|
Post by darkpast on Jul 15, 2017 3:06:13 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2017 15:15:45 GMT
Haven't seen yet, but I'll see it soon. When I do I'll post my rating.
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jul 16, 2017 23:18:18 GMT
6.5/10. I rounded it up to a 7, but this was so disappointing. The first 20 minutes and the last 20 minutes were phenomenal. They were just as good as 'Dawn', but the middle was a slog. I was struggling to stay awake, and I've never had that problem with any movie (and I've watched some real snooze fests).
The story goes nowhere in the middle. People are going to say that the people who found it to be too slow are just braindead action fiends. That's not the case at all. I love the slow-burn type of blockbusters that lead to a finale or sparingly use action, but this was different. The story went absolutely nowhere and the characters did nothing.
They also set up a few "micro side-stories" with different characters and their relation to Caesar. Yet for some reason they were all either forgotten or completely ruined. I just don't know what they wanted to get at.
The visuals and the performances were good, though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2017 5:38:44 GMT
6.5/10. I rounded it up to a 7, but this was so disappointing. The first 20 minutes and the last 20 minutes were phenomenal. They were just as good as 'Dawn', but the middle was a slog. I was struggling to stay awake, and I've never had that problem with any movie (and I've watched some real snooze fests). The story goes nowhere in the middle. People are going to say that the people who found it to be too slow are just braindead action fiends. That's not the case at all. I love the slow-burn type of blockbusters that lead to a finale or sparingly use action, but this was different. The story went absolutely nowhere and the characters did nothing. They also set up a few "micro side-stories" with different characters and their relation to Caesar. Yet for some reason they were all either forgotten or completely ruined. I just don't know what they wanted to get at. The visuals and the performances were good, though. Wow, sorry that you were disappointed man.
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jul 17, 2017 6:09:26 GMT
6.5/10. I rounded it up to a 7, but this was so disappointing. The first 20 minutes and the last 20 minutes were phenomenal. They were just as good as 'Dawn', but the middle was a slog. I was struggling to stay awake, and I've never had that problem with any movie (and I've watched some real snooze fests). The story goes nowhere in the middle. People are going to say that the people who found it to be too slow are just braindead action fiends. That's not the case at all. I love the slow-burn type of blockbusters that lead to a finale or sparingly use action, but this was different. The story went absolutely nowhere and the characters did nothing. They also set up a few "micro side-stories" with different characters and their relation to Caesar. Yet for some reason they were all either forgotten or completely ruined. I just don't know what they wanted to get at. The visuals and the performances were good, though. Wow, sorry that you were disappointed man. Thanks. Have you seen it yet?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2017 7:02:49 GMT
Wow, sorry that you were disappointed man. Thanks. Have you seen it yet? Not yet, I just rewatched "Rise". I'll rewatch "dawn" tomorrow and hopefully watch "war" before dunkirk on Thursday.
|
|
Peter B. Parker
Sophomore
Watch the hands, not the mouth
@babygroot
Posts: 853
Likes: 411
|
Post by Peter B. Parker on Sept 10, 2017 14:14:28 GMT
10. I thought it was a satisfying conclusion to what came before it. The CGI is amazing.
|
|
barkingbaphomet
Junior Member
all backlit and creepysmoking
@barkingbaphomet
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 1,006
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on Sept 10, 2017 22:04:06 GMT
it was... fine. Serkis always brings the goods. the Nova thing killed any kind of immersion i had in the story, which was annoying.
tbh i've found these Ape prequels to be competent but completely overhyped. i will be happy if this marks the end of them.
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Sept 10, 2017 22:31:18 GMT
B+ I guess, above average. This series is over for me, I'll not be rewarding them for milking with a 4th. I wanted a planet of the apes, not a hidden grove in the forest of apes.
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Sept 17, 2017 4:04:58 GMT
8.5/10
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Jan 9, 2018 1:18:46 GMT
7/10
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jan 9, 2018 1:20:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sjg on Dec 4, 2019 9:34:29 GMT
8/10
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Dec 6, 2019 20:35:57 GMT
8/10
|
|
|
Post by Sarge on Dec 20, 2019 8:33:42 GMT
7/10
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Jan 25, 2020 10:23:42 GMT
6/10
|
|