|
|
Post by mstreepsucks on Sept 9, 2021 5:01:12 GMT
That was actually good in any way? I for one have not. I mean live action feature films.
|
|
|
|
Post by rudeboy on Sept 9, 2021 5:30:10 GMT
Lots and lots of them. Excessive length does not automatically mean a film is better, and plenty of movies drag on far longer than they need to.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 9, 2021 5:33:00 GMT
This is Spinal Tap - 82 minutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Sept 9, 2021 6:16:07 GMT
Freaks
Rope
Rashomon
Toy Story
Stand By Me
Airplane!
And of course, the one and only Halloween H20.
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Sept 9, 2021 6:29:22 GMT
Evil Dead 2
Paths of Glory
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Sept 9, 2021 6:35:02 GMT
Yes many times.
|
|
|
|
Post by phantomparticle on Sept 9, 2021 8:10:58 GMT
I believe a feature film, as defined by Classic Hollywood and for television release, had to be over 60 minutes and have had a theatrical showing, and even some of those may have fallen just short of the mark (generally from poverty row).
On the up side:
The Black Swan with Tyrone Power (1942) was 85m
Laura (1944) was 85m
The Basil Rathbone Sherlock Holmes movies clocked under 90m
The Universal horror films of the 1930's and 1940's
Brief Encounter (1945) was 85m
It's A Gift with WC Fields (1934) was 68m
The Val Lewton films came in under 90m
The Little Fugitive (1953) was 75m
Way Out West with Laurel and Hardy (1937) ran a scant 65m
At some point filmmakers decided that longer was better and the more longer was the more betterer, which is why we get The Shawshank Redemption (142m), Heat (172m), Titanic (194m) and various versions of It's A Mad Mad Mad Mad World (175m on home video), extended pleasures to some, endurance tests to others.
|
|
|
|
Post by theravenking on Sept 9, 2021 10:36:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Fox in the Snow on Sept 9, 2021 10:58:41 GMT
From Hong Sang-soo alone
2004 Woman Is the Future of Man - 88
2005 Tale of Cinema - 89
2010 Oki's Movie - 80
2012 In Another Country - 89
2014 Hill of Freedom - 66
2016 Yourself and Yours - 86
2017 Claire's Camera - 69
2018 Grass - 66
|
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Sept 9, 2021 11:50:26 GMT
Of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 9, 2021 13:05:52 GMT
Yes, several of them that were from the ‘30s and ‘40s.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catman on Sept 9, 2021 13:59:47 GMT
Many.
|
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Sept 9, 2021 14:10:29 GMT
Lots.
|
|
|
|
Post by bravomailer on Sept 9, 2021 14:52:15 GMT
A Hard Day's Night - 87 minutes
|
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Sept 9, 2021 15:08:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Captain Spencer on Sept 9, 2021 16:56:30 GMT
Passenger 57, at 84 minutes. And it might have been a better action movie if it was longer, but it seemed rushed.
EDIT: And you have to remember that total running times in movies also includes the credits, so in the case of Passenger 57, not including the credits, the run time would come out to be about 80 minutes or less.
|
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Sept 9, 2021 20:32:33 GMT
Loads
|
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Sept 10, 2021 5:38:48 GMT
A lot of animated movies and some horror flicks have a runtime of under 90 minutes and I've enjoyed plenty of those.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Sept 10, 2021 6:17:16 GMT
Buffy The Vampire Slayer , it still holds up
|
|
|
|
Post by darksidebeadle on Sept 10, 2021 6:36:42 GMT
A lot yes
|
|
