barcode
Sophomore
@barcode
Posts: 194
Likes: 108
|
Post by barcode on Oct 8, 2017 13:04:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Oct 8, 2017 13:35:54 GMT
Good trailer. I’ll be cautiously optimistic about the movie.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Oct 8, 2017 13:48:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by primeone on Oct 8, 2017 13:52:02 GMT
Exactly what I said it should be. Similar to the last trailer.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Oct 8, 2017 13:53:35 GMT
Good trailer, no big spoiler so at least they learned their lesson from the Doomsday reveal.
All in all it looks promising!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2017 14:15:33 GMT
Honestly, I have a theory about that Clark in the cornfield clip. I don’t think that’s a dream, I think it’s when he returns to Lois and it’s a deep and powerful moment in the film. I think it was cut to look like a dream sequence for the trailer. They were like, “how can we put him in the trailer without giving it away.” And they cut it to look like a dream.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Oct 8, 2017 14:16:28 GMT
Woo-hoo! Hollywood blows up London again. Nothing there to make me want to see it any more or any less. (I do want to see it). But hey, at least we get a shite Bowie cover.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Oct 8, 2017 14:28:07 GMT
I have to ask, what is appealing about this?
It looks like there's slow motion everywhere, the music choice here didn't fit at all and wasn't exciting, and was the flash joke at the end supposed to be funny? I really don't get this trailer. Everything looks like it's in not too convincing CGI. Seriously, did any of that look like it was taking place anywhere real? Maybe the cornfield in the dream sequence? IDK, this just looks not exciting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2017 14:30:08 GMT
My hopes for JL went up after seeing that trailer. Movie looks awesome. I cant wait to see this.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Oct 8, 2017 14:36:43 GMT
I have to ask, what is appealing about this?
It looks like there's slow motion everywhere, the music choice here didn't fit at all and wasn't exciting, and was the flash joke at the end supposed to be funny? I really don't get this trailer. Everything looks like it's in not too convincing CGI. Seriously, did any of that look like it was taking place anywhere real? Maybe the cornfield in the dream sequence? IDK, this just looks not exciting.
At the very least it looks like a fun popcorn film, like Thor: Ragnarok!
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Oct 8, 2017 16:04:53 GMT
I have to ask, what is appealing about this?
It looks like there's slow motion everywhere, the music choice here didn't fit at all and wasn't exciting, and was the flash joke at the end supposed to be funny? I really don't get this trailer. Everything looks like it's in not too convincing CGI. Seriously, did any of that look like it was taking place anywhere real? Maybe the cornfield in the dream sequence? IDK, this just looks not exciting.
At the very least it looks like a fun popcorn film, like Thor: Ragnarok! Do you really think those look comparable? Thor looks like it's capitalizing on major story elements from the past and future, and making overall smart moves like including all of the detailed kirby artwork, the casting, the complexity of the story, etc. JL just looks like some mindless CG action. I'm not really sure how those seem like the same thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2017 16:17:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Oct 8, 2017 16:30:52 GMT
At the very least it looks like a fun popcorn film, like Thor: Ragnarok! Do you really think those look comparable? Thor looks like it's capitalizing on major story elements from the past and future, and making overall smart moves like including all of the detailed kirby artwork, the casting, the complexity of the story, etc. JL just looks like some mindless CG action. I'm not really sure how those seem like the same thing. The Thor trailer is full of CGI and stupid jokes like " he's a friend from work" also
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Oct 8, 2017 16:37:11 GMT
I liked it.
|
|
|
Post by Nightman on Oct 8, 2017 16:39:23 GMT
Honestly, I have a theory about that Clark in the cornfield clip. I don’t think that’s a dream, I think it’s when he returns to Lois and it’s a deep and powerful moment in the film. I think it was cut to look like a dream sequence for the trailer. They were like, “how can we put him in the trailer without giving it away.” And they cut it to look like a dream. This is exactly what I think.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2017 16:42:26 GMT
Do you really think those look comparable? Thor looks like it's capitalizing on major story elements from the past and future, and making overall smart moves like including all of the detailed kirby artwork, the casting, the complexity of the story, etc. JL just looks like some mindless CG action. I'm not really sure how those seem like the same thing. The Thor trailer is full of CGI and stupid jokes like " he's a friend from work" also "He's a friend from work," is considerably more entertaining than watching Ezra Miller giggling and pointing like he has Asperger syndrome.....then again, so is sandpapering my ballsack.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Oct 8, 2017 16:50:37 GMT
Do you really think those look comparable? Thor looks like it's capitalizing on major story elements from the past and future, and making overall smart moves like including all of the detailed kirby artwork, the casting, the complexity of the story, etc. JL just looks like some mindless CG action. I'm not really sure how those seem like the same thing. The Thor trailer is full of CGI and stupid jokes like " he's a friend from work" also I don't see how that's a stupid joke, and the CGI from JL looks like CGI. I mean just look at the scene where aquaman falls through the building and comes sliding out like he was skateboarding. That's the kind of stuff I'm talking about. Ragnorak looks like it has a much greater depth of story and a tighter aesthetic. I didn't think that was really in debate tbh.
|
|
|
Post by King Conan on Oct 8, 2017 16:53:07 GMT
Most comic book movies are just mindless action flicks, with lot of CGI. That's why audiences love them. They doesn't to use their brains. Not really Differential from Transformers or Fast and Furious.
|
|
barcode
Sophomore
@barcode
Posts: 194
Likes: 108
|
Post by barcode on Oct 8, 2017 16:55:07 GMT
Yeah. Seems like they released two different trailers.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Oct 8, 2017 17:14:24 GMT
At the very least it looks like a fun popcorn film, like Thor: Ragnarok! Do you really think those look comparable? Thor looks like it's capitalizing on major story elements from the past and future, and making overall smart moves like including all of the detailed kirby artwork, the casting, the complexity of the story, etc. JL just looks like some mindless CG action. I'm not really sure how those seem like the same thing. Both look like their going to be a fun movie. Maybe I'm weird, but I'm excited for both.
|
|