|
|
Post by fartyfartsalot on May 7, 2017 0:41:40 GMT
You know what to do.
|
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on May 7, 2017 2:37:30 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 7, 2017 2:38:07 GMT
I like both, but I got give it a slight edge to U2 because they never broke up and have a stronger body of work.
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on May 7, 2017 5:03:30 GMT
U2
|
|
|
|
Post by fartyfartsalot on May 8, 2017 0:39:07 GMT
Arent' you going to give U2 an extra vote with your sock? |
|
|
|
Post by pippinmaniac on May 8, 2017 1:45:58 GMT
U2
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on May 8, 2017 1:59:12 GMT
Arent' you going to give U2 an extra vote with your sock? The big bad poster didn't like my wittle movie! WAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by eplay on May 8, 2017 23:55:56 GMT
Never cared for U2. Yawn-worthy music.
|
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on May 9, 2017 11:35:43 GMT
If I never got to hear either again, the few songs I might miss would be U2's.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 13:24:28 GMT
I'd rather listen to Axl's solo group version of GN'R than U2....
|
|
|
|
Post by permutojoe on May 21, 2017 14:06:27 GMT
In the 90s? Definitely GnR. Nowadays I'm kind of over GnR, but U2 has some songs that I'll still turn up on the radio.
|
|
Heisenberg
Sophomore
@lemmylugosi
Posts: 221
Likes: 84
 
|
Post by Heisenberg on May 21, 2017 16:45:59 GMT
If I had to listen to one or the other for an extended period, I'd choose U2 over Hacksell Rose and Slush, each and every time. I pretty much hate GNR, even though I've seen them live at their peak.
|
|
|
|
Post by fartyfartsalot on May 21, 2017 17:32:23 GMT
If I had to listen to one or the other for an extended period, I'd choose U2 over Hacksell Rose and Slush, each and every time. I pretty much hate GNR, even though I've seen them live at their peak. Were GNR good live? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 21, 2017 19:19:42 GMT
If I had to listen to one or the other for an extended period, I'd choose U2 over Hacksell Rose and Slush, each and every time. I pretty much hate GNR, even though I've seen them live at their peak. Were GNR good live? They still are. |
|
|
|
Post by Utpe on May 21, 2017 21:58:29 GMT
Guns N' Roses any day of the week.
I can rock out to Paradise City (1987) for hours and never become bored. They have some pretty fantastic music.
|
|
Heisenberg
Sophomore
@lemmylugosi
Posts: 221
Likes: 84
|
Post by Heisenberg on May 22, 2017 0:16:25 GMT
If I had to listen to one or the other for an extended period, I'd choose U2 over Hacksell Rose and Slush, each and every time. I pretty much hate GNR, even though I've seen them live at their peak. Were GNR good live? They were alright. I saw them in the 1980s in NYC at a private industry invite-only show at a small club in the Village. I managed the biggest record store in Queens at the time, and scored a ticket. They seemed very rough and raw, and, at times, very unprofessional in attitude ( especially Axl). Saw them again just a few years back in Detroit, and it was GnR in name only, the "Axl's band" period, ya know? They (he) have tarnished their image with so much stupid bullshit over the last two+ decades, that I find it difficult to care at all about any of them anymore. Oh, and I've seen Slash's solo band(s) a few times, each time with huge line-up changes. It can and does turn off some fans, especially those who might otherwise be dedicated mega-fans. I've been in several bands, too; the very best ones were the ones where we all got along well, and had a cohesive vision of what we were trying to accomplish. I've seldom seen members of GnR enjoy either of those uniting traits. |
|
