|
Post by thisguy4000 on Mar 20, 2023 21:31:51 GMT
I don’t think it’ll reach $500 million. Oh well. Better luck with GotG 3.
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Mar 23, 2023 3:54:50 GMT
Are we allowed to call this disappointing yet? Because it definitely is.
|
|
|
Post by onethreetwo on Mar 23, 2023 4:04:52 GMT
It's an absolute miracle that we have an Ant-Man trilogy to begin with. If you would've told me in 2005 I would've called you crazy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2023 6:31:00 GMT
I hope they don’t take the wrong lesson here. Iger is already saying he will limit sequels. The movie didn’t fail because it’s the third in the franchise. It failed because it was a mediocre movie with terrible word of mouth.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 23, 2023 12:07:52 GMT
I hope they don’t take the wrong lesson here. Iger is already saying he will limit sequels. The movie didn’t fail because it’s the third in the franchise. It failed because it was a mediocre movie with terrible word of mouth. It's also third in a series of films that were never as successful as other titles in the MCU in the first place. The numbers don't lie, Ant-Man movies have never been that profitable.
|
|
|
Post by Power Ranger on Mar 23, 2023 13:21:22 GMT
I hope they don’t take the wrong lesson here. Iger is already saying he will limit sequels. The movie didn’t fail because it’s the third in the franchise. It failed because it was a mediocre movie with terrible word of mouth. Thor 4 and Antman 3 failed. The only answer could be that people are tired of sequels. That’s why you’re getting paid the big bucks, Iger!
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Mar 23, 2023 14:58:30 GMT
I hope they don’t take the wrong lesson here. Iger is already saying he will limit sequels. The movie didn’t fail because it’s the third in the franchise. It failed because it was a mediocre movie with terrible word of mouth. Aren't you people always whining about over saturation?
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Mar 23, 2023 16:16:03 GMT
I hope they don’t take the wrong lesson here. Iger is already saying he will limit sequels. The movie didn’t fail because it’s the third in the franchise. It failed because it was a mediocre movie with terrible word of mouth. If anything it's a sign that Peyton Reed shouldn't return for a Ant-Man 4, if we get one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2023 16:38:47 GMT
I hope they don’t take the wrong lesson here. Iger is already saying he will limit sequels. The movie didn’t fail because it’s the third in the franchise. It failed because it was a mediocre movie with terrible word of mouth. Aren't you people always whining about over saturation? “You people”?! What kind of racist are you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2023 16:40:09 GMT
I hope they don’t take the wrong lesson here. Iger is already saying he will limit sequels. The movie didn’t fail because it’s the third in the franchise. It failed because it was a mediocre movie with terrible word of mouth. If anything it's a sign that Peyton Reed shouldn't return for an Ant-Man 4, if we get one. Oh hell yeah. He should’ve been let go after the second movie. Especially after they decided the third would be more sci fi/fantasy oriented and introduce Kang. It was clear he wasn’t going to be able to handle a movie with a more ambitious goal.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 23, 2023 17:24:37 GMT
Aren't you people always whining about over saturation? “You people”?! What kind of racist are you? A squid bigot. Squigot.
|
|