Us (2019) is the greatest horror movie ever according to Rot

What can you expect with this Marxist downsizing multicultural nonsense.

In the 1960s and 70s there were perhaps 100 or more directors of horror films--many coming from Europe.
Now we are to believe one black guy is all that makes the cut in the West?
They deliberately suppress competition and promotion of artists.

Let's not be hasty.

A Quiet Place is #3 and that is directed by a white guy and is also less interesting, less creepy, less well-made and less creative than Us or Get Out imo.

There are a bunch of placements that seem ridiculous on this list and that has to do with the unfair way that RT ranks movies. 

I'm so upset right now. Don't know how I'll cope.

What a load of pathetic nonsense lol!

The Quiet Place had a child killed in the first few seconds sure the woman was stupid for still becoming pregnant again during an alien invasion but even so it's still better than Get out and the Us movie by far. Flesh eating kid killing monsters are always an easy winner anyway.

Why would a review aggregator site matter?

It's just math and OP should just write each reviewer

In any event...Great "Pick!"

I liked both Us and Get Out (Us was like a 6/10 or 7/10 to me but I especially loved Get Out which is one of my favorite horror movies of the 2010s), but this is a prime example as to why the tomatometer is a horrible way to rank movies based on their critical reception. It only takes into account what percentage of people liked the movie (adjusted for the number of reviews with a bayesian average). Not that I care that much about the average critical opinion, your own opinion is the one that counts for you, but the average rating is a way better indicator of 'critical reception' than the tomatometer. But for some reason Rotten Tomatoes keeps pushing it further to the back to the point that it doesn't even directly show up anymore when you click on a movie. The tomatometer is a good measure of how 'likeable' a movie is. And it that case I can definitely see why f.e. Get Out would rank very high, I haven't spoken to anyone who outright disliked the movie. But if you want a list that looks more like the top 100 critics lists or something like that than the average rating is way better. In the end I don't really care that much about it, especially compared to ~10 years ago when I started to really get into movies. Rotten tomatoes, metacritic etc. are all great tools. But in the end it's your own opinion and, when discussing movies with someone else, also the opinion of that other person of course that really matter. It's also good to keep in mind that there is no 'objective quality' to art. There can be arguments that there is some level of objectivity to what we consider basic and good filmmaking techniques, but review aggregators don't give a definitive answer on how good a movie is. No one can and it has started countless unnecessary and pointless discussions on the internet over the years. It's way more fun to explain why you like/dislike a movie, instead of trying to prove movie A is better than movie B in a cinemasins-like manner. If a person instead of a review aggregator would say that Us is their favorite horror movie than that is a perfectly fine opinion and could lead to a very interesting discussion on the movie depending on whether you agree or disagree with that person, which is in the end what movie forums like this one are all about.

Not a fan of Rotten Tomatoes. After all these years, I still don't understand how their ratings work. Based on percentage of positive reviews? But what constitutes a positive review? Is it a binary choice? Do they consider that a review is either positive or negative? That is the impression I get, but it is not how reviews work. I would say that most reviews for most movies are neither entirely positive nor entirely negative.

RT is a political propaganda site that rigs movie scores.