|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jul 5, 2017 21:03:06 GMT
Enjoy:
|
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 5, 2017 21:25:17 GMT
So actually they have not, but they do suggest that it is possible. Of course the question always remains, what God is proven? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2017 21:27:11 GMT
Oh FSM, they didn't even get 70 seconds in before the started on "the coding in DNA" as evidence of god.
This is not promising.
Watching on...
|
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Jul 5, 2017 21:30:34 GMT
So actually they have not, but they do suggest that it is possible. Of course the question always remains, what God is proven? Taking into consideration that most religions are monotheistic today, would such a question be necessary? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2017 21:31:44 GMT
Okay, and another minute in they summarise their big evidence as :
1) The universe had a beginning.
Depends on what you mean by "the universe". But possibly, sure. Not sure what this has to do with god, though.
2) The universe is just right for life.
This is absurd in at least two different ways. One - no, the universe is not just right for life. It is, in fact, almost completely hostile to life. Drop a life form (a person, say) into our universe in a spot chosen entirely at random. There is a 99.999999999999%+ chance that your person will be dead within sixty seconds or so.
Two - rather obviously, it is life that is "right" for the universe, not vice versa.
3) The "design" in DNA.
This argument has been so thoroughly and completely debunked that simply stating it demonstrates that you are either utterly ignorant of the subject, or lying.
So. What a waste of time.
|
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 5, 2017 21:34:09 GMT
So actually they have not, but they do suggest that it is possible. Of course the question always remains, what God is proven? Taking into consideration that most religions are monotheistic today, would such a question be necessary? Of course, given that the religions of today are at each others throats, this kind of 'proof' could be proving an alien as the God required. But there is no proof given here, there is some evidence but it mostly boils down to the watchmaker argument. |
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Jul 5, 2017 21:58:56 GMT
Great, now they can try to answer the question: "What does God need with a Starship?"
|
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 5, 2017 22:02:14 GMT
Great, now they can try to answer the question: "What does God need with a Starship?" Worst star trek yet. |
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jul 5, 2017 22:13:18 GMT
captainbryce & gadreel
I agree that was the worst ST film; worse than the episode "Spock's Brain" from the TV series. I was waiting for someone to come up with the Starship quote.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catman on Jul 5, 2017 22:25:40 GMT
And cosmetologists have yet to prove anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Jul 5, 2017 22:37:13 GMT
I have no idea why there are so many Beavis and Butthead clones here who say the Star Trek V is the worst of the series, when it is undeniably the best. It's the one which delves the most into characters instead of the usual goofy iconic stature of them. This is the only one in which the Star Trek crew doesn't come across as one or two dimensional beings in the usual Hollywood formula stories.
|
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Jul 5, 2017 23:17:26 GMT
Maya55555 has proven the existence of gullibility.
|
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jul 5, 2017 23:39:39 GMT
sold sam simes
Had presented a cosmologist's opinion on the case for intelligent design. Since I assume that you are not of that occupation, how can you intelligently argue their findings?
BTW, I never stated that it was my opinion, TRUE?
|
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Jul 6, 2017 2:10:58 GMT
Great, now they can try to answer the question: "What does God need with a Starship?" Worst star trek yet. I preferred 5 to Generations, but its definitely my least fave of 1-6. |
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Jul 6, 2017 2:12:36 GMT
I have no idea why there are so many Beavis and Butthead clones here who say the Star Trek V is the worst of the series, when it is undeniably the best. It's the one which delves the most into characters instead of the usual goofy iconic stature of them. This is the only one in which the Star Trek crew doesn't come across as one or two dimensional beings in the usual Hollywood formula stories.
Yeah, but it looks pretty cheap. 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on Jul 6, 2017 2:19:27 GMT
sold sam simes
Had presented a cosmologists opinion on the case for intelligent design. Since I assume that you are not of that occupation, how can you intelligently argue their findings?
BTW, I never stated that it was my opinion, TRUE? Remember when someone was whining about authority dicksucking? Is it OK to swallow the cock custard when you whore yourself out.....I mean, totally agree with what some authority figure says if it happens to give you a sensation like your whole body is ALIVE, yet the most intense feelings congregate down below, followed by the pleasurable rush and release when such feelings reach a climax? |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 6, 2017 2:26:17 GMT
I preferred 5 to Generations, but its definitely my least fave of 1-6. I did not mind generations, it was a bit of a shoehorn, but I really appreciated the effort to 'pass on the reins' |
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Jul 6, 2017 2:47:05 GMT
I have no idea why there are so many Beavis and Butthead clones here who say the Star Trek V is the worst of the series, when it is undeniably the best. It's the one which delves the most into characters instead of the usual goofy iconic stature of them. This is the only one in which the Star Trek crew doesn't come across as one or two dimensional beings in the usual Hollywood formula stories.
I do think V takes a somewhat unfair rap, and you raise an interesting point story-wise. On the other hand, there's no doubt that Mr. Spock was a better director than Capt. Kirk. About the story though, I would think that a theist would be a bit uncomfortable with the narrative. Sort of like how the original series episode "The Will of Landru" challenges devotion to a religious authority that demands obedience. |
|
|
|
Post by captainbryce on Jul 6, 2017 2:54:52 GMT
Great, now they can try to answer the question: "What does God need with a Starship?" Worst star trek yet. True. But even the worst Star Trek movie still had some good scenes in it. I liked the camaraderie between Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. |
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jul 6, 2017 3:01:56 GMT
True. But even the worst Star Trek movie still had some good scenes in it. I liked the camaraderie between Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. Honestly I watched it once when it first came out and have not gone back, I will watch the first four soon (I have them on blu ray) and consider the 5th again. To be fair the worst star trek is still pretty good. |
|
