasn't thinking about money. Solzhenitsyn didn't focus on money in his Harvard speech. "Marx or Money" is a false choice.
|
|
