|
|
Post by hi224 on Aug 29, 2017 16:26:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on Aug 30, 2017 13:13:54 GMT
Maybe with today's technology we could send some miniature submarines and other teleguided drones to find it but I'm not sure it's the top priority in terms of resources(money and material) and time. While I don't have an explanation for the inability to find a wreckage, the site you linked might have some clues on why it crashed, from their scanned documents: www.ufobc.ca/kinross/otherTopics/usafDocs.htmlYou got the correction sheet:   It seems a few things weren't changed/done:  The transcription: " 3 December 1953
C E R T I F I C A T E
1. The following Technical Orders were noted on Part III of the Form 1 as not complied with for
F-89C 5105853A.
a. T.O.01-1-476 Replacement Exchange of Type B-8 stick grip.
b. T.O. 01-15DC-1 Not in A/C.
c. T.O. 02B-1-17 Compounding the Ignition System
d. T.O. 01-15FDC-172 Installation R.O's Interphone cutout SW.
e. T.O. 02B-1050-73 Removal of Latch.
/S/
DAVID C. COLLINS
Captain USAF
Aircraft Accident Investigating Officer
23 November 1953 A/C NO 51-5853A Lt. Moncla " (Taken from : cufon.org/kinross/Kinross_acc_rept.htm ) Now I'm no expert on planes but it seems the ignition system needed some compound repair and that an interphone switch had some issues. Having ignition issues with your car while driving at 100km/h might be problematic so my guess is it may equally if not worst in a plane. Then you got interphone switch (I guess that what SW stands for). I don't know how important the issue can be but if you miss a piece it may create some issues? Then the article states that the F-89 C still had issues like the B version. So, even if the chances are slim it may be possible the plane had some technical issues and crashed near the object that emitted the signal on the radar. It may be how it happened or just me playing the devil's advocate and being in denial about a coverup of a UFO encounter turned wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Sept 1, 2017 3:11:42 GMT
But why couldnt they find it.
|
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on Sept 1, 2017 23:23:15 GMT
- It could have flown for a little while longer like flight MH370. In the Kinross case we don't know for sure that it flew for a while after disappearing from the radar though. If it did, it may have crashed just way out of the search zone, in an area with very little population, in the great Canadian wild. If that story is credible: www.ufobc.ca/kinross/otherAccounts/railwayCrewHeardCrash.html (The railway company exists, Sault Ste-Marie exists : ((https://www.google.ca/maps/place/Sault+Ste.+Marie,+ON/@46.5566806,-84.4079243,16897m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x4d36311508818c7b:0xc55b0eb513db21cd!8m2!3d46.521858!4d-84.3460896 ) copy the link in the address bar, linking it doesn't work here). - It could have disintegrated when it hit the water. You could always show this : . I would agree it wasn't pulverized and after a while some large debris were seen floating around. The search teams didn't see anything about the crew or the F-89 though but if it hit the water, was it from the same angle shown in the clip? Would different angles leave different debris in terms of size? - For the sake of listing as many possibilities as possible, could it be that they didn't have have technology to find the wreckage if it sank? Usually the army has the top equipment available but in some really high end and very specific domains it may not always be the case. - Could it be that from the angle of the hit, the F-89 dropped on the spot while the other was able to fly further? Like this incident( not paranormal but still saddening) : globalnews.ca/news/3317356/two-planes-collide-in-saint-bruno-de-montarville/ The plane that crashed in the parking pretty much fell within a few feet from the point of impact while the other glided for a while to land on the rooftop. Still, it doesn't explain why we haven't heard from the other "signal" and why we haven't found any debris. - Could it be that they collided and they exploded and the signal that kept going was just a huge debris flying further due to the explosion? Huge stretch but it comes back to the plane being pulverized. - The UFO/ALien answer is that somehow it the F-89 got tractor-beamed, or shot and exploded or got teleported into another dimension? I don't have a definitive answer as to why we haven't found debris but I'm not excluding any possible explanation outside of the paranormal. |
|
