Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2017 2:55:41 GMT
He should only kill if he HAS to. He shouldn't pancaking petty crooks by the dozens, especially in situations when he should be able to easily overpower them and leave them for the police. Most of those mercenaries he easily takes out over the course of the movie would have enough of a record to be put away for a long, long time. I think the problem with Affleck's version of Batman was that he felt more like The Punisher with a bit of Tony Stark mixed in. Granted, I know Keaton's Batman did use lethal force on many crooks, but Burton for the most part understood the other aspects of Batman. Bale's Batman only killed if absolutely necessary, such as when Harvey Dent was very possibly going to kill the boy. It was either the boy possibly died or Dent died. Exactly.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Nov 13, 2017 11:17:28 GMT
For example why does the Joker get to live? Is not a killer psychopath? Is he not a threat to innocent people? The law allows the use of lethal force only if he's an imminent threat to innocent people. If he isn't an imminent threat or he's been neutralized, then the law doesn't allow use of lethal force. For example, in Age of Ultron, Strucker was unarmed and just standing there and wasn't n imminent threat to anyone so when Cap kicked his shield (made of the strongest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) with such violent force that it sent Strucker crashing into the wall behind him, that was an illegal assault by Cap and thus Cap committed a violent and brutal crime. So Batman doesn't care about innocent lives? Because he would have killed the joker a long time ago if he did. Frank Castle would have made sure joker wouldn't have a body count that he has now.
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Nov 13, 2017 17:43:57 GMT
The law allows the use of lethal force only if he's an imminent threat to innocent people. If he isn't an imminent threat or he's been neutralized, then the law doesn't allow use of lethal force. For example, in Age of Ultron, Strucker was unarmed and just standing there and wasn't n imminent threat to anyone so when Cap kicked his shield (made of the strongest metal on Earth and strong enough to stop Thor's hammer) with such violent force that it sent Strucker crashing into the wall behind him, that was an illegal assault by Cap and thus Cap committed a violent and brutal crime. Hey asshole, why don't you stay on topic for once. This is about Batman, not Marvel Admin scabab
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jun 16, 2018 1:23:15 GMT
Good times
|
|